A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot
NCT ID: NCT04564443
Last Updated: 2024-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
222 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-11
2024-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real World Evidence with the Debritom+ TM Novel Micro Water Jet Technology At a Single Wound Center
NCT04920253
Debritom - Micro Water Jet Technology and Wound Healing
NCT04240574
Efficacy and Safety Study in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT00387101
A Phase 2a Proof of Concept Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MDI-1228-mesylate Gel Compared With Standard of Care Alone in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT06852976
Bioactive Split Thickness Skin Allograft Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT04040426
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The removal of necrotic tissue such as slough, eschar, and underlying biofilm constitutes one of the most important parts of standard of care (SOC). Currently, a variety of techniques are used to debride chronic wounds, such as larval therapy, autolytic and enzymatic methods, monofilament polyester fiber pads or brushes, and mechanical debridement with curettes and scalpels. It has also been demonstrated that more frequent debridement, on average, results in faster wound healing. While regarded as the "gold standard," sharp debridement requires considerable experience of clinicians to ensure that contaminated and devitalized tissue is entirely removed without extensively damaging surrounding healthy tissue. Moreover, a recent research has demonstrated that even when surgical debridement is well-conducted so that it removes the majority of biofilm, within 72 hours, biofilm often re-establishes itself. Given that perhaps 60% of chronic wounds have been found to harbor biofilm, it is challenging to keep such wounds free of biofilm so that the wound-healing process can be sustained. Consequently, any method that could potentially remove more biofilm and/or prevent its recurrence could improve the wound healing trajectory.
Medaxis Debritom+™ cleans and stimulates acute and chronic wounds precisely in a tissue-preserving manner. Its high-pressure micro fluid jet removes slough such as fibrin, necrosis or biofilm, as well as foreign bodies, in effect providing an efficient irrigation and debridement of contaminated wounds. The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess performance of Medaxis Debritom+™ and to collect subject outcome data in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) vs Standard sharp debridement.
There are two arms in the study:
Arm 1: The Experimental Arm , that will include SOC Therapy. SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), use of the Medaxis Debritom+™ micro jet to clean the wound followed by a wound care covering ( Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).
Arm 2: The Standard of Care Arm. The SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), appropriate sharp or surgical debridement, followed by a wound care covering (Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
(Medaxis Debritom+™) micro fluid jet wound therapy
Medaxis Debritom+™ is a high-quality, micro fluid jet therapy device designed to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue, and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanical cleaning and stimulation of the diabetic foot wound
Medaxis Debritom+
Advanced micro fluid jet therapy to clean and stimulate wound
Additional Outer Dressing Application
Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing
Offloading
Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot
Fibracol Wound Dressing
Application of a collagen alginate dressing
Sharp Surgical Debridement
Use of a surgical scalpel or curette to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanically cleaning the wound
Sharp Surgical Debridement
Scalpel or Curette to clean and debride wound
Additional Outer Dressing Application
Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing
Offloading
Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot
Fibracol Wound Dressing
Application of a collagen alginate dressing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medaxis Debritom+
Advanced micro fluid jet therapy to clean and stimulate wound
Sharp Surgical Debridement
Scalpel or Curette to clean and debride wound
Additional Outer Dressing Application
Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing
Offloading
Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot
Fibracol Wound Dressing
Application of a collagen alginate dressing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) meets all of the following features: Wagner Grade 1 or 2 (see Appendix A for definitions), including wounds that extend to the ligament, tendon, joint capsule or fascia
* At least 50% below the medial aspect of the malleolus
* Without abscess or osteomyelitis
* The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more DFUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other ulcerations are present on the same foot, they must be more than 2 cm distant from the index ulcer.
* The index ulcer (i.e. current episode of ulceration) has been present for greater than 4 weeks prior to SV1 and less than 1 year, as of the date the subject consents for study.
* The index ulcer is a minimum of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum of 25 cm2 at SV1 and TV1.
* Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a dorsal transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOM) or a skin perfusion pressure (SPP) measurement of ≥ 30 mmHg, or an Ankle Branchial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed evaluating for biphasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1.
* The index ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization.
* Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, IUD's, barriers or abstinence) during the course of the study and undergo pregnancy tests.
* Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply - with weekly visits.
* Subjects must have read and signed the IRB approved ICF before screening procedures are undertaken.
Exclusion Criteria
* The index ulcer, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer or has a positive carcinoma diagnosis.
* Subjects with a history of more than two weeks of treatment with immune-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids \>10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within 1-month prior to first SV1, or who receive such medications during the screening period or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.
* Subjects taking a selective COX-2 inhibitor, such as Celecoxib, for any condition.
* Subjects on any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding SV1.
* History of radiation at the ulcer site (regardless of time since last radiation treatment).
* Index ulcer has been previously treated or will need to be treated with any prohibited therapies. (See Section 6.2.4 of this protocol for a list of prohibited medications and therapies).
* Subjects with a previous diagnose of HIV, Hepatitis C, or other contagious diseases
* Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study or the subject has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment.
* Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected foot as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization. (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).
* Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Presence of diabetes with poor metabolic control as documented with an HbA1c \> 12.0 within 90 days of randomization.
* Subjects with end stage renal disease as evidenced by a serum creatinine ≥ 3.0 mg/dL within 6 months of randomization.
* Index ulcer has reduced in area by 20% or more after 14 days of SOC from SV1 to the TV1/randomization visit.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Professional Education and Research Institute
OTHER
Medaxis, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Galiano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University School of Medicine
David Armstrong, DPM, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern California; Keck School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CCR Research
San Francisco, California, United States
Doctors Research Network
South Miami, Florida, United States
Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic
Frederick, Maryland, United States
Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Lower Extremity Institute for Research and Therapy, LLC
Youngstown, Ohio, United States
Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic
Salem, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEDX-DT-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.