Retinal Surgery With or Without Anesthesiologist, Comparison of Surgeon and Patient's Comfort

NCT ID: NCT04956237

Last Updated: 2024-07-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-09

Study Completion Date

2024-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Retinal surgeries are now performed in some hospitals with sub-Tenon anesthesia to replace conventional peribulbar anesthesia. The advantages of performing the surgery with Tenonian anesthesia can be: the cost reduced due to the non-intervention of an anesthesiologist, no pre-operative anesthetic consultation, no waiting period for the effectiveness of the peribulbar anesthesia (15-20min to have the effect of anesthesia of the eye). In addition, there are more numerous and dangerous complications of peribulbar anesthesia than sub-Tenonian anesthesia, however it allows the eye to remain stationary and to perform precise surgery safely, as long as the patient does not move his head.

Performing a sub-Tenonian anesthesia also makes it possible to carry out surgeries more quickly, this method having an immediate effect and being performed by the surgeon, without the intervention of an anesthesiologist.

The edema effect under the post / conjunctiva swells the area around the eye and allows partial oculomotor limitation. Finally, for the patient, recovery is faster: no sedation or venous route.

To date, however, no study has proven that the surgeon can safely operate on the patient without increased complications compared to peribulbar anesthesia.

This study aims to show that simple sub-Tenonian anesthesia in a short outpatient circuit does not induce more pain or discomfort for the patient than a longer outpatient circuit with bed and anesthesiologist. No studies have been performed on purely local anesthesia without a venous route.

For this, patients operated on at the Foch hospital without an anesthesiologist under subtenon's anesthesia will be compared to patients operated on under peribulbar anesthesia with an anesthesiologist at the Pierre Cherest clinic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retinal Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tenonian surgery

Hospital recruitment with outpatient surgery without the presence of an anesthesiologist, without loco-regional anesthesia and without intravenous route

No interventions assigned to this group

Peribulbar surgery

Gold standard: City recruitment with outpatient surgery with the presence of an anesthesiologist and with loco-regional anesthesia

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years old
* Patients with an indication for retinal surgery
* Not having opposed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Claustrophobia
* Unbalanced psychiatric pathology
* Inability to lie down
* Deprived of liberty or under guardianship.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Foch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Pierre Cherest

Neuilly-sur-Seine, , France

Site Status

Foch Hospital

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020_0138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.