Distraction Technique to Reduce Discomfort of Transnasal Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03191370

Last Updated: 2023-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-08

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the effectiveness of reducing discomfort during flexible nasal endoscopy using simple distraction techniques compared to topical anaesthetic spray and a control group that does not receive topical anaesthetic spray or a distraction technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this randomised controlled study patients will be randomly allocated into one of four groups; the first group will receive topical (co-phenylcaine) anaesthetic spray without distraction, the second group will receive topical (co-phenylcaine) anaesthetic spray with distraction, the thirds group will receive no topical (co-phenylcaine) anaesthetic spray without distraction and the fourth group will receive no topical (co-phenylcaine) anaesthetic spray with distraction. The distraction technique that will be employed is counting backwards from 30 to 1 in even numbers only. All flexible nasal endoscopies will be performed by either of the two most senior clinicians involved in the study. The procedure will be carried out in standard outpatient clinic room setting. Post procedural discomfort assessments will be undertaken using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Power calculations shows that \>24 patients would result in an adequately powered study (\>80%). Data analysis will be undertaken by SPSS and independent T-tests will be performed to assess for statistical significance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local Anaesthetic, no distraction

Will receive local (co-phenylcaine) anesthetic spray (Local Anesthetics,Topical) as an active comparator without distraction during the procedure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anesthetics,Topical

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthetic spray

Local Anaesthetic, with distraction

Will receive local (co-phenylcaine) anesthetic spray (Local Anesthetics,Topical) with distraction during the procedure. The simple distraction technique is the experimental intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simple distraction technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Asking the patient to count backwards from 30 to1 in even numbers whilst the procedure is being performed.

Local Anesthetics,Topical

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthetic spray

No Local Anaesthetic without distraction

Will receive no local (co-phenylcaine) anaesthetic spray without distraction during the procedure.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

No Local Anaesthetic, with distraction

Will receive no local (co-phenylcaine) anesthetic spray with distraction during the procedure. The simple distraction technique is the experimental intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simple distraction technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Asking the patient to count backwards from 30 to1 in even numbers whilst the procedure is being performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simple distraction technique

Asking the patient to count backwards from 30 to1 in even numbers whilst the procedure is being performed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Local Anesthetics,Topical

Anesthetic spray

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Co-phenylcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and Female participants aged 18+
* Patient requires flexible fiberoptic transnasal laryngoscopy.
* Patient has no preferences in relation to which arm of the study they would like to be in.

Exclusion Criteria

* Flexible nasal endoscopy not indicated
* Local anaesthetic required for other reasons - e.g. vasoconstrictor effects
* Patient has a clear preference to which group they are randomised to
* Significant sino-nasal disease
* Patient under the age of 18
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Faisal A Arshad, MRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

United Lincolnshire NHS trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust

Lincoln, Research Manager, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conlin AE, McLean L. Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of local anesthetic, vasoconstrictive, and lubricating agents in flexible fibre-optic nasolaryngoscopy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;37(2):240-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19128620 (View on PubMed)

Cain AJ, Murray DP, McClymont LG. The use of topical nasal anaesthesia before flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing cophenylcaine with placebo. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Dec;27(6):485-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00608.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12472516 (View on PubMed)

Choudhury N, Amer I, Daniels M, Wareing MJ. Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during aural microsuction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Jan;95(1):34-6. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609955535.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23317724 (View on PubMed)

Pothier DD, Raghava N, Monteiro P, Awad Z. A randomized controlled trial: is water better than a standard lubricant in nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):134-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01173.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16620333 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

280217ArshadFaisal

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.