Treatment of Chronic Stroke With AMES + EMG Biofeedback

NCT ID: NCT01116544

Last Updated: 2019-11-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-21

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if individuals who had a stroke more than one year before entering the study and who remain unable to open their affected hand are better able to sense and move their affected arm after 10-15 weeks of treatment with a new robotic therapy device (the AMES device) and EMG biofeedback.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over the last 20 years, the discovery of cortical plasticity in the adult human brain has led to the development of new therapies to rehabilitate stroke survivors whose recovery of motor function has stalled with conventional therapeutic methodology. However, the efficacy of these new therapies appears to be limited to relatively high-functioning chronic stroke patients. A therapeutic approach that may be efficacious in restoring functional movement to low-functioning chronic stroke patients is "AMES," which stands for Assisted Movement with Enhanced Sensation. Despite the efficacy of AMES in restoring movement to low-functioning hemiparetic stroke patients, those with plegia at a joint tend not to recover movement in the plegic direction with AMES treatment or with other rehabilitation therapies. The objective of this study is to determine if AMES treatment in combination with biofeedback can be helpful in restoring functional movement to plegic stroke patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Plegia Paresis Cerebrovascular Accident

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback

The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of EMG activity the subject is able to generate in the hand. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with EMG biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AMES Therapy (assisted movement and enhanced sensation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each subject will receive 30 sessions of AMES therapy in the clinic. Each session will consist of 10 min of functional testing (i.e., passive motion and strength tests) followed by 30 min of grasp therapy using the AMES device. One group of subjects will receive AMES therapy only with joint torque biofeedback (without EMG feedback), and the other group will receive AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback. While all test subjects should attempt to open the hand when the grasp mechanism is opening and close the hand when the mechanism is closing, the biofeedback information provided to aid a subject will differ for the 2 subject groups.

AMES therapy with Torque biofeedback

The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of torque (force) the subject is able to generate in the hand during the movement. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with Torque biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AMES Therapy (assisted movement and enhanced sensation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each subject will receive 30 sessions of AMES therapy in the clinic. Each session will consist of 10 min of functional testing (i.e., passive motion and strength tests) followed by 30 min of grasp therapy using the AMES device. One group of subjects will receive AMES therapy only with joint torque biofeedback (without EMG feedback), and the other group will receive AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback. While all test subjects should attempt to open the hand when the grasp mechanism is opening and close the hand when the mechanism is closing, the biofeedback information provided to aid a subject will differ for the 2 subject groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AMES Therapy (assisted movement and enhanced sensation)

Each subject will receive 30 sessions of AMES therapy in the clinic. Each session will consist of 10 min of functional testing (i.e., passive motion and strength tests) followed by 30 min of grasp therapy using the AMES device. One group of subjects will receive AMES therapy only with joint torque biofeedback (without EMG feedback), and the other group will receive AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback. While all test subjects should attempt to open the hand when the grasp mechanism is opening and close the hand when the mechanism is closing, the biofeedback information provided to aid a subject will differ for the 2 subject groups.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Robotic

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hemispheric stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), cortical or sub-cortical, documented by either a CT or MRI scan and associated with residual upper extremity weakness.
* Chronic stroke, occurring ≥12 months prior to subject enrollment.
* Age 18-80 years old.
* Inability to move any of the fingers of the affected hand more than 5.0 cm into extension.
* Finger-and-wrist impedance ≤3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale.
* Measureable EMG (\>2 x baseline) in the long finger extensor muscle during attempted hand opening or closing.
* Physically and cognitively capable of consenting to and complying with the protocol (based on exam by Study Physician).
* Subject must be physically capable of communicating informed consent or must be accompanied by legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Complete flaccidity of the affected arm.
* Significant upper extremity proprioceptive deficit (\<70% correct detection of the direction of passive finger movement with eyes closed).
* Pathological neurological/physical conditions, other than stroke, impairing the function of the impaired arm or resulting in pain in the arm.
* Spinal cord injury, arthritis, or fractures of affected arm that have resulted in loss of range of motion.
* Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy resulting in significant motor or sensory loss in the tested arm.
* Cardiopulmonary compromise including but not limited to uncontrolled hypertension or angina, deep vein thrombosis, decompensated congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, heart irregularities, or exercise intolerance.
* Major active psychiatric disorder.
* Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions including severe apraxia; inability to understand verbal (English) directions, or inability to communicate adequately with study personnel.
* Size of arm incompatible with the AMES device (checked by placing the limb in the device).
* Severe contractures or decreased range of motion or skin condition that would prohibit comfortable positioning or tolerance of the device or the vibrators.
* Any progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting the upper extremity motor system.
* Uncontrolled seizure disorder.
* Current abuse of alcohol or drugs.
* Terminal illness with anticipated survival of \<12 months.
* Current or planned concurrent participation in another study involving therapy to the impaired arm
* Planned initiation of or cessation of any kind of clinical therapy to the impaired limb just prior to or during the AMES treatment period.
* NIH Stroke Scale, following scores: Sensory Item score of \>1; Neglect involving the affected limb score \>1.
* Intent to receive Botox injections (5 months prior to or during enrollment), initiation of antispasmodic medication, or use of any other robotic (e.g., MANUS, Locomat) or electrical or vibratory stimulation device (e.g., Bioness) while participating in the AMES trial.
* Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

AMES Technology

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul J. Cordo, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University School of Medicine

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cordo P, Wolf S, Lou JS, Bogey R, Stevenson M, Hayes J, Roth E. Treatment of severe hand impairment following stroke by combining assisted movement, muscle vibration, and biofeedback. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;37(4):194-203. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24232364 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT NS060192

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Rehabilitation Study for Stroke Patients
NCT03148106 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Rehabilitation of the Stroke Hand at Home
NCT01144715 COMPLETED PHASE4