Cohort Study Comparing Surgeon Stress, Utilization of Surgical Instruments, Surgical Outcomes According to Surgical Approach for Gastrectomy
NCT ID: NCT04972149
Last Updated: 2021-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-18
2022-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Preoperative Anxiety and Depression on Short-term Postoperative Recovery in Early Gastric Cancer
NCT04599231
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00452751
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956
The Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06929949
Learning Curve and Optimization of Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05715775
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LC
laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments
No interventions assigned to this group
LW
Using wristed laparoscopic instruments (Artisential Maryland dissector, Artisential Fenestrated grasper)
No interventions assigned to this group
RC
Conventional robotic surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
RSS
Use of single site system for reduced port robotic surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
RSP
Use of da Vinci SP system for reduced port robotic surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
RRI
A new surgical robot Revo-i developed by Meerae company in Korea
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hyoung-Il Kim
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yonsei University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Hyoung-Il Kim
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grantcharov PD, Boillat T, Elkabany S, Wac K, Rivas H. Acute mental stress and surgical performance. BJS Open. 2018 Sep 27;3(1):119-125. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.104. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
Kim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.
Lee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Liu ZY, Chen QY, Zhong Q, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P. Is three-dimensional laparoscopic spleen preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer better than that of two-dimensional? Analysis of a prospective clinical research study. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3425-3435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06640-7. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Niitsu H, Hirabayashi N, Yoshimitsu M, Mimura T, Taomoto J, Sugiyama Y, Murakami S, Saeki S, Mukaida H, Takiyama W. Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surg Today. 2013 Mar;43(3):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0313-7. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G. Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;147(8):709-14. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508.
Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Fabrizi L, Colantonio L, Cimino M, Sindico S, Forastiere E. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2759-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, Cho M, Lim SH, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1770-1777. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5851-1. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2021-0409
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.