SLAP Injury of the Shoulder Joint: Application Value of Deep Learning in Diagnosis
NCT ID: NCT04953026
Last Updated: 2021-07-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-01
2022-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Research on Optimization of Rotator Cuff Injury Diagnosis Plan
NCT04973995
Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior ( SLAP) From Type II to Type IV
NCT07113821
Scapular Positioning in Standing Position Using Sonography
NCT04449146
Sonographic Evaluation of the Effect of Shoulder Orthosis on the Subluxation in Stroke Patients
NCT02102269
Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior (SLAP) Lesion Type IV
NCT06300190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Recognition and segmentation of glenoid lip of shoulder joint based on DenseNet: the labrum is recognized by DenseNet in the selected image. The labelimg software based on Python was used to locate the labrum coordinates and then input them into Python for recognition learning. All the data were divided into a training set (70% and 30% of the training set were selected as the verification set). The remaining 30% was used as the test set to evaluate the accuracy of model recognition. After identifying the labrum structure, the labrum structure is locally cut and enlarged to remove the redundant information and improve the recognition efficiency and accuracy. Finally, input the result to the next step.
3. Recognition and grading of shoulder SLAP injury based on 3D-CNN: recognition and grading of input data through 3D-CNN model. 3D-CNN is divided into eight layers: input layer, hard wire layer H1, convolution layer C2, downsampling layer S3, convolution layer C4, downsampling layer S5, convolution layer C6 and output layer. 3D-CNN constructs a cube by stacking multiple consecutive frames and then uses a 3D convolution kernel in the cube. Through this structure, the feature images in the convolution layer will be connected with multiple adjacent frames in the previous layer to realize the information acquisition of continuous images. Similarly, the data is divided into a training set (70%, and then 30% of the training set is selected as the verification set), and the remaining 30% is used as the test set to evaluate the classification accuracy to identify whether there is labrum injury and grade the image with injury.
4. Establish CNN combined model: after establishing the model for the axial and oblique coronal view according to the above process (1-3), according to the output characteristics of the CNN classification model, predict the probability of different grades before the output results, and the output results are based on these probabilities to select the expression form of the maximum possible probability. Our combined model averages the probabilities of these different classifications, calculates the final prediction probability, and then obtains the final joint model. The test set of the third step (including the mixed data of axial and coronal images) was used to verify the joint model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Normal control group-Grade 0
Arthroscopic examination of the labrum was normal, and the labrum was intact without injury or tear.
Diagnositic test
The results of shoulder arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object.
Ligament injury -Grade 1
Arthroscopic examination of the shoulder showed labrum degeneration or injury, but no local or complete tear.
Diagnositic test
The results of shoulder arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object.
Ligament tear-Grade 2
Arthroscopy of the shoulder revealed partial or complete loss of labrum.
Diagnositic test
The results of shoulder arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diagnositic test
The results of shoulder arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. MR of the shoulder joint was performed within 3 months before the operation and the image quality was good;
3. Arthroscopic operation was performed in our hospital, and the operation records were complete.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unclear image, serious artifact, or incomplete clinical data.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2020458
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.