Dynamic Ultrasound in Shoulder Impingement

NCT ID: NCT04290468

Last Updated: 2020-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

* To evaluate the role of dynamic ultrasound in evaluation patient with clinically suspected shoulder joint impingement.
* To assess the added value of dynamic ultrasonography to the static examination of patients with clinically suspected impingement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Shoulder impingement syndromes and degenerative rotator cuff (RC) disease represent the main causes of shoulder pain . Impingement is classified into four types, depending on the site of soft-tissue entrapment: sub acromial, sub coracoid, poster superior inner and anterosuperior inner impingement. The sub acromial impingement syndrome is by far the most common in practice. . The clinical symptoms of sub acromial impingement include nocturnal pain and progressive, limited range of motion. At clinical examination, there is a painful area at 80-120° elevation, which is worsened during downward movements Osteophytes, or an abnormal shape of the acromion, sub acromial spurs, and the acromioclavicular joint, are common causes of compression at the rotator cuff and the overlying subacromial-subdeltoid bursa . Ultrasonography (US) is a commonly performed examination for shoulder impingement, recommended by experts as the first-choice technique to evaluate various shoulder diseases. Shoulder impingement is the most common and well-recognized indication for dynamic US in the shoulder.

Dynamic evaluation can be done by shoulder abduction or flexion with the probe placed at the end of the acromion in the coronal plane or in the sagittal plane. The two important points to be checked for shoulder impingement are the humeral head depression and tendon/bursal impingement . Because humeral head depression is essential to make enough space for the rotator cuff to slide beneath the acromion, the center of the humeral head normally moves inferiorly in the latter half of the cycle during shoulder abduction. When the humeral head does not move inferiorly or abnormally moves superiorly, the space for the rotator cuffs and the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa decreases and subacromial impingement can occur .

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently considered the reference standard for imaging of shoulder disorders. The strength of MRI lies in its ability to assess sonographically inaccessible areas such as labrum, deep parts of various ligaments, capsule, and areas obscured by bone . MRI is the imaging study of choice for classifying tendon retraction and assessing the shoulder musculature. Its main disadvantage is being a static evaluation of the shoulder joint . There are several advantages of Ultrasonography over MRI. Ultrasonography has the benefit of being a dynamic form of imaging as compared to the static MRI. Ultrasonography is portable, quick, and a more cost-effective method. It is also better tolerated by the patient and allows interaction with the patient, who can point at the symptomatic area, thus optimizing the diagnostic yield.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Impingement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dynamic ultrasound

The ultrasound examination will be carried out blinded to the results of MRI using the Affiniti 70 ultrasound machine by Philips (USA) via a 5-12MHz linear transducer.

MRI was performed on a high field system (1.5 Tesla) magnet units (Philips Acheiva).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MRI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* The following categories of patient will be excluded from the study.

1. History of previous shoulder surgery.
2. History of joint dislocation.
3. Fracture to the shoulder girdle.
4. Patient with contraindication to MRI.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marwa Ismail Ahmed Mohammed

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marwa Mohammed

Role: CONTACT

01012561056

Noha Attia

Role: CONTACT

01065742341

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rowbotham EL, Grainger AJ. VIDEO: Ultrasound Evaluation of External Shoulder Impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):W122. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19534. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29927333 (View on PubMed)

Coats-Thomas MS, Massimini DF, Warner JJP, Seitz AL. In Vivo Evaluation of Subacromial and Internal Impingement Risk in Asymptomatic Individuals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;97(9):659-665. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000940.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29613881 (View on PubMed)

Pesquer L, Borghol S, Meyer P, Ropars M, Dallaudiere B, Abadie P. Multimodality imaging of subacromial impingement syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Jul;47(7):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2875-y. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29445933 (View on PubMed)

Soker G, Gulek B, Soker E, Kaya O, Inan I, Arslan M, Esen K, Memis D, Yilmaz C. Sonographic assessment of subacromial bursa distension during arm abduction: establishing a threshold value in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Apr;45(2):287-294. doi: 10.1007/s10396-017-0839-9. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29075914 (View on PubMed)

Do HK, Lim JY. Ultrasonographic Evaluation and Feasibility of Posterosuperior Internal Impingement Syndrome: A Case Series. PM R. 2017 Jan;9(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27317919 (View on PubMed)

Daghir AA, Sookur PA, Shah S, Watson M. Dynamic ultrasound of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa in patients with shoulder impingement: a comparison with normal volunteers. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(9):1047-53. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1295-z. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21997670 (View on PubMed)

Michener LA, Subasi Yesilyaprak SS, Seitz AL, Timmons MK, Walsworth MK. Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):363-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2542-8. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23736252 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ultrasound in shoulder

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.