Topical Lidocaine Anesthesia for Nasopharyngeal Sampling

NCT ID: NCT04885777

Last Updated: 2021-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: Nasopharyngeal sampling is widely used in the diagnosis of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of topical lidocaine application for nasopharyngeal sampling, on pain perception, the comfort of the patients, and the application difficulty for healthcare staff.

Methods: This study is a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study conducted with 100 healthy volunteers (50 participants in Lidocaine group and 50 participants in Placebo group). Two ml of a solution containing 10 mg/ml of lidocaine was applied to each nostril of the participants in the Lidocaine group, and the same dose of 0.9% NaCl to the Placebo group. Investigators performed two repeated sampling one hour apart. The first sampling was performed before intervention, and the second was performed five-minutes after intervention. Investigators compared the changes in pain intensity and discomfort intensity using two numerical rating scales, the frequency of undesirable reactions, and the judgment of the practitioner staff about the sampling procedure between first and second sampling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study with restricted randomization of an allocation ratio of 1:1. We used Random Allocation Software (RAS) for randomization. The study is conducted following the CONSORT guideline and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki we obtained the approval of the Ataturk University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Also, the written informed consent of all participants will obtained.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nasopharyngeal Sampling Local Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine group

One ml of a solution containing 20 mg/ml of lidocaine was applied to each nostril of the participants in the Lidocaine group. Thus, a total of 40 mg of lidocaine, 20 mg for each nostril, was given to the individuals of the Lidocaine group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Initially, a nasopharyngeal swab was performed on each group without any intervention. Investigators waited at least one hour for the second sample collection. If the participant was still in pain or felt discomfort due to the first sampling, the waiting time has been extended.

At the second stage, one ml of a solution containing 20 mg/ml of lidocaine, was applied to each nostril of the participants in the Lidocaine group. Thus, a total of 40 mg of lidocaine, 20 mg for each nostril, was given to the individuals of the Lidocaine group. The second samples were collected after waiting 5 minutes following the administration of the solution.

Placebo group

The Placebo group received only a total of 2 ml of 0.9% NaCl (one ml for each nostril).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Initially, a nasopharyngeal swab was performed on placebo group without any intervention. Investigators waited at least one hour for the second sample collection. If the participant was still in pain or felt discomfort due to the first sampling, the waiting time has been extended.

At the second stage, the Placebo group received only a total of 2 ml of 0.9% NaCl (one ml for each nostril). The second samples were collected after waiting 5 minutes following the administration of the solution.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine

Initially, a nasopharyngeal swab was performed on each group without any intervention. Investigators waited at least one hour for the second sample collection. If the participant was still in pain or felt discomfort due to the first sampling, the waiting time has been extended.

At the second stage, one ml of a solution containing 20 mg/ml of lidocaine, was applied to each nostril of the participants in the Lidocaine group. Thus, a total of 40 mg of lidocaine, 20 mg for each nostril, was given to the individuals of the Lidocaine group. The second samples were collected after waiting 5 minutes following the administration of the solution.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Initially, a nasopharyngeal swab was performed on placebo group without any intervention. Investigators waited at least one hour for the second sample collection. If the participant was still in pain or felt discomfort due to the first sampling, the waiting time has been extended.

At the second stage, the Placebo group received only a total of 2 ml of 0.9% NaCl (one ml for each nostril). The second samples were collected after waiting 5 minutes following the administration of the solution.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

nasopharyngeal sampling

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-


* being 18 years and older
* volunteering to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* taking analgesic drugs before admission,
* pregnancy,
* lactation,
* having a bleeding disorder, \*known allergy to Lidocaine, \* previous nasal trauma or operation,
* having respiratory tract infection symptoms (such as fever, headache, runny nose, sore throat, cough, sneeze, breathlessness),
* having a chronic disease (diabetes, cancer, heart disease, asthma, COPD, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ataturk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdullah Osman KOCAK

Associate Professor of Emergency Department of Ataturk University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ataturk University

Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carpenter CR, Mudd PA, West CP, Wilber E, Wilber ST. Diagnosing COVID-19 in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review of Clinical Examinations, Laboratory Tests, Imaging Accuracy, and Biases. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;27(8):653-670. doi: 10.1111/acem.14048. Epub 2020 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32542934 (View on PubMed)

Tolia VM, Chan TC, Castillo EM. Preliminary Results of Initial Testing for Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 27;21(3):503-506. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.47348.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32223871 (View on PubMed)

Petruzzi G, De Virgilio A, Pichi B, Mazzola F, Zocchi J, Mercante G, Spriano G, Pellini R. COVID-19: Nasal and oropharyngeal swab. Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1303-1304. doi: 10.1002/hed.26212. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32352180 (View on PubMed)

Tsujimoto Y, Terada J, Kimura M, Moriya A, Motohashi A, Izumi S, Kawajiri K, Hakkaku K, Morishita M, Saito S, Takumida H, Watanabe H, Tsukada A, Morita C, Yamaguchi Y, Katsuno T, Kusaba Y, Sakamoto K, Hashimoto M, Suzuki M, Takasaki J, Hojo M, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Sugiyama H. Diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal swab, nasal swab and saliva swab samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR. Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Aug;53(8):581-589. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1903550. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33760699 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ataturk University0000

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.