Effectiveness of Posterior Capsule Stretching and Posterior Mobilization on Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT05402709
Last Updated: 2022-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-26
2017-06-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Acute Effects of Different Stretching Methods in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT03246867
A Comparison of the Long Term Effects of the Traditional and Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercise in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT04660682
The Effect of Isolytic and Static Stretching Training in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT03246698
The Effect of Humeral Head Depressor Strengthening in Individuals With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT07228455
Scapular Mobilization Versus Capsular Stretch
NCT06705426
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
74 patients with SIS were enrolled, 58 were included, but 50 completed the study. Also, 30 healthy individuals were included and completed the study. The introductory characteristics of cases with the sociodemographic survey, pain intensity with VAS, upper extremity function with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and Modified Constant Murley Score, upper extremity disability and health situation with Quick Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, the evaluation of musculoskeletal symptoms with Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, range of motion with a goniometer, shoulder muscle strength with myometer, grip strength with dynamometer and pinch meter and posterior capsule tightness with a tapeline. Individuals were divided into three different groups posterior mobilisation, posterior capsule, and control group. While participants included in the mobilization group were given classical stretching and strengthening and home exercise programs in addition to posterior mobilization, for the capsule stretching group, classical stretching and strengthening and home exercise program were given in addition to posterior capsule stretching exercise, and no exercise program was given to the control group and only posterior capsule tightness evaluation was applied.
In this study, while there was found a statistically significant difference between both groups in the Constant score and involved part External Rotation range of motion (p\<0,05), a statistically significant difference was not observed in the evaluation of muscle strength, grip strength and posterior capsule tightness (p\>0,05). In the participants who applied mobilization, the functional capacity of the shoulder joint was increased more than those of the capsule stretching.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Posterior mobilization group
Posterior mobilization, classical stretching, strengthening exercises were applied and home exercise program were given
Posterior mobilisation technique
Posterior mobilisation technique were applied
Posterior capsule stretching
Posterior capsule stretching, classical stretching, strengthening exercises were applied and home exercise program were given
Posterior capsule stretching
Posterior capsule stretching were applied
Control group
No treatment was given, only assessment of posterior capsule tightness was applied.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Posterior mobilisation technique
Posterior mobilisation technique were applied
Posterior capsule stretching
Posterior capsule stretching were applied
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Positive Neer, Hawkins-Kennedy impingement tests
* Painful arch and minimal limitation during active flexion and abduction movements in the glenohumeral joint area or proximal arm
* Symptoms lasting longer than 1 month
Exclusion Criteria
* Rotator cuff tears,
* Calcific tendinitis findings in radiology,
* Having a heart disease
* Presence of neurological diseases,
* Cognitive and mental problems that will affect understanding,
* Cervical radiculopathies,
* Presence of inflammatory joint diseases,
* Surgical intervention on the same shoulder in the last 12 months,
* To have had physical therapy on the same shoulder in the last 3 months,
* Presence of instability or previous dislocation history.
30 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yeditepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ebru Akbuğa Koç
Principal investigator
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-11/03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.