Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2017-05-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, there are only two therapies. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as an alternative to PDT, given the lower adverse event profile. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures. Based on the published data, RFA provides palliation and seems to increase survival duration in pancreatic cancer. Our own limited experience shows the same. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to definitely confirm the benefit of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing increased survival time and quality of life in patients with non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. These benefits will improve clinical practice by making RFA the new standard of care for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic cancer (PC). It will also enhance scientific knowledge by opening the door for new opportunities, e.g. RFA as a potential use for neoadjuvant therapy or as a downstaging agent for surgically resectable patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
NCT01721174
Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Biliary Obstruction Due to Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT05546372
Endoscopic Biliary Co-axial Stent Placement Plus/Minus Use of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Clearance of Occluded Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) in Patients With Distal Biliary Obstruction From Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies
NCT02340728
RFA for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT03166436
Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgical Bypass for Low Bile Duct Obstruction by Cancer of the Pancreatic Head
NCT00753441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Metal stenting results in biliary decompression in greater than 80% of cases with a lower complication rate than surgery. When compared to plastic stents, SEMSs present a significantly reduced risk of recurrent biliary obstruction. SEMSs are also more cost effective than plastic stents in patients with a life expectancy of longer than 4 months. Despite their numerous benefits, SEMS become occluded in up to 50% of patients in the first 6-8 months. Covered SEMSs are not resistant to tumor overgrowth or sludge formation and thus stent occlusion results in increased morbidity and mortality.
This relief is temporary since stents tend to become obstructed. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been previously evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality in patients with biliary obstruction from cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as in a similar manner to PDT, in addition given the lower adverse event profile, it may confer a greater patient tolerance. EndoHPB, the intervention arm, is an endoscopic bipolar catheter designed to ablate tissue in malignant tumors within luminal structures, such as the biliary tree or pancreatic ducts. By using radiofrequency (RF) energy to heat the tissue in the duct prior to insertion of the stent, the surrounding tissue becomes coagulated and this may delay tumor growth and the time before the stent lumen becomes blocked. Thereby, allowing increased periods between the need for intervention and further stent deployment. If EndoHPB use of luminal RF is demonstrated to be effective in luminal tumor ablation, it may have an additional role as a form of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. RFA uses a high frequency alternating current to generate heat and achieve coagulative necrosis when in contact with tissue. Within the bile duct, RFA appears to be safe and may result in decreased benign epithelial hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Two recent studies have shown efficacy and safety of RFA in advanced pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, retrospective collection of data from a cohort of 26 patients treated with endobiliary RFA for malignant biliary obstruction in our Institution confirmed the safety of this approach and suggested a potential survival benefit at 90 and 180 days post treatment compared to matched controls.
A pilot study was initiated and IRB approved at the Weill Cornell Medical College in 2011 with primary investigator Dr. Michel Kahaleh. The study was closed in Nov 2013 as the results showed that RFA significantly increased the bile duct diameter. Analysis also showed that survival duration was slightly increased in the Pancreatic Cancer group.
* Hypothesis: Luminal application of RF energy using EndoHPB in the bile duct of patients with cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer provides ablation of tumor causing biliary obstruction(s). Effectiveness will assessed by looking at the change in diameter(s), on cholangiography and assess time till stent occlusion.
* Study Design: Randomized, Controlled, 2- arm, Non-Blinded, Randomised controlled trial Treatment group: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with RFA and biliary stenting.
Control group: ERCP with biliary stenting only
* Primary outcome measure: is survival time, measured from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive.
* Secondary outcome measure: Number of Participants with Adverse Events. To assess safety of an endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency catheter (EndoHPB) in the management of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
* Condition : - Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Cancer
* Intervention: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation using the ENDOHPB probe.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiofrequency Ablation (EndoHbp probe)
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Stenting only
Stenting only
Stenting only
Stenting only
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Stenting only
Stenting only
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma unsuitable for surgical resection. Criteria of unresectability being based on 1) metastatic disease or 2) locally advanced. Subjects that are deemed to be unresectable will be determined by a surgeon or treating oncologist.
* Biliary obstruction
* Subjects capable of giving informed consent
* Life expectancy of at least 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient unstable for ERCP or has failed ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography )
* Inability to give informed consent
* Uncorrected coagulopathy
* Pregnant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Reem Z Sharaiha, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1403014843
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.