Home
Clinical Trials
Wear of Enamel Antagonist to ...

Wear of Enamel Antagonist to Two Different Types of Monolithic Zirconia Monolithic Zirconia

Last Updated: 2021-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the wear of enamel opposed by Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia compared to that of enamel opposed by Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical Evaluation of Wear Behavior of Human Enamel and Chipping of Veneered Zirconia Against Monolithic Zirconia

NCT03295513

Broken Tooth With Complication Non Vital Teeth Mutilated Teeth

UNKNOWN NA

Wear of Enamel Against Polished Zirconia Crowns

NCT02289781

Tooth Wear

COMPLETED

Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities

NCT04738604

Class I Dental Caries

UNKNOWN NA

Wear of Enamel Antagonist to ZLS Crowns

NCT04914962

Wear, Tooth Wear, Occlusal

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of Antagonist Wear Behavior and Patient Satisfaction of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass When Compared to Monolithic Zirconia

NCT03697018

Wear of the Natural Enamel

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the wear of enamel opposed by Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia compared to that of enamel opposed by Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia Teeth preparation and impressions, placement and permanent cementation of the final restoration using resin cement, and optical scanning of both the restoration and the opposing tooth. Follow up postoperatively after six and twelve months, and optical scanning of both the restoration and the opposing tooth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wear, Occlusal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tested material

Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia (Intervention)

Group Type OTHER

Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear

comparator material

Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia (Comparator)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia

Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia

Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

All subjects are required to be:

1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations.
3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures.
4. Patients planned for a single coverage restoration in the posterior area.
5. Patients with a natural (not crowned) opposing antagonist.
6. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years 2. Patients with severe clenching or bruxing habits. 3. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases 4. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients 5. Pregnant women 6. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 7. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations 8. Lack of opposing dentition at the area of interest. 9. Presence of dental prosthesis in the opposing arch at the area of interest.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes