Validation of vFFR as Compared to FFR to Guide Revascularization of Non-culprit Lesions in STEMI Patients
NCT ID: NCT05698719
Last Updated: 2023-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
111 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-22
2023-06-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
iFR-guided Revascularization in STEMI
NCT03561389
Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Selective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT02670005
Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-FFR Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve
NCT03045601
CT-Angiography Plaque Characteristics and Events in Deferral Patients by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve
NCT06508697
FLOW Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multi-vessel ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT02943954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Angiography-based FFR has the potential to guide complete revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease, thereby reducing the need for invasive pressure wires and hyperemic agents. However, dedicated data regarding the diagnostic performance of acute-setting angiography-based FFR, with acute-setting FFR and NHPR as the reference standards, is currently lacking for this subset of patients.
Of note, FFR slightly underestimates the hemodynamic significance of non-culprit lesions in the acute setting due to microvascular constriction and a blunted hyperemic response, while NHPR slightly overestimates the functional lesion significance. Angiography-based fractional flow reserve is not affected by changes in the microvasculature. Potential discrepancies between acute-setting angiography-based FFR, FFR and NHPR might be explained by the microvascular state, expressed as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR).
Main objectives:
1. To study the diagnostic performance of acute-setting vFFR for the physiological assessment of intermediate non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients, with acute-setting FFR as the reference standard.
2. To study the diagnostic performance of acute-setting vFFR for the physiological assessment of intermediate non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients, with acute-setting RFR as the reference standards.
3. To study the impact of CFR and IMR on the potential discrepancies between acute-setting vFFR, FFR and RFR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
STEMI patients undergoing physiological assessment of a non-culprit lesion
vFFR, FFR, RFR, dPR, CFR and IMR
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least one intermediate non-culprit lesion (50-90% diameter stenosis by visual estimation or online QCA) in a non-infarct related artery (reference vessel diameter \>2.00 mm) for which invasive pressure wire-based physiological assessment is deemed feasible and indicated.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention involving the non-culprit vessel.
* Ostial left main or ostial right coronary artery lesion.
* Excessive overlap, foreshortening or tortuosity precluding vFFR computation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joost Daemen
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joost Daemen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mariusz Tomaniak, MD PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van der Eijk JA, Groenland FTW, Scoccia A, Ziedses des Plantes AC, Huang J, Nuis RJ, Wilschut JM, den Dekker WK, Diletti R, Kardys I, Tomaniak M, Van Mieghem NM, Daemen J. Validation of angiography-based FFR in non-culprit vessels of patients presenting with STEMI. Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02729-x. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAST STEMI II
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.