Study of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge Along With Systemic Antibiotic in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT02447172

Last Updated: 2021-09-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

524 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits approximately 10, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized using an electronic randomization system to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. The investigator will be blinded to the patient's treatment group assignment and patients randomized to one of the 2 sponge groups will be blinded as to whether the sponge is active or placebo.

If a patient has multiple infected ulcers, the assigned treatment will be administered to all infected ulcers. The investigator will determine the highest severity ulcer to be used for all efficacy evaluations and will also determine the size and number of sponges (up to 4) that a patient will use in order to completely cover all infected ulcers. The investigator will prescribe an empiric systemic antibiotic therapy based on protocol instructions.

Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. The investigator will stop study treatment if a patient achieves clinical cure by or after the 3rd treatment visit (approximately study day 15). After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits or until ulcer closure. The final efficacy assessments used in the primary efficacy analyses will be obtained at the first follow-up visit approximately 10 days after treatment is stopped. The remaining follow-up visits will occur at approximately 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped when patients will be assessed for ulcer closure and any re-infection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gentamicin sponge group

Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: Up to four collagen sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base) administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gentamicin Collagen sponge

Intervention Type DRUG

Up to 4 topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base)

Placebo sponge group

Matching placebo collagen sponge administered daily, with systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching placebo sponge

No sponge group

Systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care (gentamicin-sponge group) for up to 28 days.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gentamicin Collagen sponge

Up to 4 topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponges each containing 50 mg of gentamicin sulfate (equivalent to 32.5 mg of gentamicin base)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo sponge

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cogenzia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Has a known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin (or other aminoglycosides).

* Has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to bovine collagen.
* Has an ulcer infection which, based upon the patient's known history of hypersensitivity and/or as otherwise in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately treated with at least one of the empiric systemic antibiotic regimens allowed by this protocol.
* Has an ulcer associated with prosthetic material or an implanted device.
* Has received any systemic or topical antibiotic therapy for any reason within 7 days of randomization unless it was administered to specifically treat the infected ulcer(s) and only within 36 hours of randomization.
* Requires or is likely to require treatment with any concomitant topical product or wound therapy before the first follow-up study visit.
* Is severely immunocompromised, or likely to become severely immunocompromised during the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
* Has a history of myasthenia gravis or other neurological condition where gentamicin use is contraindicated as determined by the investigator.
* Has a history of epilepsy.
* Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the past 12 months.
* Has an uncontrolled illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to cause the patient to be withdrawn from the trial or would otherwise interfere with interpreting the results of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Innocoll

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nigel Jones

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Vice President, Global Clinical Operations, Innocoll Pharmaceutical

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Cowra, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Liége, , Belgium

Site Status

Pellenberg, , Belgium

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Třinec, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Hillerød, , Denmark

Site Status

Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Aschaffenburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Fulda, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Bosenheim, Reinland-Pfalz, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Pirna, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Hatvan, , Hungary

Site Status

Orosháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sátoraljaújhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Waterford, , Ireland

Site Status

Campobasso, CB, Italy

Site Status

Abano Terme, PD, Italy

Site Status

Pistoia, Point, Italy

Site Status

Pavia, PV, Italy

Site Status

Bassano del Grappa, VI, Italy

Site Status

Almere Stad, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Studzionka, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Zabrze, , Poland

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Ľubochňa, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenćín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trnava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain

Site Status

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Manises, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Bradford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Burton-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Derby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lancaster, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Merthyr, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Czechia Denmark Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Netherlands Poland Slovakia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INN-TOP-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.