Study of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge Along With Systemic Antibiotic in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT02427802

Last Updated: 2021-08-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

612 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1.

Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits approximately 10, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized using an electronic randomization system to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. The investigator will be blinded to the patient's treatment group assignment and patients randomized to one of the 2 sponge groups will be blinded as to whether the sponge is active or placebo.

If a patient has multiple infected ulcers, the assigned treatment will be administered to all infected ulcers. The investigator will determine the highest severity ulcer to be used for all efficacy evaluations and will also determine the size and number of sponges (up to 4) that a patient will use in order to completely cover all infected ulcers. The investigator will prescribe an empiric systemic antibiotic therapy based on protocol instructions.

Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. The investigator will stop study treatment if a patient achieves clinical cure by or after the 3rd treatment visit (approximately study day 15). After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits or until ulcer closure. The final efficacy assessments used in the primary efficacy analyses will be obtained at the first follow-up visit approximately 10 days after treatment is stopped. The remaining follow-up visits will occur at approximately 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped when patients will be assessed for ulcer closure and any re-infection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gentamicin sponge group

Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: Up to four collagen sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base) administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gentamicin collagen sponge

Intervention Type DRUG

Up to 4 topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base)

Placebo sponge group

Matching placebo collagen sponge administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching collagen sponge

No sponge group

Systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gentamicin collagen sponge

Up to 4 topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching collagen sponge

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cogenzia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has diabetes mellitus, according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
* Has at least 1 skin ulcer located on or below the malleolus that presents with the following clinical manifestations of a moderate or severe infection based on the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for the "Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections" (CID 2012; 54:132-173) (IDSA guidelines):

* has ≥ 2 manifestations of inflammation (local swelling or induration, erythema, local tenderness or pain, local warmth, purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white or sanguineous secretion)
* has ≥ 1 of the following characteristics: erythema \> 2cm, or involving structures deeper than skin and subcutaneous tissues (e.g. abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, fasciitis) For patients with multiple infected ulcers, the ulcer with the highest Diabetic Foot Infection Wound score (DFI score) must be on or below the malleolus and all infected ulcers must be completely coverable using no more than 4 sponges (sponges cannot be cut).
* Has documented adequate arterial perfusion in the affected limb(s) (either palpable dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses, or normal Doppler wave forms, a toe blood pressure ≥ 45 mm Hg or participation is approved by a vascular surgeon)
* Has received appropriate surgical intervention to remove all necrotic and infected bone if diagnosed with osteomyelitis.
* Has received appropriate surgical debridement to remove all gangrenous tissue.

Exclusion Criteria

* Has a known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin (or other aminoglycosides).
* Has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to bovine collagen.
* Has an ulcer infection which, based upon the patient's known history of hypersensitivity and/or as otherwise in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately treated with at least one of the empiric systemic antibiotic regimens allowed by this protocol.
* Has an ulcer associated with prosthetic material or an implanted device.
* Has received any systemic or topical antibiotic therapy for any reason within 7 days of randomization unless it was administered to specifically treat the infected ulcer(s) and only within 36 hours of randomization.
* Requires or is likely to require treatment with any concomitant topical product or wound therapy before the first follow-up study visit.
* Is severely immunocompromised, or likely to become severely immunocompromised during the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
* Has a history of myasthenia gravis or other neurological condition where gentamicin use is contraindicated as determined by the investigator.
* Has a history of epilepsy.
* Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the past 12 months.
* Has an uncontrolled illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to cause the patient to be withdrawn from the trial or would otherwise interfere with interpreting the results of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Innocoll

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nigel Jones

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Vice President, Global Clinical Operations, Innocoll Pharmaceutical

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Chino, California, United States

Site Status

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Clermont, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cooper City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Muncie, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Great Falls, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

North Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Somerset, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hopewell Junction, New York, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lima, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lampasas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Wenatchee, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INN-TOP-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.