Role of Dynamic Ultrasound in Assessment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT06754592
Last Updated: 2025-01-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-12-26
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dynamic Ultrasound in Shoulder Impingement
NCT04290468
Ultrasound Versus Kinesiotaping in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
NCT05779033
Dual-target Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
NCT04219527
The Effect of Phonophoresis in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.
NCT04676919
Ultrasound-guided Anterior Hydrodilatation in Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT05194852
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When assessing a patient with signs of impingement, it is essential to evaluate the condition of the rotator cuff and the extent of any tears. This information allows surgeons to create an effective strategy for ongoing patient management.
Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are effective tools for diagnosing rotator cuff disorders, especially when it comes to detecting full-thickness rotator cuff tears, due to their high sensitivity. However, their overall sensitivity for identifying partial rotator cuff tears and tendinopathy is lower. Impingement-related conditions, such as bursitis and changes or ruptures in tendons, can be visualized using a linear sonography.
Ultrasound (US) offers several advantages over MRI. One key benefit is that ultrasonography is a dynamic form of imaging, while MRI provides static images. US is also portable, better tolerated by patients, and allows for direct interaction with patients; this enables patients to point to the symptomatic area, which can enhance diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, ultrasound is less time-consuming, more cost-effective, and more readily available in secondary and tertiary care settings compared to MRI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound
evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic high-resolution ultrasonography in identifying various abnormalities of the shoulder impingement syndrome, especially the subacromial type, and to determine the added value of dynamic ultrasonography compared to static examination of such cases. Furthermore, we will compare these findings to MRI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robier Isaac Ibrahim
Role of dynamic Ultrasound in assessment of shoulder impingement syndrome
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sohag university hospital
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Mohamed Z Ali
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Magdy M Amin, Professor
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med--24-12-11MS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.