Impact of Simulation Based Learning on Gender, and Equity Dynamics Among Inter-health Professional Teams

NCT ID: NCT04874987

Last Updated: 2021-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

At Mbarara University of Science and Technology and partner sites, the investigators will explore the role of simulation in gender and equity. African societies are largely patriarchal, and this spills over into professional practice and medical education. Simulation methodology is at risk of suffering from a patriarchal dominance. The male dominance has potential to introduce power relationships between men and women learners in a scenario setting and between physicians and nurses. In the presence of such power differentials, the less dominant party could develop a "culture of silence," fail to take decisions on issues that affect them or their patients, fail to talk about these issues and take appropriate action.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To address the challenges of gender and equity: 1) the investigators will teach Advocacy Inquiry (AI) and the ladder of inference (LoI) as conversational strategies for all simulation faculty members to explore participant frames of action and thought processes, 2) the investigators will design and expose participants to simulated scenarios with embedded gender and or inter-professional power differentials, 3) study the effect of AI, the LoI and debriefed gender and equity scenarios on participant engagement strategies during gender and inter-professional conflict situations.

The Ladder of Influence allows facilitators select some data / observation, add interpretation, draw conclusions and take action. Though the Ladder of influence is a powerful approach to exploring situations, its prone to challenges if users jump to conclusions quickly without being curious about what alternative interpretations of the observed data / action could be. AI uses the "show", "think" and "wonder" as a strategy to slow facilitators from jumping up the LoI to draw conclusions before exploring learner perspectives. AI and the LoI in combination encourage self-reflection and good judgment. The investigators will deliberately encourage simulation teams to have both males and females and inter-professional with opportunities for team leaders to vary with both sex and profession.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Simulation-based Methodology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simulation based learning with Advocacy inquiry and ladder of influence

Simulation scenarios based on identified gender and equity gaps. We will explore experiences of male and female participants, and inter-professional simulation participants (e.g nurses and doctors, medical and nursing students) post intervention exposure on their role and experiences in simulated sessions and clinical care experiences

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Gender sensitive simulation based learning

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medical students
* Faculty members in the Faculty of Medicine
* Based at Mbarara University, Lira University, Busitema University, or Muni University

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical students and faculty outside the participating Universities
* Non-medical students
* Faculty not based in the Faculties of Medicine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The ELMA Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Mbarara, , Uganda

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Data Santorino, MD

Role: CONTACT

0774500571

Francis Bajunirwe, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0772 576 396

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Santorino Data, MBChB, MMed

Role: primary

256712214458

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020/MUST-3/SIM-II

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Problem-Solving Training
NCT05688319 COMPLETED NA