Cross-legged Versus Traditional Sitting Position for the Success of Epidural Analgesia During Labor
NCT ID: NCT04754282
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
457 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-24
2022-03-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
According to anesthetists' experience in the obstetrical anesthesia unit at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital, a cross-legged sitting position is comfortable for parturients, restricts interfering movements during the procedure, and provides adequate widening of interspinous spaces. This position results in knees and hips flexion, tilting the pelvis backward and opening the interspinous spaces, while limiting muscular strain to maintain the position. However, literature on this matter is scarce.
The aim of this study is to prove the superiority of the cross-legged position for successful placement of the epidural analgesia catheter at the first puncture without needle reorientation compared to a traditional sitting position on the edge of the bed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Ultrasound Help With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients?
NCT02207972
An Observational Study Investigating the Positioning of Epidural Catheters and Their Function During Labour Analgesia
NCT02924779
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida
NCT06766812
Acceptability Assessment of an Optimized Birthing Position
NCT04056793
Ultrasound Predictors of Difficulty in Performing Epidural Anesthesia for Labor in Pregnant Patients.
NCT07056166
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The 2016 national perinatal survey conducted by the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and the Directorate of Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (DREES) in France revealed that more than 80% of women had chosen to benefit from an epidural analgesia during labour. The first puncture failure rate ranges from 3% to almost 40% depending on the study. Identified factors for difficult epidural analgesia catheter placement were: non-palpable spinous processes, obesity, spine deformity, inability for the patient to maintain an adequate position and poor experience of the operator.
The success of an epidural analgesia catheter placement depends on the parturient position. A poor posture can increase the number of punctures, patient discomfort, and risk of complications. An adequate position reverses lumbar lordosis, facilitating the access to the intervertebral space. Different positions have been described: the lateral decubitus, the traditional sitting position, and its variants such as the squatting position, the "hamstring stretch" position, the "pendant position" (with a bilateral axillary support) and more recently the cross-legged position. In most cases, insertion of the epidural analgesia catheter is performed in sitting position or in lateral decubitus, the choice being generally guided by the preference of the anesthetist.
According to anesthetists' experience in the obstetrical anesthesia unit at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital, a cross-legged sitting position is comfortable for parturients, restricts interfering movements during the procedure, and provides adequate widening of interspinous spaces. This position results in knees and hips flexion, tilting the pelvis backward and opening the interspinous spaces, while limiting muscular strain to maintain the position. However, literature on this matter is scarce.
The aim of this study is to prove the superiority of the cross-legged position for successful placement of the epidural analgesia catheter at the first puncture without needle reorientation compared to a traditional sitting position on the edge of the bed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traditional sitting position
Expecting women are positioned in a traditional sitting position for epidural analgesia catheter placement during labour.
Position of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Traditional Sitting Position (TSP)
Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days.
Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh.
The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.
Cross-legged sitting position
Expecting women are positioned in a crosse-legged sitting position for epidural analgesia catheter placement during labour.
Position of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP)
Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days.
Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh.
The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Position of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Traditional Sitting Position (TSP)
Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days.
Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh.
The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.
Position of labouring women for epidural analgesia catheter placement : Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP)
Labouring women admitted to the delivery room of Necker Enfants Malades hospital, requesting an epidural analgesia for labour, and willing to participate in our study will be randomized in the Traditional Sitting Position (TSP) group on odd days or in the Cross-legged Sitting Position (CSP) group on even days.
Patients in the TSP group seat on the edge of the bed, their feet laid on a support set next to the bed. Patients in the CSP group also seat on the edge the bed, but in a so-called "tailor" position, their knees bent, their hips flexed and in abduction, their feet under each contralateral thigh.
The epidural catheter will be placed according to standard local practice in either of the groups.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent
* French speaking patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Impossibility for the patient to seat in a cross-legged position
* No health insurance
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hawa KEITA-MEYER, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Kevin SEREY, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Serey K, Osse L, Repesse X, Babou J, Banna L, Ayoub M, Elseblani R, Brebion M, Keita H. Cross-legged position versus traditional sitting position for epidural catheter insertion for labor analgesia: a non-randomized prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Feb;57:103938. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103938. Epub 2023 Oct 11. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-A02267-32
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
APHP201193
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.