Hand MOtor Rehabilitation Using a EMG-biofeedback: a Cross-sectional Study
NCT ID: NCT04889586
Last Updated: 2021-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-25
2019-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Hand MOtor Rehabilitation Using a sEMG-biofeedback
NCT05416619
Study on the Effects of an EMG-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator for Upper Limb for Post-stroke Patients
NCT06928857
EMG Controlled Device in Acute Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke
NCT04599036
BCI Post-stroke Neurorehabilitation
NCT02404857
Rehabilitation of Arm Function Using a Biofeedback Method After Stroke
NCT04777253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The device REMO consists in an armband composed by 8 bipolar electrodes able to record and process the electromyography of forearm muscles. The patterns of muscle activations are classified and used to perform EMG-biofeedback exercises in stroke rehabilitation training. The device is developed by clinicians of IRCCS San Camillo Hospital and spin-off Morecognition Srl.
A total of 100 stroke patients patients has been recruited. They are clinically assessed and then tested on the ability to control the sEMG wearable device. The test is composed of 10 hand and fingers gestures to be performed with the paretic hand. Baseline and activation sEMG signals are recorded and compared for each movement. Three conditions representing absent, partial or full control of the device are defined and logistic multivarialbes regression models are used to identify clinical features describing the group each patient belongs to. Clinical cut-off for each strata is identified by odds ratio.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
The subjects were clinically assessed with a define clinical protocol. After that, the subjects executed the device test with EMG-biofeedback wearable armband.
EMG-biofeedback armband (REMO)
After clinical evaluation, the subjects execute an instrumental test. By wearing EMG-biofeedback device (REMO), the subjects have to perform 10 different hand gestures: thumb abduction, pinch, finger flexion, finger extension, wrist flexion, wrist extension, forearm pronation, forearm supination, radial wrist deviation and ulnar wrist deviation. The muscle activations (EMG signals) during the execution of each movements, are recorded for 3 seconds.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMG-biofeedback armband (REMO)
After clinical evaluation, the subjects execute an instrumental test. By wearing EMG-biofeedback device (REMO), the subjects have to perform 10 different hand gestures: thumb abduction, pinch, finger flexion, finger extension, wrist flexion, wrist extension, forearm pronation, forearm supination, radial wrist deviation and ulnar wrist deviation. The muscle activations (EMG signals) during the execution of each movements, are recorded for 3 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Score lower than 100 out of a total of 126 at the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale
Exclusion Criteria
* Major depressive disorder;
* Fractures;
* Traumatic Brain Injurj;
* Severe Ideomotor Apraxia;
* Severe Neglect;
* Severe impairment of verbal comprehension.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andrea Turolla
Laboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrea Turolla, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital
Venice-Lido, Venice, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Celadon N, Dosen S, Binder I, Ariano P, Farina D. Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Aug 4;13(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0172-3.
Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Hogan N. Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Sep;13(3):325-34. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.850423.
Paleari M, Di Girolamo M, Celadon N, Favetto A, Ariano P. On optimal electrode configuration to estimate hand movements from forearm surface electromyography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:6086-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319780.
Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 12;2014(11):CD010820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016.29
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.