Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
140 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2017-06-08
Study Completion Date
2020-05-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are the most common causes of malignant biliary obstruction. They are diseases of increasing incidence and unfavorable prognosis. Only a minority of patients have a localized disease and are indicated for surgery with a chance of long-term survival. Locally advanced and metastatic tumors are treated with palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; the results of such treatments are unsatisfactory. The average survival of patients with unresectable disease is 6 months and only 5 - 10 % of patients survive 5 years. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be used, however only with a palliative effect. Biliary drainage is an integral part of palliative treatment. Endoscopically or percutaneously placed stents improve quality of life, decrease cholestasis and pruritus, but do not significantly improve survival. Biliary stents get occluded over time, possibly resulting in acute cholangitis and require repeated replacement. Endoluminal biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), locally active endoscopic methods, have been increasingly used in recent years in palliative treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In photodynamic therapy, improved survival has been shown in two randomized controlled trials; however the technique suffers from technical complexity, high cost and low availability. In RFA, application of low voltage high frequency current during radiofrequency ablation results in tissue destruction by heat. Its antitumor effect may also be related to systemic changes in antitumor immunity. The use of endoluminal biliary RFA has so far been reported only in small retrospective cohorts of patients.
The aim of this randomized study is to compare efficacy of RFA plus stenting to stenting alone in palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with survival as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are stent patency, immediate and late complications, quality of life and effects on anti-tumor immunity in the RFA group.
The aim of this randomized study is to compare efficacy of RFA plus stenting to stenting alone in palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with survival as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are stent patency, immediate and late complications, quality of life and effects on anti-tumor immunity in the RFA group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction Due to Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT05546372
Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
RECRUITING
NA
RFA RCT for Pancreatic or Bile Duct Cancer
NCT02166190
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable
TERMINATED
NA
Endoscopic Biliary RFA of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT02582541
Cholangiocarcinoma
Bile Duct Obstruction
UNKNOWN
NA
Endoscopic Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
NCT01721174
Pancreatic Cancer
Cholangiocarcinoma
TERMINATED
NA
The ID- RFA Trial: A Trial of Intraductal Radio-frequency Ablation (ID-RFA) Plus Biliary Stenting Versus Biliary Stenting Alone for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction.
NCT04941924
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
UNKNOWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer are by far the two most common causes of malignant bile duct obstruction. Cholangiocarcinoma is an adenocarcinoma originating in the bile duct whereas pancreatic cancer is an adenocarcinoma derived from pancreatic ductal cells. The incidence rates of both diseases have been rising over the past decades. Both diseases still have a very unfavorable prognosis with 5 year survival rates as low as 5-10%. Surgery represents the only therapeutic modality with a curative potential, however most patients are non-eligible for surgical treatment at the time of diagnosis. Patients present with either distant metastases, have a locally advanced disease or are unfit for surgery because of advanced age and/or co-morbidities. The prognosis of patients with unresectable bile duct or pancreatic cancer is poor with a median survival time of about 6 months. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy provide only a slight survival benefit and thus have only palliative intent.
Most patients with cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer present with bile duct obstruction in the course of their disease. Bile duct obstruction relief is an important part of palliation therapy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with bile duct stenting is the method of choice with a high rate of technical success and a lower complication rate compared to surgery. Biliary stents are either plastic or metal (self-expandable metal stents, SEMS). SEMS can be covered, uncovered or partially covered. Plastic stents are cheaper and easier to exchange but have a shorter patency compared to metal stents. Metal stents have been shown to improve survival of patients with proximal malignant biliary obstruction. Both plastic and metal become occluded in a significant proportion of patients, especially in those with a longer life expectancy. Stent occlusion is often an acute event leading to sepsis and a prompt intervention is required. Failure of achieving adequate drainage may result in severe cholangitis and death.
Photodynamic therapy has been used for bile duct tumor ablation for more than a decade. It is a two stage process in which a photosensitizing agent is taken by the tumor tissue and is than activated by light of a specific wave length. Two randomized trials showed improved survival of patients treated with PDT plus stenting compared to stenting alone. However, side effects of photodynamic therapy such as phototoxicity, high costs and limited availability restrict the use of PDT.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), by means of alternating high-frequency current, generates heat that results in coagulation necrosis of tissue. It is widely used to treat liver tumors or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Endoluminal biliary RFA has become possible upon availability of narrow ERCP RFA catheters and represents a new modality of intraductal tumor ablation. The probe can be introduced over a 0.035-inch wire through a standard endoscope, thus allowing endoscopic ablation of malignant bile duct obstruction. The bipolar catheter has multiple circumferential electrodes at the distal tip. The coagulative effect is delivered in the area between the two electrodes.
A few human non-randomized case series investigating the safety and efficiency of RFA were reported. Steel at al reported their results in 22 patients with malignant bile duct obstruction (16 patients with pancreatic cancer and 6 patients with cholangiocarcinoma). Immediate, 30 day complication rates and 90 day stent patency were evaluated as primary parameters. Intraductal RFA was followed by a SEMS placement. One patient developed asymptomatic elevation of amylase, one patients developed rigors and two patients developed cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy. All except 3 patients achieved 90 day stent patency.
In a recent study of Sharaiha et al, 26 patients with pancreatic or bile duct cancer underwent RFA followed by plastic or metal stent placement. They were compared to 40 matched controls who underwent only stenting. Technical success rate was 100%. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed RFA to be an independent predictor of survival \[HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), p = 0.012\] together with age and receipt of chemotherapy \[HR 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.011; HR 0.26 (0.10-0.70), p = 0.007\]. Surprisingly, SEMS patency rates were the same across all groups.
In an Austrian national retrospective study, 84 ablations were performed in 58 patients in 11 centers. Cholangiocarcinoma was present in 45 patients. Technical feasibility was 100%, however multiple complications occurred (1 liver infarct, 5 cholangitis, 3 hemobilia, 2 sepsis, 1 gall-bladder empyema, 1 liver coma).
RFA was also investigated in pancreatic cancers only. In a retrospective comparison of 23 patients and 46 controls, the median survival was better in the RFA group (226 vs. 123 days, p=0,01). The median stent patency was not different.
The safety profile of RFA seems to be acceptable, however severe complications have occured. In the study of Tal et al, 3 cases of bleeding were reported, two of them resulted in death. In all of these patients, plastic stents were used.
Increasing evidence indicates that RFA might stimulate anti-tumor immunity. Active anti-cancer immune responses depend on efficient presentation of tumor antigens and cytokine-mediated stimulatory signaling. Tumor cells are generally regarded as poor stimulators of T-cells. In contrast, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are highly specialized in this function and are therefore important in the process of stimulation of T-cell responses to tumors. RFA has been shown to stimulate anti-tumor immunity through the induction of heat shock proteins, especially HSP 70. HSPs have the capacity to affect the immunogenicity of tumor cells, to chaperone antigenic peptides and deliver them into APCs, thus activate and regulate innate and adaptive immunity.
Based on the available evidence, RFA seems to be a technically feasible technique of malignant bile duct stricture ablation with a favorable safety profile. Retrospective case series have reported improved stent patency and survival in cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients following RFA. Thus, endoluminal RFA may represent a novel treatment modality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. For this to happen, however, prospectively obtained comparative data with established treatment, i.e. biliary stenting, regarding safety and efficiency are necessary.
The investigators aim to compare endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stenting vs. stenting alone for malignant bile duct obstruction not eligible for surgical resection in a randomized controlled trial.
Most patients with cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer present with bile duct obstruction in the course of their disease. Bile duct obstruction relief is an important part of palliation therapy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with bile duct stenting is the method of choice with a high rate of technical success and a lower complication rate compared to surgery. Biliary stents are either plastic or metal (self-expandable metal stents, SEMS). SEMS can be covered, uncovered or partially covered. Plastic stents are cheaper and easier to exchange but have a shorter patency compared to metal stents. Metal stents have been shown to improve survival of patients with proximal malignant biliary obstruction. Both plastic and metal become occluded in a significant proportion of patients, especially in those with a longer life expectancy. Stent occlusion is often an acute event leading to sepsis and a prompt intervention is required. Failure of achieving adequate drainage may result in severe cholangitis and death.
Photodynamic therapy has been used for bile duct tumor ablation for more than a decade. It is a two stage process in which a photosensitizing agent is taken by the tumor tissue and is than activated by light of a specific wave length. Two randomized trials showed improved survival of patients treated with PDT plus stenting compared to stenting alone. However, side effects of photodynamic therapy such as phototoxicity, high costs and limited availability restrict the use of PDT.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), by means of alternating high-frequency current, generates heat that results in coagulation necrosis of tissue. It is widely used to treat liver tumors or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Endoluminal biliary RFA has become possible upon availability of narrow ERCP RFA catheters and represents a new modality of intraductal tumor ablation. The probe can be introduced over a 0.035-inch wire through a standard endoscope, thus allowing endoscopic ablation of malignant bile duct obstruction. The bipolar catheter has multiple circumferential electrodes at the distal tip. The coagulative effect is delivered in the area between the two electrodes.
A few human non-randomized case series investigating the safety and efficiency of RFA were reported. Steel at al reported their results in 22 patients with malignant bile duct obstruction (16 patients with pancreatic cancer and 6 patients with cholangiocarcinoma). Immediate, 30 day complication rates and 90 day stent patency were evaluated as primary parameters. Intraductal RFA was followed by a SEMS placement. One patient developed asymptomatic elevation of amylase, one patients developed rigors and two patients developed cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy. All except 3 patients achieved 90 day stent patency.
In a recent study of Sharaiha et al, 26 patients with pancreatic or bile duct cancer underwent RFA followed by plastic or metal stent placement. They were compared to 40 matched controls who underwent only stenting. Technical success rate was 100%. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed RFA to be an independent predictor of survival \[HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), p = 0.012\] together with age and receipt of chemotherapy \[HR 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.011; HR 0.26 (0.10-0.70), p = 0.007\]. Surprisingly, SEMS patency rates were the same across all groups.
In an Austrian national retrospective study, 84 ablations were performed in 58 patients in 11 centers. Cholangiocarcinoma was present in 45 patients. Technical feasibility was 100%, however multiple complications occurred (1 liver infarct, 5 cholangitis, 3 hemobilia, 2 sepsis, 1 gall-bladder empyema, 1 liver coma).
RFA was also investigated in pancreatic cancers only. In a retrospective comparison of 23 patients and 46 controls, the median survival was better in the RFA group (226 vs. 123 days, p=0,01). The median stent patency was not different.
The safety profile of RFA seems to be acceptable, however severe complications have occured. In the study of Tal et al, 3 cases of bleeding were reported, two of them resulted in death. In all of these patients, plastic stents were used.
Increasing evidence indicates that RFA might stimulate anti-tumor immunity. Active anti-cancer immune responses depend on efficient presentation of tumor antigens and cytokine-mediated stimulatory signaling. Tumor cells are generally regarded as poor stimulators of T-cells. In contrast, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are highly specialized in this function and are therefore important in the process of stimulation of T-cell responses to tumors. RFA has been shown to stimulate anti-tumor immunity through the induction of heat shock proteins, especially HSP 70. HSPs have the capacity to affect the immunogenicity of tumor cells, to chaperone antigenic peptides and deliver them into APCs, thus activate and regulate innate and adaptive immunity.
Based on the available evidence, RFA seems to be a technically feasible technique of malignant bile duct stricture ablation with a favorable safety profile. Retrospective case series have reported improved stent patency and survival in cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients following RFA. Thus, endoluminal RFA may represent a novel treatment modality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. For this to happen, however, prospectively obtained comparative data with established treatment, i.e. biliary stenting, regarding safety and efficiency are necessary.
The investigators aim to compare endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stenting vs. stenting alone for malignant bile duct obstruction not eligible for surgical resection in a randomized controlled trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Cholangiocarcinoma
Pancreas Cancer
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Randomized controlled study
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RFA plus stenting
Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation followed by biliary stenting
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
radiofrequency ablation
Biliary stenting
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
biliary stenting
Stenting alone
Biliary stenting alone
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Biliary stenting
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
biliary stenting
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiofrequency ablation
radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Biliary stenting
biliary stenting
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age over 18
* Pathologically confirmed malignant bile duct obstruction (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer)
* Laboratory signs of biliary obstruction
* Non-resectable disease (distant metastasis, locally advanced disease, patient related factors) based on a multidisciplinary team decision
* Capability of giving informed consent
* Life expectancy greater than 3 months
* Pathologically confirmed malignant bile duct obstruction (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer)
* Laboratory signs of biliary obstruction
* Non-resectable disease (distant metastasis, locally advanced disease, patient related factors) based on a multidisciplinary team decision
* Capability of giving informed consent
* Life expectancy greater than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Unstable for ERC
* Inability to give informed consent
* Pregnancy
* Uncorrected coagulopathy
* Concomitant biliary oncological endoluminal therapy (photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy)
* Cardiac pacemaker
* Inability to give informed consent
* Pregnancy
* Uncorrected coagulopathy
* Concomitant biliary oncological endoluminal therapy (photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy)
* Cardiac pacemaker
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tomas Hucl
Vice-chairman, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Prague, , Czechia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Czechia
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ilyas SI, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013 Dec;145(6):1215-29. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, Heaton N, Karani J, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Tait P, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV, Thomas HC, Wasan H; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1657-69. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301748. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rerknimitr R, Angsuwatcharakon P, Ratanachu-ek T, Khor CJ, Ponnudurai R, Moon JH, Seo DW, Pantongrag-Brown L, Sangchan A, Pisespongsa P, Akaraviputh T, Reddy ND, Maydeo A, Itoi T, Pausawasdi N, Punamiya S, Attasaranya S, Devereaux B, Ramchandani M, Goh KL; Asia-Pacific Working Group on Hepatobiliary Cancers. Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):593-607. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12128.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992 Dec 19-26;340(8834-8835):1488-92. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sangchan A, Kongkasame W, Pugkhem A, Jenwitheesuk K, Mairiang P. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jul;76(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 May 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Curley SA, Izzo F. Radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. Int J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr;7(2):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s101470200010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE, Wolfsen HC, Wang KK, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Mashimo H, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Edmundowicz SA, Madanick RD, Peery AF, Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ, Kimmey MB, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Dumot JA, Falk GW, Galanko JA, Jobe BA, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Sharma P, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):460-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.061. Epub 2011 May 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zacharoulis D, Lazoura O, Sioka E, Potamianos S, Tzovaras G, Nicholls J, Koukoulis G, Habib N. Habib EndoHPB: a novel endobiliary radiofrequency ablation device. An experimental study. J Invest Surg. 2013 Feb;26(1):6-10. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.681832. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sharaiha RZ, Natov N, Glockenberg KS, Widmer J, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Comparison of metal stenting with radiofrequency ablation versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures: is there an added benefit? Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12):3099-102. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3264-6. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Monga A, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of cholangiocarcinoma: new palliative treatment modality (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):935-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Dec 18. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dolak W, Schreiber F, Schwaighofer H, Gschwantler M, Plieschnegger W, Ziachehabi A, Mayer A, Kramer L, Kopecky A, Schrutka-Kolbl C, Wolkersdorfer G, Madl C, Berr F, Trauner M, Puspok A; Austrian Biliary RFA Study Group. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: a nationwide retrospective study of 84 consecutive applications. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3232-9. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kallis Y, Phillips N, Steel A, Kaltsidis H, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Analysis of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Biliary Malignant Strictures in Pancreatic Cancer Suggests Potential Survival Benefit. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3449-55. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3731-8. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tal AO, Vermehren J, Friedrich-Rust M, Bojunga J, Sarrazin C, Zeuzem S, Trojan J, Albert JG. Intraductal endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hilar non-resectable malignant bile duct obstruction. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan 16;6(1):13-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i1.13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wu F. Heat-Based Tumor Ablation: Role of the Immune Response. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;880:131-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U, Caca K, Uhlmann D, Schoppmeyer K, Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Mossner J, Hauss J, Wiedmann M. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):230-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217639.10331.47.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jarosova J, Zarivnijova L, Cibulkova I, Mares J, Macinga P, Hujova A, Falt P, Urban O, Hajer J, Spicak J, Hucl T. Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial. Gut. 2023 Nov 24;72(12):2286-2293. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329700.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IKEM RFA CCA PC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Radiation Stent Versus Self-expanding Metallic Stents (SEMS) for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stricture
NCT01320241
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Radioactive Stents for Treatment of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT02238613
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination With Metallic Biliary Stenting in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT04611100
COMPLETED
NA
Endoluminal Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stenosis
NCT04801719
COMPLETED
NA
Unilateral Stenting Versus Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT02649712
COMPLETED
NA
Palliative Biliary Stenting on the Quality of Life of Patients With Unresectable Carcinoma Gallbladder With Hiliar Block.
NCT00391183
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
Endoscopic Biliary Co-axial Stent Placement Plus/Minus Use of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Clearance of Occluded Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) in Patients With Distal Biliary Obstruction From Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies
NCT02340728
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Biliary Stenting With or Without Photodynamic Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma or Other Biliary Tract Tumors That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT00513539
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Comparison of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Photodynamic Therapy for Inoperable Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT01739465
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
Single Versus Multiple Deployment of Metallic Stents for Inoperable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT02166970
COMPLETED
NA
Percutaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Metal Stent for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT02108145
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgical Bypass for Low Bile Duct Obstruction by Cancer of the Pancreatic Head
NCT00753441
TERMINATED
NA
Partially Covered Metal Stents Efficacy in Biliary Drainage of Malignant Extra-hepatic Biliary Obstruction
NCT04431427
UNKNOWN
NA
Winged Perimeter Versus Traditional Plastic Biliary Stent for Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT01514214
COMPLETED
NA
Partially Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent for Malignant Distal Biliary Stricture
NCT02178618
COMPLETED
NA
Biodegradable Stents in Liver Transplant RecipIents for Treatment of Biliary Anastomotic Strictures
NCT06716541
RECRUITING
NA
Self-expandable Metal Stents Versus Multiple Plastic Stents for Palliation of Biliary Obstruction
NCT03821025
UNKNOWN
NA
I-125 Seeds Loaded Stent Insertion for Inoperable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT04779788
UNKNOWN
NA
Patency of a Prototype Large Plastic Biliary Stent in the Palliation of Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures.
NCT01590394
TERMINATED
NA
The Patency Period of the New Plastic Anti-reflux Biliary Stent
NCT01142921
TERMINATED
NA
Study of the WallFlex™ Biliary Partially-covered Stent for the Palliative Treatment of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT00713427
COMPLETED
NA
Two Bilateral Metal Stenting in Hilar Malignancy
NCT01141088
UNKNOWN
NA
Comparison Between Two Methods of Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Obstruction
NCT01622803
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3