Improvement Assessment of Coronary Flow Dysfunction Using Fundamental Fluid Dynamics
NCT ID: NCT01719016
Last Updated: 2025-05-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
68 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-08-31
2025-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CT Coronary Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics
NCT01189331
Coronary Revascularization Assessed by Stress PET
NCT02931331
Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses
NCT02328820
Comprehensive Assessment of Morphometric, Functional, Biomechanical and Biological Interactions Between Atherosclerotic Plaque and Platelets Within the Stenosed Coronary Artery
NCT06275399
Angio-based Fractional Flow Reserve to Predict Adverse Events After Stent Implantation
NCT02811796
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiac PET, Coronary catheterization
Cardiac PET scan:
1. Injection of N-13 Ammonia radionuclide. 2 doses of 10 milliCuries and 20 milliCuries each.
2. Injection of Lexiscan.
Coronary catheterization:
1. Pressure and flow readings using Combowire
2. Injection of Adenosine.
Cardiac PET, Coronary catheterization
Patients would under go a Cardiac rest and stress PET scan and include the following drug administration:
1. N-13 Ammonia radionuclide - Two doses, 10 mCi for rest, 20 mCi for stress
2. Lexiscan - stress agent for PET scan
Patients would also undergo Coronary catheterization including the following drug administration and device usage:
1. Combowire to obtain pressure and flow readings on Combomap machine (Volcano Therapeutics, CA).
2. Adenosine - stress agent during catheterization, 140 ug/Kg/min
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac PET, Coronary catheterization
Patients would under go a Cardiac rest and stress PET scan and include the following drug administration:
1. N-13 Ammonia radionuclide - Two doses, 10 mCi for rest, 20 mCi for stress
2. Lexiscan - stress agent for PET scan
Patients would also undergo Coronary catheterization including the following drug administration and device usage:
1. Combowire to obtain pressure and flow readings on Combomap machine (Volcano Therapeutics, CA).
2. Adenosine - stress agent during catheterization, 140 ug/Kg/min
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients referred to a stress test by a Cardiologist
* Acute Chest pain, as per patient input.
* Risk Assessment with prior test results and/or previous history of known chronic stable CAD.
* Borderline or discordant stress testing where obstructive CAD remains a concern.
* New or worsening symptoms- Abnormal coronary angiography or abnormal prior stress imaging study.
* Coronary stenosis or anatomic abnormality of uncertain significance.
* In absence of reliable diagnostic information from another imaging modality.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease with baseline serum creatinine greater than 2.5 gm/dL.
* History of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
* Significant co-morbid condition that is medically unstable and would make coronary angiography prohibitive or contraindicated.
* Pregnant women.
* Incapacitated for Consent
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cincinnati
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rupak K. Banerjee
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rupak K Banerjee, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati , CVAMC
Mohamed Effat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univesity of Cincinnati, University Hospital
Imran Arif, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati and University Hospital
Hanan Kerr, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cincinnati Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Banerjee RK, Ramadurai S, Manegaonkar SM, Rao MB, Rakkimuthu S, Effat MA. Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases. Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:689517. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.689517. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-05-05-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.