The Effect of Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine During Insertion and Removal of Nasal Packing

NCT ID: NCT04519463

Last Updated: 2020-08-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-30

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to investigate the effect of local nasal anesthesia with lidocaine spray on the insertion of nasal tampons during active nasal bleeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nasal packing has many uses, such as prevention of postoperative bleeding following endoscopic sinus surgery, stabilization of the nasal septum, prevention of adhesions following septoplasty, and treatment of active epistaxis1,2.

The utilization of tampons for nasal packing during nasal and sinus surgeries is widely used and safe. Nasal tampons assist in creating a moist supportive environment for tissue healing without causing local irritation or foreign body reaction3. The removal is performed after 24-48 hours. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to the uses of nasal tampons: trauma to the nasal mucosa, infection of the nose and sinuses, aspiration of part of the tampon, and even toxic shock syndrome3. One of the most troublesome aspects to the patient and the clinician is the pain and discomfort during insertion and removal of the tampons3,4. In our experience, these symptoms are of considerable significance to the patient experience and satisfaction.

There is a wide range of commercially available nasal packings such as Merocel and Nasopore.

In our practice, Merocel nasal tampons are used, which contain polyvinyl acetate. This type of material expands upon contact with fluids, and it is not soluble. This product is used at the end of endoscopic nasal surgeries and in the treatment of active epistaxis, not amenable to local pressure and without a recognizable source of bleeding. In case of unstoppable bleeding despite the use of nasal tampons, a nasal balloon is inflated in the nasal cavity. Its insertion and inflation are associated with patient pain and discomfort.

Lidocaine is a drug commonly used for local anesthesia. It is used for local nasal anesthesia by a variety of commercially available sprays, atomizers, nebulizers, gels, and ointments. Lidocaine causes local anesthesia by affecting sodium channels, causing decreased initiation and conduction of neural impulses. In turn, fewer afferent impulses reach the central nervous system6. In healthy individuals, side effects are negligible, but it could influence patients with cardiac infarction. The main side effects of lidocaine are neurological, which could be of significance in the case of inflamed or damaged tissue because of rapid absorption. The use of Lidocaine spray (Xylocaine 10%) is commonly available worldwide and is routinely used in our institution before fiberoptic laryngoscopy.

Previous publications have mentioned the positive effect of local anesthesia during the removal of nasal tampons5,7. In a recent meta-analysis, local anesthetics were associated with less pain during the removal of nasal tampons and shortened time of the procedure. Yet, the authors recognized the need for additional randomized controlled trials7. There are no previous publications on the effect of local anesthetics on the insertions of nasal tampons during active nasal bleeding. In the experience of the senior author, for many years, the application of lidocaine spray 10% before the insertions of nasal tampons for epistaxis was associated with a significant reduction of pain and discomfort.

This study aims to investigate the effect of local nasal anesthesia with lidocaine spray on the insertion of nasal tampons during active nasal bleeding. Secondary objectives include the impact on nasal tampons removal after the cessation of nasal bleeding and after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Research hypothesis: local anesthesia with lidocaine before the insertion of nasal tampons or inflatable balloon reduces patients' pain, discomfort, and stress during insertion for the treatment of active nasal bleeding, and during removal of nasal tampons either postoperatively or after cessation of epistaxis.

The study population involves 30 patients with spontaneous epistaxis and another 30 patients who went tampon removal postoperatively in our institution. Recruitment includes patients who came to the emergency department with active epistaxis and still had active bleeding after the application of local pressure without an identified source of bleeding, requiring treatment with tampons or an inflatable balloon. The second group included patients who require postoperative removal of nasal tampons.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epistaxis Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Both Xylocaine spray and Placebo (saline) will be in similar containers with serial numbers, Both clinician and patient are blinded to the content.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Xylocaine

30 patients who receive Xylocaine 10% nasal spray

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Xylocaine Mucosal Product

Intervention Type DRUG

Xylocaine 10% Nasal Spray

Saline

30 patients who receive saline nasal spray

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Chloride 0.9%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Xylocaine Mucosal Product

Xylocaine 10% Nasal Spray

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Sodium Chloride 0.9%

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age of 18 years or older
* Both sexes
* No known allergy for local anesthetics agents
* Patients with active nasal bleeding requiring the insertion of a tampon or an inflatable balloon, or patients requiring tampon removal postoperatively.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 18 years.
* Known allergy to local anesthetics
* Lack of willingness to participate in a clinical trial
* Patient unable to give informed consent from any reason
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Muhamed Masalha

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhamed Masalha

Dr, Muhamed Masalha; Principal Investigator; Senior Surgeon in the Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Unit, the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and neck surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Muhamed Masalha, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emek Medical Center

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Muhamed Masalha, MD

Role: CONTACT

+972-54-635-5305

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Muhamed Masalha, MD

Role: primary

+972-54-635-5305

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Watson MG, Campbell JB, Shenoi PM. Nasal surgery: does the type of nasal pack influence the results? Rhinology. 1989 Jun;27(2):105-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2781213 (View on PubMed)

Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH. Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2001 Sep-Oct;22(5):306-20. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2001.26499.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11562881 (View on PubMed)

Haytoglu S, Kuran G, Muluk NB, Arikan OK. Different anesthetic agents-soaked sinus packings on pain management after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: which is the most effective? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;273(7):1769-77. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3807-2. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26511988 (View on PubMed)

Karaaslan K, Yilmaz F, Gulcu N, Yigit B, Kocoglu H. The effect of prilocaine and prilocaine plus meperidine infiltration on the pain during nasal packing removal. Rhinology. 2007 Dec;45(4):321-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18085028 (View on PubMed)

Tsai SC, Lai MT, Kao YL, Wu CC. Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May-Jun;86(3):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32127341 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0081-20-EMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.