Evaluation of the Intra-observer Agreement of the HEP Score in Surgical Intensive Care.
NCT ID: NCT04782843
Last Updated: 2021-03-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
124 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-01
2021-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) in Preventing Hypotension in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT07097454
Peripheral Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Post-spinal Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Surgeries
NCT07279805
Intraoperative Systemic Arterial Hypotension Secondary to Beach Positioning
NCT03451565
Peripheral Perfusion Index in Acute Surgical Patients
NCT03757442
Predictive Factors for Massive Transfusion During Liver Transplantation
NCT05763446
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of this score is therefore not recommended in everyday practice.
However, the literature shows a higher diagnostic value of the HEP score especially for resuscitation-type patients, as well as when used by an operator with little experience. This could be due to greater detail given in consideration of other causes of thrombocytopenia (17).
The main objective of this work is to assess the intraoperator reproducibility in the calculation of the HEP score in a population of intensive care patients.
The secondary objectives will aim to:
* Evaluate inter-operator reproducibility
* Determine if the reproducibility of the HEP score is influenced by:
The patient's sex The type of heparin used (LMWH vs UFH) The severity of the patient (IGS2 score) A history of cardiac or orthopedic surgery
The expected consistent benefits allow validation of the HEP score in surgical intensive care (cf. EVHEP-TIH study).
This would allow a better assessment of the pre-test probabilities of TIH with the performance of biological tests.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort
he retrospective cohort studied includes all the patients included in a previous study carried out in our center, the objective of which was to study the diagnostic performance of the HEP score in surgical intensive care.
The cohort studied is made up of all patients admitted for surgical resuscitation between October 2011 and October 2013 and validating the following criteria:
* Inclusion criteria: any adult patient (age ≥ 18 years), admitted to surgical intensive care, treated with heparin (UFH or LMWH), and suspected of TIH by a clinician in the department according to the criteria of the SFAR 2002.
* Non-inclusion criteria: minor patients, pregnant women and adults incapable.
HEP score assessement
Assessement of the HEP score between 2 physician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HEP score assessement
Assessement of the HEP score between 2 physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guillaume Besch, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRU J. Minjoz à Besançon
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cuker A, Arepally G, Crowther MA, Rice L, Datko F, Hook K, Propert KJ, Kuter DJ, Ortel TL, Konkle BA, Cines DB. The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) Score: a novel pre-test probability model for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinion. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Dec;8(12):2642-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04059.x.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Princeps article
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/586
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.