NAVA vs. CMV Crossover in Severe BPD

NCT ID: NCT04821453

Last Updated: 2025-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-13

Study Completion Date

2025-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective, unblinded, pilot randomized cross-over trial of 2 modes of mechanical ventilation will compare measures of pulmonary mechanics, respiratory gas exchange, and patient comfort between conventional flow triggered mechanical ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) among 20 prematurely born infants and young children receiving invasive respiratory support for severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Most research to date in neonatal lung disease has focused on bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) prevention. As a result, insufficient investigation has been performed to define optimal respiratory management strategies for infants and young children with established BPD. Thus, there is no robust evidence base to guide ventilator management to promote lung disease recovery and support neurodevelopment in this population. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is an alternative to conventional flow triggered ventilation that has shown promise for improving respiratory gas exchange, patient-ventilator interaction, and work of breathing in preterm neonates. The safety and efficacy of NAVA in infants and young children with established, severe BPD is uncertain. This prospective, unblinded, pilot randomized cross-over trial of 2 modes of mechanical ventilation will compare measures of pulmonary mechanics, respiratory gas exchange, and patient comfort between conventional flow triggered mechanical ventilation and NAVA among 20 prematurely born infants and young children receiving invasive respiratory support for severe BPD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Prospective, unblinded, pilot randomized cross-over trial of 2 modes of mechanical ventilation
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Flow Triggered Mechanical Ventilation (CMV)

Subjects will be ventilated with conventional mechanical ventilation with data collected for the 5 day time frame to compare to the experimental arm

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

CMV

Intervention Type DEVICE

CMV mode of mechanical ventilation that provides a trigger for a spontaneous breath from the airway flow sensor with dynamics of the breath set as required by the mode

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

Subjects will be ventilated on neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) mode with data collected for the 5 day time frame to compare with placebo arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NAVA

Intervention Type DEVICE

NAVA mode of mechanical ventilation provide the trigger for a spontaneous breath from the diaphragmatic movement instead of diaphragm and allows the patient to control the dynamics of the breath generally set in CMV mode.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NAVA

NAVA mode of mechanical ventilation provide the trigger for a spontaneous breath from the diaphragmatic movement instead of diaphragm and allows the patient to control the dynamics of the breath generally set in CMV mode.

Intervention Type DEVICE

CMV

CMV mode of mechanical ventilation that provides a trigger for a spontaneous breath from the airway flow sensor with dynamics of the breath set as required by the mode

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Conventional Flow Triggered Mechanical Ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Gestational ages (GA) ≤ 32 weeks
2. Current age between 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and 2 years corrected age
3. Severe BPD \[as per National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus definition\] diagnosed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age
4. Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ongoing lung disease
5. Not expected to be ready for extubation within 11 days following enrollment
6. Parental consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe congenital anomalies
2. Known diaphragmatic defect
3. Current treatment with high frequency mechanical ventilation
4. Do not resuscitate (DNR) Status or Futility of Care
5. \>10% leak around the artificial airway,
6. Treatment with neuromuscular blockade within 72 hours prior to enrollment
7. Acute respiratory instability defined as a ventilator rate increase \> 15 beats per minute (bpm), Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increase \> 2 cm/water (H2O), sustained FiO2 increase \> 20%, and/or prescribed increase in tidal volume \> 2 mL/kg within 24 hours prior to enrollment will be excluded.
Maximum Eligible Age

24 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rhode Island Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Miracle Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

American Respiratory Care Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik Jensen, MD, MSCE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital (Hasboro Children's Hospital)

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-017175

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.