A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot

NCT ID: NCT04564443

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

222 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-11

Study Completion Date

2024-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess performance of the Medaxis Debritom+™ and to collect subject outcome data in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) vs Standard sharp debridement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The economic burden of DFUs costs the United States over $50 billion each year. The cost to treat one subject with DFUs ranges from $11,700 to $16,883. Although approximately 70% of DFUs are shown to heal with good SOC, at least 30% become chronic wounds. These non-healing wounds are at greater risk for infection and lower extremity amputation. Consequently, good standard of care therapy is important for subjects with chronic DFUs to improve subject outcomes, lower treatment costs and reduce the risk of complications.

The removal of necrotic tissue such as slough, eschar, and underlying biofilm constitutes one of the most important parts of standard of care (SOC). Currently, a variety of techniques are used to debride chronic wounds, such as larval therapy, autolytic and enzymatic methods, monofilament polyester fiber pads or brushes, and mechanical debridement with curettes and scalpels. It has also been demonstrated that more frequent debridement, on average, results in faster wound healing. While regarded as the "gold standard," sharp debridement requires considerable experience of clinicians to ensure that contaminated and devitalized tissue is entirely removed without extensively damaging surrounding healthy tissue. Moreover, a recent research has demonstrated that even when surgical debridement is well-conducted so that it removes the majority of biofilm, within 72 hours, biofilm often re-establishes itself. Given that perhaps 60% of chronic wounds have been found to harbor biofilm, it is challenging to keep such wounds free of biofilm so that the wound-healing process can be sustained. Consequently, any method that could potentially remove more biofilm and/or prevent its recurrence could improve the wound healing trajectory.

Medaxis Debritom+™ cleans and stimulates acute and chronic wounds precisely in a tissue-preserving manner. Its high-pressure micro fluid jet removes slough such as fibrin, necrosis or biofilm, as well as foreign bodies, in effect providing an efficient irrigation and debridement of contaminated wounds. The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess performance of Medaxis Debritom+™ and to collect subject outcome data in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) vs Standard sharp debridement.

There are two arms in the study:

Arm 1: The Experimental Arm , that will include SOC Therapy. SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), use of the Medaxis Debritom+™ micro jet to clean the wound followed by a wound care covering ( Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).

Arm 2: The Standard of Care Arm. The SOC therapy in this study is offloading of the DFU (CAM boots or total contact casting \[TCC\] if the subject's foot is too large for a CAM), appropriate sharp or surgical debridement, followed by a wound care covering (Fibracol dressing or equivalent) along with a moisture retention dressing and a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of 4x4 gauze pads, soft roll and compression wrap (DynaflexTM or equivalent).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Diabetic Foot

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

(Medaxis Debritom+™) micro fluid jet wound therapy

Medaxis Debritom+™ is a high-quality, micro fluid jet therapy device designed to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue, and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanical cleaning and stimulation of the diabetic foot wound

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medaxis Debritom+

Intervention Type OTHER

Advanced micro fluid jet therapy to clean and stimulate wound

Additional Outer Dressing Application

Intervention Type OTHER

Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing

Offloading

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot

Fibracol Wound Dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Application of a collagen alginate dressing

Sharp Surgical Debridement

Use of a surgical scalpel or curette to remove fibrin, necrotic tissue and biofilm from wound surfaces by mechanically cleaning the wound

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sharp Surgical Debridement

Intervention Type OTHER

Scalpel or Curette to clean and debride wound

Additional Outer Dressing Application

Intervention Type OTHER

Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing

Offloading

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot

Fibracol Wound Dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Application of a collagen alginate dressing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medaxis Debritom+

Advanced micro fluid jet therapy to clean and stimulate wound

Intervention Type OTHER

Sharp Surgical Debridement

Scalpel or Curette to clean and debride wound

Intervention Type OTHER

Additional Outer Dressing Application

Application of moisture retentive dressing, and a multi layer compression dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Offloading

Patient will be offloaded in a diabetic camboot after treatment, or total contact cast if patient cannot be fit with diabetic offloading boot

Intervention Type OTHER

Fibracol Wound Dressing

Application of a collagen alginate dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pressure Relief Calcium Alginate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 18 years old.
* Presence of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) meets all of the following features: Wagner Grade 1 or 2 (see Appendix A for definitions), including wounds that extend to the ligament, tendon, joint capsule or fascia
* At least 50% below the medial aspect of the malleolus
* Without abscess or osteomyelitis
* The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more DFUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other ulcerations are present on the same foot, they must be more than 2 cm distant from the index ulcer.
* The index ulcer (i.e. current episode of ulceration) has been present for greater than 4 weeks prior to SV1 and less than 1 year, as of the date the subject consents for study.
* The index ulcer is a minimum of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum of 25 cm2 at SV1 and TV1.
* Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a dorsal transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOM) or a skin perfusion pressure (SPP) measurement of ≥ 30 mmHg, or an Ankle Branchial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed evaluating for biphasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1.
* The index ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization.
* Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, IUD's, barriers or abstinence) during the course of the study and undergo pregnancy tests.
* Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply - with weekly visits.
* Subjects must have read and signed the IRB approved ICF before screening procedures are undertaken.

Exclusion Criteria

* The index ulcer is deemed by the investigator to be caused by a medical condition other than diabetes.
* The index ulcer, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer or has a positive carcinoma diagnosis.
* Subjects with a history of more than two weeks of treatment with immune-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids \>10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within 1-month prior to first SV1, or who receive such medications during the screening period or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.
* Subjects taking a selective COX-2 inhibitor, such as Celecoxib, for any condition.
* Subjects on any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding SV1.
* History of radiation at the ulcer site (regardless of time since last radiation treatment).
* Index ulcer has been previously treated or will need to be treated with any prohibited therapies. (See Section 6.2.4 of this protocol for a list of prohibited medications and therapies).
* Subjects with a previous diagnose of HIV, Hepatitis C, or other contagious diseases
* Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study or the subject has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment.
* Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected foot as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization. (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).
* Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Presence of diabetes with poor metabolic control as documented with an HbA1c \> 12.0 within 90 days of randomization.
* Subjects with end stage renal disease as evidenced by a serum creatinine ≥ 3.0 mg/dL within 6 months of randomization.
* Index ulcer has reduced in area by 20% or more after 14 days of SOC from SV1 to the TV1/randomization visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Professional Education and Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medaxis, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Galiano, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University School of Medicine

David Armstrong, DPM, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California; Keck School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CCR Research

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Doctors Research Network

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lower Extremity Institute for Research and Therapy, LLC

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Foot and Ankle Associates of the Mid-Atlantic

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEDX-DT-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.