Safety of Negative FrActional Flow Reserve in Patients With ChallEnging Lesions

NCT ID: NCT02590926

Last Updated: 2017-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

285 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-26

Study Completion Date

2017-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) has recently emerged and has been largely validated as a safe and efficacious way of ischemia testing for patients with stable angina. The new recently ESC guidelines have strongly suggested a FFR based approach for patients with stable angina, also for those with challenging lesions like left main disease, severe multivessel stenosis for heart failure patients and those with single remaining vessels although left main disease and an ejection fraction less than 30% are exclusion criteria of the randomized controlled trials on this topic. Consequently the investigators performed a prospective multicenter study to understand the safety and efficacy of a FFR based approach for these patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present is a multicenter prospective study enrolling all patients with stable angina and/or documented ischemia presenting with:

* An angiographic stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% of the left main
* Any proximal descending anterior with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90%
* Two or three vessel disease with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% and a left ventricle ejection fraction less than 40%
* Single remaining patent coronary artery with stenosis \>50% and less than 90%

In all of these patients FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) will be performed according to guidelines and stenting will be performed or deferred according to the result of this test. Other techniques, like iFR, IVUS and OCT will be left at the operators' choice and will be recorded. MACE (a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis) will be the primary end point, while its single components will be the secondary ones.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients

patients with stable angina and/or documented ischemia presenting with:

* An angiographic stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% of the left main
* Any proximal descending anterior with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90%
* Two or three vessel disease with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% and a left ventricle ejection fraction less than 40%
* Single remaining patent coronary artery with stenosis \>50% and less than 90%

Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ratio of maximum blood flow to the myocardium with coronary stenosis present, to the maximum equivalent blood flow without stenosis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial

The ratio of maximum blood flow to the myocardium with coronary stenosis present, to the maximum equivalent blood flow without stenosis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* An angiographic stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% of the left main
* Any proximal descending anterior with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90%
* Two or three vessel disease with a stenosis of more than 50% and less than 90% and a left ventricle ejection fraction less than 40%
* Single remaining patent coronary artery with stenosis \>50% and less than 90%

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe aortic stenosis
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Claudio Moretti

Head, Cardiology Cath Lab

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, Sood A, Balachandran K, Das R, Junejo S, Ahmed N, Lee MM, Shaukat A, O'Donnell A, Nam J, Briggs A, Henderson R, McConnachie A, Berry C; FAMOUS-NSTEMI investigators. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 7;36(2):100-11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu338. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25179764 (View on PubMed)

De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd K, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Limacher A, Nuesch E, Juni P; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1208-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25176289 (View on PubMed)

Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25173339 (View on PubMed)

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19144937 (View on PubMed)

Barbero U, D'Ascenzo F, Campo G, Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Menozzi M, Jimenez Diaz VA, Cerrato E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Ielasi A, Rognoni A, Fineschi M, Kanji R, Jaguszewski MJ, Picchi A, Ando G, Soraci E, Mancone M, Sardella G, Calcagno S, Gallo F, Huczek Z, Krakowian M, Verardi R, Montefusco A, Omede P, Lococo M, Moretti C, D'Amico M, Rigattieri S, Gaita F, Rinaldi M, Escaned J. Safety of FFR-guided revascularisation deferral in Anatomically prognostiC diseasE (FACE: CARDIOGROUP V STUDY): A prospective multicentre study. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29937300 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

370/2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.