Physiology as Guidance to Evaluate the Direct Impact of Coronary Lesion Treatment: The PREDICT Study
NCT ID: NCT04929496
Last Updated: 2025-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
221 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-10
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiological Assessment of Severe Coronary Stenosis for Informing Planned PCI
NCT05491668
Physiology & Optical Coherence in STEMI
NCT03992924
OFDI-Quantified Intracoronary Thrombus, Antiplatelet Pretreatment Effect and Myocardial Reperfusion
NCT03342521
A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Impact of Physiology Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Guided PCI in STEMI Patients Without Undergoing Primary PCI
NCT04996277
Pre-procedural 3DCT Versus Angiography Guided PCI for Ostial Right Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT05172323
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
FFR is easily measured during routine coronary angiography by using a pressure wire to calculate the ratio between coronary pressure distal to a coronary artery stenosis and aortic pressure under conditions of maximum myocardial hyperemia. this ratio represents the potential decrease in coronary flow distal o the coronary stenosis. Recently, other physiology ratios called non-hyperemic ratios (NHPR) have been developed.
Both types of physiology measures (FFR and NHPR) have been increasingly used in cardiac catheterization laboratories as a diagnostic tool. They provide a quantitative assessment of the functional severity of a coronary artery stenosis identified during coronary angiography and cardiac catheterization. However, they are underutilized as tools for the assessment of success of coronary interventions.
The PREDICT study is a pilot study which aims to prospectively determine whether post-PCI physiology guidance is associated with better clinical outcomes than standard angiographic guidance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Angiographical guidance only
Standard of care
No interventions assigned to this group
Post-PCI FFR guidance
Post-PCI Fractional Flow Reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios measurement
post-PCI FFR
final invasive physiology measurements after successful stent implantation, followed by functional optimization if physiology indexes remain positive.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
post-PCI FFR
final invasive physiology measurements after successful stent implantation, followed by functional optimization if physiology indexes remain positive.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Successful (\< 30% diameter stenosis and normal TIMI 3 flow post-stenting) and uncomplicated PCI
* All treated lesions stented with drug-eluting stents (except side-branches of bifurcations)
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to aspirin, thienopyridines or ticagrelor precluding treatment for 30 days
* Sub-optimal PCI result ( \>30% residual diameter stenosis and/or \<TIMI3 flow) or peri-procedural complications
* Acute ST-Elevation MI (culprit lesion)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Opsens, Inc.
INDUSTRY
International Chair on Interventional Cardiology and Transradial Approach
OTHER
Laval University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Olivier F. Bertrand
Study Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olivier F. Bertrand, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
International Chair on Interventional Cardiology and Transradial Approach
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IUCPQ - Laval Hospital
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ulacia Flores P, Cieza T, Ouarrak S, Ruhl A, Mengi S, De Larochelliere R, Garcia-Labbe D, Dery JP, Poulin A, Larose E, Noel B, Nguyen CM, Paradis JM, Bertrand OF. Randomized Study Comparing Angiography Guidance With Physiology Guidance After PCI: The EASY-PREDICT Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;18(7):e015165. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015165. Epub 2025 May 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EASY-PREDICT pilot study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.