IRS(Irradiation Stent) vs. CS(Conventional Stent) Insertion in Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction

NCT ID: NCT02001779

Last Updated: 2017-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

328 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stenting the malignant biliary obstruction is considered to be the preferred palliation modality to relieve pruritus,cholangitis,pain and jaundice in patients without surgical indications of malignant biliary obstruction.An unicentral clinical trial has demonstrated the safety and technical feasibility of an irradiation biliary stent insertion in patients with biliary obstruction caused by adenocarcinomas, such a treatment seems have benefits in relieving jaundice and extending survival when compared to a conventional biliary stent.However,the small sample size,the population distribution of two groups will influence the final results in obtaining a powerful statistical conclusion.Therefore,a multicentric study was designed to prospectively compared the responses to the treatment with this irradiation biliary stent versus the conventional biliary self-expandable stent in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Malignant biliary obstruction is a common condition caused by various carcinomas.The clinical process is usually silent and insidious,only 10-20% patients can be surgically removed once obstructive jaundice occurred.The long-term survival rate after resection remain dismal.Relief of obstructive jaundice plays major role on prognosis in patients without surgical indications.For unresectable patients,stenting the biliary obstruction is considered to be the preferred palliation modality to relieve pruritus,cholangitis,pain and jaundice.Although a number of new techniques for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction have been developed,there have been no significant differences in survival or quality of life comparing surgery bypass versus plastic stent insertion,metal stent insertion versus plastic stents insertion,or covered stent versus uncovered stents insertion in such patients.Our previous unicentric clinical trial has demonstrated the safety and technical feasibility of a biliary intraluminal irradiation stent insertion in patients with biliary obstruction caused by adenocarcinomas, such a treatment seems have benefits in relieving jaundice and extending survival when compared to a conventional biliary stent.However,the small sample size,the population distribution of two groups will influence the final results in obtaining a powerful statistical conclusion in the overall survival and stent patency between two groups.Therefore,a multicentric study was designed to prospectively compared the responses to the treatment with this irradiation biliary stent versus the conventional biliary self-expandable stent in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biliary SEMS loaded with 125I seeds

A self-expandable metallic biliary stent loaded with 125 iodine seeds is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Biliary SEMS loaded with 125I seeds

Intervention Type DEVICE

A self-expandable metallic biliary stent loaded with 125 iodine seeds is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Conventional biliary SEMS

A self-expandable metallic biliary stent is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional biliary SEMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

A self-expandable metallic stent is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biliary SEMS loaded with 125I seeds

A self-expandable metallic biliary stent loaded with 125 iodine seeds is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional biliary SEMS

A self-expandable metallic stent is inserted in patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical,histological or pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction
* Unresectability or refusal to be surgically treated
* The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) scores from 0 to 3
* With symptoms such as jaundice related to biliary obstruction
* Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study
* Biliary obstruction of Bismuthe-Corlette,type I and II

Exclusion Criteria

* Benign biliary obstruction
* The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) score of 4
* Biliary tract stricture that could not be dilated enough to pass the delivery system
* Presence of metallic biliary stent or bile duct surgery
* Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography(PTC) procedure was contraindicated
* Active hepatitis
* Biliary obstruction of Bismuthe-Corlette,type Ⅲ and Ⅳ
* Uncooperative or could not provide authorization and signature
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhongda Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gao-jun Teng

Professor of Radiology & Chair,Department of Radiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gao-jun Teng, Ph.D,MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zhongda Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhongda Hospital,Southeast University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhu HD, Guo JH, Huang M, Ji JS, Xu H, Lu J, Li HL, Wang WH, Li YL, Ni CF, Shi HB, Xiao EH, Lv WF, Sun JH, Xu K, Han GH, Du LA, Ren WX, Li MQ, Mao AW, Xiang H, Zhang KX, Min J, Zhu GY, Su C, Chen L, Teng GJ. Irradiation stents vs. conventional metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter trial. J Hepatol. 2018 May;68(5):970-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29331343 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IR-C-STENT-MBO-83272121

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.