Comparison of Topical and Nebulized Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Esophago-Gastro-Duodenoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02317770

Last Updated: 2016-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the effect of nebulized lidocaine and lidocaine spray in patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. The investigators evaluate the success rate of the procedure between two methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized-controlled trial in the patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. The patients are randomized by computer into two arms: nebulized lidocaine and lidocaine spray. Both drugs are applied 15-20 minutes prior the prior the procedure. Only one endoscopist participate in this study. After the procedure finishes, the investigators evaluate the outcome and satisfaction of patients and endoscopist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia of Mucous Membrane

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine Spray

20 puffs of 10% Lidocaine spray

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine Spray

Intervention Type DRUG

5 puffs of 10% Lidocaine spray is administered every 5 minutes for 4 times. Then the patient is undergone procedure 5 minutes later.

Nebulized Lidocaine

2.5 mL of 10% Lidocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nebulized Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient receives 2.5 mL of 10% lidocaine is used by nebulizer under oxygen flow 6-7 LPM for 15 minutes prior the procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine Spray

5 puffs of 10% Lidocaine spray is administered every 5 minutes for 4 times. Then the patient is undergone procedure 5 minutes later.

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulized Lidocaine

The patient receives 2.5 mL of 10% lidocaine is used by nebulizer under oxygen flow 6-7 LPM for 15 minutes prior the procedure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xylocaine Spray Nebulized Xylocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* elective case for esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy with ASA classification 1-2
* Both genders
* Age between 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria

* History of smoking
* Upper respiratory tract infection
* Asthma
* Heart disease
* Allergy to local anesthetic drugs

Withdrawal or termination criteria

* Patient refusal
* Patient develops lidocaine allergy
* Bronchospasm
* Sign of Local Anesthetic Toxicity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Papiroon Noitasaeng, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Papiroon Noitasaeng, RN

Role: CONTACT

66(81)4930935

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Papiroon Noitasaeng, RN

Role: primary

66(81)4930935

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Korttila K, Tarkkanen J, Tarkkanen L. Comparison of laryngotracheal and ultrasonic nebulizer administration of lidocaine in local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Apr;25(2):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01628.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7324824 (View on PubMed)

Dhir V, Swaroop VS, Vazifdar KF, Wagle SD. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia without intravenous sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;16(1):10-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9167371 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SI534/2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.