Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1993-07-31
2004-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic stent insertion is considered the method of choice for palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction (MBDO). However, it can cause complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, cholangitis and stent migration in a significant proportion of treated patients. Clogging of plastic stents is a predictable consequence and requires periodic stent exchanges with attendant risks and costs. While endoscopic stenting is clearly indicated for relief of cholangitis or refractory pruritus, the role of stenting in patients with jaundice alone, abdominal pain, or failure to thrive due to malignancy is less clear. Given the risk for complications and costs, endoscopic therapy might be justified in these clinical scenarios if quality of life (QOL) is significantly improved. A few available studies have demonstrated improved QOL in stented patients. However, these studies include a small number of patients and/or are retrospective in design. Therefore, more evidence to support routine palliative biliary drainage in patients with MBDO is desired.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
10 French Stent
10 French biliary plastic stent
ERCP with 10 French biliary plastic stent placement
Stent placement of a 10 French biliary plastic stent
11.5 French stent
11.5 French biliary plastic stent
ERCP with 11.5 French biliary plastic stent
biliary plastic stent placement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERCP with 10 French biliary plastic stent placement
Stent placement of a 10 French biliary plastic stent
ERCP with 11.5 French biliary plastic stent
biliary plastic stent placement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgery was planned
* A guidewire could not be passed through the stricture
* Suspected survival of \< 3 months
* Impending duodenal obstruction
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
OTHER
American College of Gastroenterology
OTHER
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stuart Sherman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University School of Medicine
Glen A Lehman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana Univesity Medical Center
James Frankes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rockford GE Associates
John Johanson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rockford GE Associates
Tahir Qaseem, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MaineHealth
Douglas Howell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MaineHealth
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Jan-Feb;52(1):23-47. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.1.23.
Lowy AM. From bad to worse: prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Feb;11(2):117-8. doi: 10.1245/aso.2004.12.930. No abstract available.
Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Boyle P (1998) Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. In: Howard J, Idezuki Y, Ihse I, Prinz R, eds. Surgical Diseases of the Pancreas. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 433-439
Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC, Mason RR, Hatfield AR, Leung JW, MacRae KD, Houghton J, Lennon CA. Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet. 1987 Jul 11;2(8550):57-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92733-4.
Andersen JR, Sorensen SM, Kruse A, Rokkjaer M, Matzen P. Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut. 1989 Aug;30(8):1132-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.8.1132.
Motte S, Deviere J, Dumonceau JM, Serruys E, Thys JP, Cremer M. Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting. Gastroenterology. 1991 Nov;101(5):1374-81. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90091-x.
Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB. Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jan;45(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70301-8.
Margulies C, Siqueira ES, Silverman WB, Lin XS, Martin JA, Rabinovitz M, Slivka A. The effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on acute and chronic complications of biliary endoprostheses. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jun;49(6):716-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70288-9.
Giorgio PD, Luca LD. Comparison of treatment outcomes between biliary plastic stent placements with and without endoscopic sphincterotomy for inoperable malignant common bile duct obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr 15;10(8):1212-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i8.1212.
Johanson JF, Schmalz MJ, Geenen JE. Incidence and risk factors for biliary and pancreatic stent migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 May-Jun;38(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70429-5.
Speer AG, Cotton PB, Rode J, Seddon AM, Neal CR, Holton J, Costerton JW. Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm. A light and electron microscopy study. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Apr;108(4):546-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-546.
Frakes JT, Johanson JF, Stake JJ. Optimal timing for stent replacement in malignant biliary tract obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Mar-Apr;39(2):164-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70058-9.
Ballinger AB, McHugh M, Catnach SM, Alstead EM, Clark ML. Symptom relief and quality of life after stenting for malignant bile duct obstruction. Gut. 1994 Apr;35(4):467-70. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.4.467.
Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Maier M, Kohler B, Benz C, Martin WR, Riemann JF. Endoscopic stenting in obstructive jaundice due to liver metastases: does it have a benefit for the patient? Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Jul-Aug;43(10):944-8.
Luman W, Cull A, Palmer KR. Quality of life in patients stented for malignant biliary obstructions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 May;9(5):481-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199705000-00013.
Abraham NS, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective trial examining impact on quality of life. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Dec;56(6):835-41. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129868.
Wagh MS, de Bellis M, Fogel EL, Frakes JT, Johanson JF, Qaseem T, Howell DA, Lehman GA, Sherman S. Multicenter Randomized Trial of 10-French versus 11.5-French Plastic Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:891915. doi: 10.1155/2013/891915. Epub 2013 May 2.
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
Cheung YB, Goh C, Thumboo J, Khoo KS, Wee J. Variability and sample size requirements of quality-of-life measures: a randomized study of three major questionnaires. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):4936-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.141.
Steel JL, Eton DT, Cella D, Olek MC, Carr BI. Clinically meaningful changes in health-related quality of life in patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2006 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj072. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
Hahn EA, Cella D, (1997) Unbiased quality of life measurement across literacy levels and mode of administration. Qual Life Res 6:654.
Yost KJ, Sorensen MV, Hahn EA, Glendenning GA, Gnanasakthy A, Cella D. Using multiple anchor- and distribution-based estimates to evaluate clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) instrument. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):117-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.08202.x.
Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 16;1:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-79.
Cella D, Li JZ, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin A, Charbonneau C, Kim ST, Chen I, Motzer RJ. Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib or interferon alfa: results from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3763-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5145.
Fairclough DL, Cella DF. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G): non-response to individual questions. Qual Life Res. 1996 Jun;5(3):321-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00433916.
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.
Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):371-83. doi: 10.4065/77.4.371.
Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K. Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):207-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1015276414526.
Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):192-211. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275341.
Rege RV. Adverse effects of biliary obstruction: implications for treatment of patients with obstructive jaundice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):287-93. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839957.
Kramer HJ. Impaired renal function in obstructive jaundice: roles of the thromboxane and endothelin systems. Nephron. 1997;77(1):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000190241.
Jiang WG, Puntis MC. Immune dysfunction in patients with obstructive jaundice, mediators and implications for treatments. HPB Surg. 1997;10(3):129-42. doi: 10.1155/1997/49076.
Cotton PB, Schmitt C. Quality of Life in palliative management of malignant obstructive jaundice. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993;199:44-6. doi: 10.3109/00365529309098357.
Moss AC, Morris E, Leyden J, MacMathuna P. Malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic and surgical bypass results. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Apr;33(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.10.006. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
Yeoh KG, Zimmerman MJ, Cunningham JT, Cotton PB. Comparative costs of metal versus plastic biliary stent strategies for malignant obstructive jaundice by decision analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Apr;49(4 Pt 1):466-71. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70044-1.
Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD. Quality of life after treatment of pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Apr;383(2):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s004230050106.
Barkay O, Mosler P, Schmitt CM, Lehman GA, Frakes JT, Johanson JF, Qaseem T, Howell DA, Sherman S. Effect of endoscopic stenting of malignant bile duct obstruction on quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;47(6):526-31. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318272440e.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9307-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id