Primary Versus Secondary Metal Stent Implantation in PTBD

NCT ID: NCT04992585

Last Updated: 2021-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim is to compare percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with primary metal stent implantation (one stage-procedure) with PTBD with secondary metal stent implantation in terms of adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions (PBI) are used in biliary tract diseases when endoscopic access was not successful or not possible due to anatomical changes after abdominal surgery. Self-expandible metal stents (SEMS) can be applied percutaneously in patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. In this setting, PTBD is usually performed as a two step-procedure with primary drainage of the accumulated bile fluid by an external or an external/internal plastic stent and a secondary metal stent implantation at an interval of a few days. PTBD with primary metal stent implantation might shorten the hospital stay and is therefore equal to the increasingly used method of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). EUS-BD offers a one step-procedure with primary metal stent implantation which is probably associated with lesser adverse events (AE) than PTBD with secondary metal stent implantation. However, it is not clear whether PTBD with primary metal stent implantation shows fewer adverse events than PTBD with secondary stent implantation. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the prospectively collected data of PTBDs with primary or secondary metal stent implantation in patients with proximal and distal malignant bile duct obstruction. The focus of this single center study will be to compare the two approaches in terms of adverse events. Adverse events in PTBD might range from very mild to fatal. Therefore, the severity of the adverse events has been considered in the calculation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bile Duct Obstruction Extrahepatic Cholestasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Retrospective comparison of two similar interventions with small modification
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PTBD with primary metal stent implantation

PTBD with primary metal stent implantation is performed in the same session as a one step-procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous transhepatic implantation of self-expandable metal stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

A self-expandable metal stent is inserted into the extrahepatic bile duct which is obstructed by malignant disease

PTBD with secondary metal stent implantation

PTBD with secondary metal stent implantation is performed as a two step-procedure with metal stent implantation 3 to 7 days after previous percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and insertion of a plastic catheter

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous transhepatic implantation of self-expandable metal stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

A self-expandable metal stent is inserted into the extrahepatic bile duct which is obstructed by malignant disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous transhepatic implantation of self-expandable metal stent

A self-expandable metal stent is inserted into the extrahepatic bile duct which is obstructed by malignant disease

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PTBD with metal stent implantation into the extrahepatic bile duct
* malignant and non-resectable extrahepatic bile duct obstruction

Exclusion Criteria

* benign extrahepatic bile duct obstruction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Schmitz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, University of Heidelberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tertiary referral hospital: Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig Hospital, Academic

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B, Tombazzi C, Kahaleh M. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28063840 (View on PubMed)

Venkatanarasimha N, Damodharan K, Gogna A, Leong S, Too CW, Patel A, Tay KH, Tan BS, Lo R, Irani F. Diagnosis and Management of Complications from Percutaneous Biliary Tract Interventions. Radiographics. 2017 Mar-Apr;37(2):665-680. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160159.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28287940 (View on PubMed)

Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20189503 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PTBD retro 002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.