Different Spinal Needles Sizes and Dural Puncture Epidural For Labor Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT03389945
Last Updated: 2020-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-13
2019-03-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Despite the benefits associated, the supportive literature remains scarce. No trial has determined if similar results could be obtained with a smaller needle.
In this trial, DPE using 25- and 27-gauge (G) spinal needles are compared. The main outcome will be the time required to obtain a pain score ≤ 1 using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). The hypothesis is that that both needle sizes will result in similar onset times and therefore designing the current study as an equivalence trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Lumbar Epidural on Onset of Labor Analgesia
NCT02412969
Sacral Spread of Sensory Block After Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Compared With Epidural for Labour Analgesia
NCT05217134
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida
NCT06766812
DPE Technique in Labor Epidural for Morbidly Obese Women
NCT03074695
Epidural vs. Dural Puncture Epidural in Labor Analgesia
NCT06849726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Patients will receive a dural puncture epidural block with a 25 gauge spinal needle.
25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Dural puncture epidural analgesia using a 25G pencil point spinal needle at a lumbar interspace.
Then 20ml of bupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl 2ug/ml will be injected in the epidural space.
27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Patients will receive a dural puncture epidural block with a 27 gauge spinal needle.
27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Dural puncture epidural analgesia using a 27G pencil point spinal needle at a lumbar interspace.
Then 20ml of bupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl 2ug/ml will be injected in the epidural space.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Dural puncture epidural analgesia using a 25G pencil point spinal needle at a lumbar interspace.
Then 20ml of bupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl 2ug/ml will be injected in the epidural space.
27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block
Dural puncture epidural analgesia using a 27G pencil point spinal needle at a lumbar interspace.
Then 20ml of bupivacaine 0.125% + fentanyl 2ug/ml will be injected in the epidural space.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* singleton and vertex presentation
* 37-42 weeks of gestational age
* active labor with cervical dilation \< 5cm
* body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2
* desired labor epidural analgesia
Exclusion Criteria
* presence of any pregnancy-related disease (e.g., gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes)
* known fetal anomalies
* increased risk of cesarean delivery (e.g., previous uterine rupture, previous cesarean delivery)
* coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or partial prothrombin time ≥ 50)
* renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
* hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
* allergy to LA
* prior sacral or lumbar spine surgery
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Felipe Contreras Godoy
Clinical Instructor, Department of Anesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Hospital La Florida
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Suzuki N, Koganemaru M, Onizuka S, Takasaki M. Dural puncture with a 26-gauge spinal needle affects spread of epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996 May;82(5):1040-2. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199605000-00028.
Cappiello E, O'Rourke N, Segal S, Tsen LC. A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1646-51. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184ec14.
Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.
Tran DQ, Van Zundert TC, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Finlayson RJ. Primary Failure of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Training Centers: The Invisible Elephant? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):309-13. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000394.
Thomas JA, Pan PH, Harris LC, Owen MD, D'Angelo R. Dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique does not improve labor epidural catheter function. Anesthesiology. 2005 Nov;103(5):1046-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200511000-00019.
Landau R, Ciliberto CF, Goodman SR, Kim-Lo SH, Smiley RM. Complications with 25-gauge and 27-gauge Whitacre needles during combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001 Jul;10(3):168-71. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2000.0834.
Beilin Y, Zahn J, Bernstein HH, Zucker-Pinchoff B, Zenzen WJ, Andres LA. Treatment of incomplete analgesia after placement of an epidural catheter and administration of local anesthetic for women in labor. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jun;88(6):1502-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199806000-00013.
Contreras F, Morales J, Bravo D, Layera S, Jara A, Riano C, Pizarro R, De La Fuente N, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: a randomized comparison between 25-gauge and 27-gauge pencil point spinal needles. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May 22:rapm-2019-100608. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100608. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
922/17
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.