Comparative Study of FAST Versus Multidetector CT Scan of the Abdomen in Patients With Abdominal Trauma
NCT ID: NCT04896463
Last Updated: 2021-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-01
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transducer Selection in the Speed and Quality of Image Acquisition in FAST Exams
NCT04333680
Plain Magnetic Resonance (MR) in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Abdomen
NCT01044173
Chest Ultrasound Versus Chest X-ray with Ct As Gold Standard At Trauma Patients
NCT06699277
Impact of Unenhanced Computed Tomography (CT) in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Acute Abdominal Pain
NCT02355483
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) Versus Standard-dose CT
NCT00913380
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In Egypt the mortality from road traffic crashes is about 12000 victims per year, with fatality rate of about 42 deaths per 100 000 population. Majority (48%) of them are passengers of motor vehicles. Car accidents in Egypt rose by 17.8% in 2019 with 9,992 compared to 8,480 in 2018 that is announced by The Central Agency For Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS).
The abdomen is the third most common injured region with surgery required in about 25% of civilian cases.
Abdominal trauma is traditionally classified as either blunt or penetrating (stab or gunshot wounds) which can usually be diagnosed easily and reliably, whereas blunt abdominal trauma is often missed because clinical signs are less obvious.Blunt abdominal injuries predominate in rural areas, while penetrating ones are more frequent in urban settings.
In order to minimize mortality in cases of abdominal trauma, risk factors for mortality needed to be systematically identified and studied. In recent years studies have identified a number of such risk factors, including sex, the length of the interval between abdominal injury and surgery, shock at the time of admission, and cranial injuries.
So appropriate care of the trauma patient entails a multidisciplinary effort that requires speed, efficiency,and proper coordination of the initial care team to make fast rational decisions.In such patient focussed abdominal ultrasonograpghy (FAST) often is the initial imaging examination.
FAST is readily available , low cost, repeatable noninvasive bedside method ,requires minimal preparation time ,and may be performed with mobile equipment that allows greater flexibility in patient positioning than is possible with other imaging modalities .It is also effective in depicting abnormally large intraperitoneal collections of free fluid, which are indirect evidence of a solid organ injury that requires emergency laparotomy.
However, not all clinically important abdominal injuries have associated hemoperitoneum such as those to the bowel , diaphragm, and mesentery. So an initial survey with FAST is often followed by a more thorough examination with multidetector computed tomography (CT) which became the imaging modality of choice in the late 1990s.It is a useful sen e method to detect intraperitoneal free air and intraperitoneal fluid,delineate the extent of solid organ injury,detect retroperitoneal injuries, and help in the decision of conservative nonsurgical therapy.But the adverse effects of it are that it is time consuming procedure and not advisable in hemodynamically unstable patients, moreover it is expensive and carries high risk of radiation exposure when repeated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abdominal ultrasound (US)
abdominal examination with US device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients exposed to different mechanisms of abdominal trauma whether penetrating such as : stab or gunshot wounds . Or a blunt mechanism of trauma such as:motor vehicle collisions ,falls from height ,assaults ,falling down , falling a heavy object on torso , and sports accidents .
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any patient who undergoes urgent surgical intervention as a primary survey.
3. Patient refusal to participate.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zeinab Salah El-Dein Quashty Aly
Emergency medicine resident physician
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAST
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.