Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI
NCT ID: NCT03084367
Last Updated: 2022-05-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-20
2020-02-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Agreement of iFR and QFR.
NCT03420131
Validation of Stenosis Assessment by Coronary Artery Computed Tomography Against Invasive Measurements of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Significant Coronary Artery Stenoses
NCT00817102
Prognostic Implications of Physiologic Investigation After Revascularization With Stent
NCT04684043
Index of Microcirculatory Resistance After Immediate Versus Deferred Stenting in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT03238508
Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Non Culprit Lesions in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT02869906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
iFR post angiographically successful PCI
iFR pullback
iFR pullback assessment post angiographically successful PCI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
iFR pullback
iFR pullback assessment post angiographically successful PCI
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects presenting with stable angina, silent ischemia or non-ST-elevation ACS (acute coronary syndrome) (unstable angina or biomarker positive)
3. Single vessel CAD with at least 2 separate lesions (≥10 mm apart) of ≥40% stenosis or a single long lesion of ≥20mm OR multi-vessel CAD, defined as at least 2 vessels with ≥40% stenosis
4. Pre-PCI iFR performed in all vessels intended for PCI
5. Pre-PCI iFR of \<0.90 of at least 1 stenosis
6. Subjects are able and willing to comply with scheduled visits and tests and to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Acute STEMI (ST-elevated Myocardial Infarction) within the past 7 days
3. Cardiogenic shock (sustained (\>10 min) systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg in absence of inotropic support or the presence of an intra-aortic balloon pump).
4. Ionotropic or temporary pacing requirement
5. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias
6. Prior CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Graft)
7. Known ejection fraction ≤30%
8. Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO)
9. Known severe mitral or aortic stenosis.
10. Any known medical comorbidity resulting in life expectancy \< 12 months.
11. Participation in any investigational study that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.
12. Known severe renal insufficiency (eGFR \<30 ml/min/1.72 m2).
13. TIMI flow \<3 at baseline
14. Intra-coronary thrombus on baseline angiography
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke Clinical Research Institute
OTHER
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York
OTHER
Volcano Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Becky Inderbitzen, MSE
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Philips (Volcano)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Medical Center
Long Beach, California, United States
Colorado Heart and Vascular
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Rockford CV Associates
Rockford, Illinois, United States
Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
South Side Hospital
Bay Shore, New York, United States
Northshore Hospital
Manhasset, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/NewYork Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital -Weill Cornell
New York, New York, United States
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, United States
St Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, United States
SUNY- Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vidant Medical Center
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Wellmont CVA Heart Insitute
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
VA North Texas Health Care
Dallas, Texas, United States
Aurora St Lukes Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
AMC Amsterdam
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Basildon Univeristy Hospital
Basildon, , United Kingdom
Royal Bournemouth hospital
Bournemouth, , United Kingdom
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Exeter, , United Kingdom
Imperial College of London- Hammersmith Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jeremias A, Davies JE, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Schneider J, Tang K, Talwar S, Marques K, Shammas NW, Gruberg L, Seto A, Samady H, Sharp A, Ali ZA, Mintz G, Patel M, Stone GW. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):1991-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.054.
Patel MR, Jeremias A, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Zhang Z, Schneider J, Tang K, Talwar S, Marques K, Shammas NW, Gruberg L, Seto A, Samady H, Sharp ASP, Ali ZA, Mintz G, Davies J, Stone GW. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.042.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
160101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.