Assessing the Accuracy of the OptoWire DeuxTM in a Wire to Wire Comparison
NCT ID: NCT03815032
Last Updated: 2020-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Drift-Reduction for Improved FFR Using Fiberoptic Technology (DRIFT) Study
NCT03848650
Opsens Optowire for Fractional Flow Reserve - The O2 Pilot Study
NCT02144090
Sensor-equipped Ultrathin Pressure Microcatheter Versus Pressure Wire for FFR Measurement
NCT03541577
Comparison of Devices Evaluating Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Arteries
NCT03052803
Assessment of Catheter-based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement
NCT02577484
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Optowire Deux FFR assessment (1)
A total of 45 consecutive patients will be recruited:
group 1 (n=30): To assess the differences in FFR measurements (drift) made by the OptoWire Deux FFRTM guidewire by comparison of simultaneous data of two different OptoWire DeuxTM guidewires
Drift assessment of OptoWire Deux FFR wire (1)
Simultaneous data of two different OptoWire DeuxTM guidewires (group 1) to assess a single coronary stenosis and detect any difference if any.
Optowire Deux FFR assessment (2)
group 2 (n=15): To assess the differences in FFR measurements (drift) obtained from an OptoWire DeuxTM FFR guidewire and compare it to the FFR measurement by a VERRATATM guidewire
Drift assessment of OptoWire Deux FFR wire (2)
Simultaneous data of one Optowire Deux TM guide wires and one VERRATA-TM FFR wire (group 2) to assess a single coronary stenosis and detect any difference if any.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Drift assessment of OptoWire Deux FFR wire (1)
Simultaneous data of two different OptoWire DeuxTM guidewires (group 1) to assess a single coronary stenosis and detect any difference if any.
Drift assessment of OptoWire Deux FFR wire (2)
Simultaneous data of one Optowire Deux TM guide wires and one VERRATA-TM FFR wire (group 2) to assess a single coronary stenosis and detect any difference if any.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Opsens, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samer Mansour, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pothineni NV, Shah NN, Rochlani Y, Nairooz R, Raina S, Leesar MA, Uretsky BF, Hakeem A. U.S. Trends in Inpatient Utilization of Fractional Flow Reserve and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 16;67(6):732-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.042. No abstract available.
Fearon WF. Percutaneous coronary intervention should be guided by fractional flow reserve measurement. Circulation. 2014 May 6;129(18):1860-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004300. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18.238
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.