Repetition Prescription Approaches Delivered Via Videoconferencing
NCT ID: NCT04895865
Last Updated: 2021-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-23
2021-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary aim of this study is:
Compare between the "predetermined" and the "self-selected" repetition prescription approaches on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes in a cohort of 60 healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) over an eight-week period of live, videoconferencing RT sessions.
The secondary aim is:
Determine the influence of live, videoconferencing group RT sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes across groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Understanding Motivation Towards Exercise to Enhance Physical Activity on Prescription Adherence
NCT06658704
Resistance Training to Improve Physical Function in the Elderly
NCT01385475
Relationship Between Aerobic Prescription Methods
NCT02660450
Effect of Acute Exercise on Cognitive Functions
NCT01241851
Comparison of Exercise Intensity Prescription
NCT02351713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Providing trainees with more choices in exercise sessions is an autonomy supportive process which can lead to a more enjoyable experience, greater adherence to the training program and preferable performance outcomes. We will compare between two approaches to prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training sessions- the "predetermined" and the "self-selected", based on the amount of choice trainees receive while training. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will train bi-weekly for 45 minutes using resistance bands in a live, videoconferencing group setting.
Intervention details:
The intervention will last eight weeks and include bi-weekly, 45-minute online sessions instructed by two alternating experienced instructors. Each session will include an introduction and setup (5-minutes), warm-up (5-minutes), body-weight and resistance band exercises (30-minutes) and cool down (5-minutes). We will upload the study protocol to an external server for more details.
Both groups will follow the exact same exercise program with one key difference: participants in the "predetermined" group will be instructed to complete 10 repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal. Conversely, in the "self-selected" group, participants will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the same target RPE of 7/10. Note that while the initial resistance, and thus, the number of repetitions is expected to differ between group, both are matched for perception of effort.
Recruitment and procedures:
Participants will be recruited via social media (i.e., Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA). Each candidate will be screened for initial eligibility. After screening participants will be block-randomized to the "predetermined" of the "self-selected" groups, matched for age and gender. Participants will be blind to their allocation (see concealment section). Prior to visiting the exercise laboratory at Tel Aviv University for the testing session, participants will receive written materials regarding the exercise sessions, testing procedures, and the use of the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (0-10), and a video demonstrating the implementation of RPE in practice. All participants that are part of a given group will be required to complete the first testing session within a maximum of one week before the program begins, and the follow up testing session within a maximum of one week after the program ends. Practically, one group will begin and end all procedures (i.e., initial testing, eight-weeks program, follow up testing) one week before the other group. The order of which group will begin first will be randomly decided by a coin flip.
The initial testing session will include the following steps:
1. Sign an informed consent form.
2. Fill out the Basic Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ).
3. Body composition analysis (see outcome measures section).
4. RPE terminology verification based on the videos and written materials delivered in advance.
5. Performance tests (see outcome measures section).
6. Practice how to use the resistance band (see below) and set up terminology to be used during the sessions (e.g. "open loop", "more tension").
That same order will be kept on the final tests (excluding the informed consent), which will also be conducted at the same place, at the same hour-window, and by the same experimenter.
Home-based equipment:
Participants will receive one elastic band (NT loops, purchased from: (https://www.ntloop.com/shop/) as they are affordable, accessible and allow exercising in a controlled, safe manner. When practicing with an elastic band, changing grip width, or rubber stiffness allows the trainee to achieve greater or lesser resistance.
Videoconferencing platform:
RT sessions will be delivered using "Zoom video communications" (San-Jose, CA, USA) due to its popularity and user-friendly interface. Additionally, a WhatsApp group chat (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) will be created for each group to deliver updates and reminders. A technical assistant from the research team will be available during the live broadcast.
Sample size:
This sample size is based on our recruitment abilities and resources and based on our previous experience with this type of intervention. A sample size of 30 participants per group is considered large in exercise science research with both statistically and practically significant effects often detected. We also expect for future meta-analyses to take place and for this work to be included. Thus, even if this study is currently under-powered for small effects, it may add valuable data to the field of exercise science.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-selected
Participants in the "self-selected" arm will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the target rating of perceived exertion RPE of 7/10
RPE-based load and repetition number selection
Providing trainees with choices regarding the load and the number of repetitions to be performed per set and exercise
Predetermined
Participants in the "predetermined" arm will be instructed to complete ten repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal.
Predetermined load and number of repetitions
Trainees predetermine the load and perform ten repetitions per set and exercise
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RPE-based load and repetition number selection
Providing trainees with choices regarding the load and the number of repetitions to be performed per set and exercise
Predetermined load and number of repetitions
Trainees predetermine the load and perform ten repetitions per set and exercise
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-active (characterized by 60 minutes or less per week of formal exercise sessions)
* Ages of 18-45
* Did not participate in RT in the past six months.
* Participants will be asked to fill out a health questionnaire. If they marked any of the items on the health questionnaire as positive (e.g., diabetes) they were asked to provide a medical clearance from a doctor.
* Signing a health declaration to participate in physical activity according to the government regulations
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of co-morbidities
* Routine use of prescription medication
* Pregnancy
* Less than six months after childbirth
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Israel Science Foundation
OTHER
Tel Aviv University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Israel Halperin
Senior faculty member
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Israel Halperin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tel Aviv University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schwartz H, Har-Nir I, Wenhoda T, Halperin I. Staying physically active during the COVID-19 quarantine: exploring the feasibility of live, online, group training sessions among older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):314-322. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa141.
Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):270-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
Lopes JSS, Machado AF, Micheletti JK, de Almeida AC, Cavina AP, Pastre CM. Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Feb 19;7:2050312119831116. doi: 10.1177/2050312119831116. eCollection 2019.
Emanuel A, Har-Nir I, Rozen Smukas II, Halperin I. The effect of self-selecting the number of repetitions on motor performance and psychological outcomes. Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2398-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01402-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Resistance bands used in the intervention
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IHalperin
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.