Endoluminal Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT04801719
Last Updated: 2021-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-04
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
NCT01721174
Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction Due to Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT05546372
Efficacy of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination With Metallic Biliary Stenting in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT04611100
Endoscopic Biliary RFA of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT02582541
Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stents (FCMS) in Benign Biliary Strictures
NCT02105181
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients underwent percutaneous cholangiography followed by transhepatic drainage, all patients underwent histopathologic verification of the stenosis.
Randomised patients in selected arm received endoluminal RFA by 8F catheter (Habib™ EndoHPB; EMcision Ltd., London, UK) before stenting procedure. Repeated ablations were processed through stenotic areas (10W, 90-120s, Rita 1500, Angiodynamics Ltd), all drained biliary tracts were used for introducing catheter and performance of ablation.
In experimental group ablation procedure was followed with uncovered self-expandable metal stent insertion.
Brachytherapy procedure (performed in case of cholangiocarcinoma as institutional treatment standard) was performed through 5F applicator by after loading system of iridium radiation source (HDR brachytherapy, applicator temporarily placed into a drain for 3-4 days). Prescribed dose was 15-24Gy at distance of 1.0cm in 3-4 fractions.
Analyzed characteristics:
Specific therapeutic procedures e.g. systemic chemotherapy, brachytherapy indicated by multidisciplinary tumor board were recorded. Laboratory tests were evaluated withing 24 hours before and after the RFA (AMS, INR, APTT, GMT, total bilirubin, ALP, ALT, AST). The time of initial diagnosis, drainage procedures, ablation and stenting were referred to patient survival. Patients underwent repeated ambulatory follow-up in 3months period (dedicated ultrasound performed by interventional radiologist, in case of bilirubin and obstructive enzymes elevation intensified follow up was performed). Patients time of death was gathered from record of central database of insured persons or from hospital information system. Procedural complications were graded in consensus by interventional radiologists and oncologist according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Primary stent patency:
Stent patency was defined as the duration from the insertion of the stent until the date of closure. If the cause of death was directly related to stent failure, the date of death was defined as time of stent closure. If no stent failure occurred (i.e. the absence of increased total serum bilirubin levels or the absence of dilation of intrahepatic bile ducts on CT or US examination even if total serum bilirubin level was increased), stent patency was considered as censored at the date of death or at the end of the study period.
Statistical methods:
Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Basic characteristics were summarized by absolute and relative frequencies and compared using Fisher's exact test (categorical variables), continuous characteristics compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Survival parameters were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, differences in survival were evaluated by log-rank test. Relationships between survival parameters and endoluminal biliary pathway ablation prior to stent insertion were modelled using one-dimensional Cox regression models and described using a risk ratio (HR) of 95% CI for HR and a p-value corresponding to the relevant regression coefficient. The level of statistical significance in all analyses was set at α = 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental arm - endoluminal RFA
standard treatment protocol for malignant biliary stenosis + endoluminal RFA prior metal stent insertion
Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK
Randomised patients in selected arm received endoluminal RFA by 8F catheter (Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK) before stenting procedure. Repeated ablations were processed through stenotic areas of bile ducts (10W, 90-120s, Rita 1500, Angiodynamics Ltd), all drained biliary tracts were used for introducing catheter and performance of ablation. Ablation procedure was followed with uncovered self-expandable metal stent insertion.
Control arm
standard treatment protocol for malignant biliary stenosis which includes metal stent insertion
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK
Randomised patients in selected arm received endoluminal RFA by 8F catheter (Habib™ EndoHPB; Boston Scientific, US; former EMcision Ltd., UK) before stenting procedure. Repeated ablations were processed through stenotic areas of bile ducts (10W, 90-120s, Rita 1500, Angiodynamics Ltd), all drained biliary tracts were used for introducing catheter and performance of ablation. Ablation procedure was followed with uncovered self-expandable metal stent insertion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* indication of implantation of SEMS by multidisciplinary indication committee
* signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Karnofsky performance status of \<80%
* history or concomitant treatment with intraarterial oncologic therapies (eg, hepatic arterial infusion, chemoembolization)
* ongoing infections resistant to antibiotic therapy
* clinical or biochemical signs of liver or renal failure
* INR ≥ 1.3, serum albumin ≤ 35 g/l, haemoglobin ≤ 100 g/l, serum creatinine ≥ 200μmol/l
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brno University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tomas Andrasina
Tomáš Andrašina, MD, PhD; Assistant professor, Head of Non-vascular interventions and Computed Tomography of the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tomáš Andrašina, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brno University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brno University Hospital
Brno, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FNBKRNM0002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.