Effectiveness of Posterior Capsule Stretching and Posterior Mobilization on Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT05402709

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-26

Study Completion Date

2017-06-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome is one of the most common shoulder pathologies causing shoulder pain, functional disability and reduced quality of life. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of posterior capsule stretching and posterior mobilization on shoulder joint functions in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome is one of the most common shoulder pathologies causing shoulder pain, functional disability, and reduced quality of life. This study investigated the effectiveness of posterior capsule stretching and posterior mobilization on shoulder joint functions in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

74 patients with SIS were enrolled, 58 were included, but 50 completed the study. Also, 30 healthy individuals were included and completed the study. The introductory characteristics of cases with the sociodemographic survey, pain intensity with VAS, upper extremity function with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and Modified Constant Murley Score, upper extremity disability and health situation with Quick Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, the evaluation of musculoskeletal symptoms with Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, range of motion with a goniometer, shoulder muscle strength with myometer, grip strength with dynamometer and pinch meter and posterior capsule tightness with a tapeline. Individuals were divided into three different groups posterior mobilisation, posterior capsule, and control group. While participants included in the mobilization group were given classical stretching and strengthening and home exercise programs in addition to posterior mobilization, for the capsule stretching group, classical stretching and strengthening and home exercise program were given in addition to posterior capsule stretching exercise, and no exercise program was given to the control group and only posterior capsule tightness evaluation was applied.

In this study, while there was found a statistically significant difference between both groups in the Constant score and involved part External Rotation range of motion (p\<0,05), a statistically significant difference was not observed in the evaluation of muscle strength, grip strength and posterior capsule tightness (p\>0,05). In the participants who applied mobilization, the functional capacity of the shoulder joint was increased more than those of the capsule stretching.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Individuals were randomly divided into 3 different groups as posterior mobilisation, posterior capsule stretching and control group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Posterior mobilization group

Posterior mobilization, classical stretching, strengthening exercises were applied and home exercise program were given

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Posterior mobilisation technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Posterior mobilisation technique were applied

Posterior capsule stretching

Posterior capsule stretching, classical stretching, strengthening exercises were applied and home exercise program were given

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Posterior capsule stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Posterior capsule stretching were applied

Control group

No treatment was given, only assessment of posterior capsule tightness was applied.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Posterior mobilisation technique

Posterior mobilisation technique were applied

Intervention Type OTHER

Posterior capsule stretching

Posterior capsule stretching were applied

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* To be between 30-60 years old
* Positive Neer, Hawkins-Kennedy impingement tests
* Painful arch and minimal limitation during active flexion and abduction movements in the glenohumeral joint area or proximal arm
* Symptoms lasting longer than 1 month

Exclusion Criteria

* Adhesive capsulitis,
* Rotator cuff tears,
* Calcific tendinitis findings in radiology,
* Having a heart disease
* Presence of neurological diseases,
* Cognitive and mental problems that will affect understanding,
* Cervical radiculopathies,
* Presence of inflammatory joint diseases,
* Surgical intervention on the same shoulder in the last 12 months,
* To have had physical therapy on the same shoulder in the last 3 months,
* Presence of instability or previous dislocation history.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yeditepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ebru Akbuğa Koç

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-11/03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.