Real World Evidence with the Debritom+ TM Novel Micro Water Jet Technology At a Single Wound Center

NCT ID: NCT04920253

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-29

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, single-blinded, single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess rate and frequency of wound healing and associated financial savings, when using Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care as a choice of debridement method, where both arms follow normal wound care practice in use of advanced wound care treatments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess the clinical performance of the Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care (sharp debridement using scalpel) in the real world practice of wound care management in a single center trial by collecting data on wound healing rates over time, success of advanced wound care treatments, and downstream financial costs in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, dehisced surgical wounds and traumatic wounds. Medaxis debritom+TM is an advanced micro fluid jet FDA registered Class II device, which will be used within the cleared intended use of wound therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Venous Leg Ulcer Surgical Wound Dehiscence Traumatic Wounds

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, single-blinded, single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Control and Treatment Arms
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Prescribing Physician will be blinded. A site blinded physician will confirm the Prescribing Physician's initial assessment of wound healing and a final blinded Independent Adjudicator will review baseline and final images to assess and provide confirmation of healing.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

debritom+

Group 1: Medaxis debritom+

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Study Device Debridement

Intervention Type DEVICE

debritom+ water jet debridement

Sharp Scalpel

Group 2: SOC (Sharp Scalpel Debridement)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SOC Debridement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sharp Scalpel

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Study Device Debridement

debritom+ water jet debridement

Intervention Type DEVICE

SOC Debridement

Sharp Scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

General

Potential subjects are required to meet all of the following criteria for enrollment into the study and subsequent randomization:

1. At least 18 years old.
2. The index wound (i.e. current episode of the wound or ulceration) has been present for greater than 4 weeks prior to SV 1 and has had less than 1 year of documented medical treatment, as of the subject's consent for the study participation.
3. The index wound is a minimum of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum of 25 cm2 at SV1.
4. Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with weekly visits.
5. Subject must have read and signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) before study specific screening procedures that are not standard of care are undertaken.

DFU
6. Presence of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) that meets all of the following features:
7. Wagner Grade 1 or 2 (see Appendix A for definitions), including wounds that extend to the ligament, tendon, joint capsule or fascia
8. Without abscess or osteomyelitis
9. The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more DFUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other ulcerations are present on the same foot, they must be more than 2cm distant from index ulcer (edge to edge).
10. The index ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization
11. Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool, or an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative, arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed, evaluating for bi-phasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1 or if monophasic wave forms present must have adequate micro circulation as evidenced by Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool. Note: A documented record of an ABI test performed using the index ulcer leg, within 3 months of SV1 is acceptable for the purposes of this study. Otherwise, this must be completed in the Screening Visit. Acceptable alternatives include arterial Doppler ultrasound evaluating vessels at the level of the ankle, or documented adequate microcirculation as determined by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool.

VLU

Exclusion Criteria

13. The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more VLUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other Ulcerations are present on the same leg, they must be more than 2cm distant from index ulcer.
14. Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool, or an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative, arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed, evaluating for bi-phasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1 or if monophasic wave forms present must have adequate micro circulation as evidenced by Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool. Note: A documented record of an ABI test performed using the index ulcer leg, within 3 months of SV1 is acceptable for the purposes of this study. Otherwise, this must be completed in the Screening Visit. Acceptable alternatives include arterial Doppler ultrasound evaluating vessels at the level of the ankle, or documented adequate microcirculation as determined by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool.

Surgical Dehisced

Traumatic
16. All wounds as per the CDC Surgical Wound Classification, with the exception of Class IV or dirty infected wounds, SSI - Deep incisional and organ space. (See Appendix A for definitions)


General

Potential subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment and subsequent randomization:

1. The index wound, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer or have a positive carcinoma diagnosis.
2. Subject has a history of more than two weeks of treatment with immune-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids \>10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the wound surface within 1 month prior to first SV1, or who receive such medications during the screening period or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.
3. Subject is taking a selective COX-2 inhibitor, such as Celecoxib, for any condition.
4. Subject is on any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding SV1.
5. History of radiation at the wound site (regardless of time since last radiation treatment).
6. Index wound has been previously treated or will need to be treated with any prohibited therapies (See Section 6 of this protocol for a list of prohibited medications and therapies).
7. Subject has a previous diagnosis of HIV, Hepatitis C, or other contagious diseases.
8. Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study or the subject has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment.
9. Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding.
10. Presence of diabetes with poor metabolic control as documented with an HbA1c \>12.0 % within 90 days of randomization.
11. Subject has end-stage renal disease as evidenced by a serum creatinine \> 3.0mg/dL within 6 months of randomization.
12. BMI \>55
13. PAR experiences a \>30% change between SV1 and SV2 DFU
14. Wagner 2 wounds that require debridement of bone.
15. Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected foot as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).

VLU
16. Exclude

1. Secondary post thrombotic
2. Venous Obstruction
3. Venous Obstruction with reflux
4. Lipodermato sclerosis or atrophic blanche
17. Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected leg as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).

Surgical Dehisced
18. Using the Sandy Grading System for Surgical Wound Dehiscence: Wounds Grade 3 where organs are exposed, and 3a, where the infection is severe as deemed by the Principal Investigator.

Traumatic
19. Using CDC Surgical Wound Classification, exclude

1. Class IV - dirty infected wounds
2. SSI - Deep incisional and organ space
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NAMSA

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medaxis, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Melvin B Price, DPM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MCR Health Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MCR Health, Inc.

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sharona Segal-Leibovich

Role: CONTACT

646-369-1570

Amy Jo Johnson

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Melvin B Price, DPM

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEDX-DT-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Use of Extracellular Vesicles (EV) for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT06825884 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1