Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-15
2022-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Scapular Stabilization vs Functional Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain
NCT06049316
Comparative Effects of Myofascial Decompression and Positional Release Therapies in Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
NCT05947214
Effects of Scapular Stabilization Program in Patients Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
NCT05392023
Cervical Stabilization Exercises on Respiratory Strength in Chronic Neck Pain
NCT04674891
Comparison of Facet Oscillatory Mobilization and Mobilization With Movement in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06927154
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Follow-up on daily basis
Patient receiving treatments on daily basis (5 days a week)
Conventional physical therapy.
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
Follow-up on alternate days
Patients receiving treatment on alternate days (3 days a week)
Conventional physical therapy.
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional physical therapy.
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with neck pain with a score of 4-10 on the numeric pain rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or metabolic bone disease.
* History of cervical spine injury or surgery.
* Patients presented with disc herniation.
* Cervical instability
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Imran Amjad, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences
Mansehra, KPK, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cai C, Ming G, Ng LY. Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from home-based mechanical cervical traction. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):912-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1673-6. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Sleijser-Koehorst MLS, Coppieters MW, Heymans MW, Rooker S, Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM. Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2710-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5777-8. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/0876 Seerat Rashid
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.