Does Ultrasound Help With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients?

NCT ID: NCT02207972

Last Updated: 2018-02-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators believe that ultrasound guided CSE technique will accurately place the epidural needle in the midline position compared to epidural needle placement via palpation of anatomical landmarks. This will result in positive CSF in the spinal needle, correct placement of the catheter, and adequate symmetrical labor analgesia/anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Epidurals provide superior labor analgesia and anesthesia. Unfortunately, failure of epidural anesthesia and analgesia is a frequent clinical problem. In a heterogeneous cohort of 2,140 surgical patients, a failure rate of 27% for lumbar epidural was described. However, the definition of a failed epidural is broad. Different definitions include insufficient analgesia to catheter dislodgement to conversion to general anesthesia. Epidural analgesia failures may result from technical difficulties, insufficiencies or overdosing of local anesthetics, epidural septum or midline adhesions, and placement of the epidural catheter through an intervertebral foramen or into the anterior epidural space. In an imaging study of failed epidurals, incorrect catheter placement accounted for half of the failures, while the remaining patients experienced suboptimal analgesia through a correctly positioned catheter.

The incidence of overall failure was lower in patients receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) catheters versus epidural analgesia. In one study, the CSE technique provided decreased failure rates for labor analgesia and comparable or decreased failure rates for surgical anesthesia, when compared with reported failure rates for epidural anesthesia. It is believed that positive CSF flow in the spinal needle confirms correct epidural needle placement in the epidural space and also confirms the epidural needle to be in the midline position. Placement of the epidural needle in the midline position will minimize the incorrect placement of the catheter to one side, providing a symmetrical analgesia versus unilateral analgesia.

However, the practice of CSE and epidural catheter placement relies on the palpation of anatomical landmarks that are not always easy to feel. Therefore, the epidural needle maybe placed "off midline" despite positive loss of resistance (LOR) that causes negative CSF flow in the spinal needle and an incorrectly placed catheter. As a result, the incorrect catheter placement will result in a "failed" or suboptimal epidural analgesia.

Ultrasound has recently been utilized to facilitate lumbar epidurals and spinals. The US imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Use of Ultrasound

Woman requests epidural for pain relief Ultrasound guided CSE placed Continuous epidural infusion started Infusion 12 ml/hr of 0.0625% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 2mcg/ml

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Use of Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

The ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.

No ultrasound used

Palpation of anatomical landmarks Woman requests epidural for pain relief CSE placed using palpation of anatomical landmarks Continuous epidural infusion started Infusion 12 ml/hr of 0.0625% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 2mcg/ml

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No ultrasound used

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Palpation of anatomical landmarks is used for placement of labor analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Use of Ultrasound

The ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.

Intervention Type DEVICE

No ultrasound used

Palpation of anatomical landmarks is used for placement of labor analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparious
* Term (\>37 weeks gestation)
* Vertex presentation
* Singleton gestation
* Ability to provide informed consent
* Request for analgesia for labor pain
* Maternal age 18 years or greater

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiparous
* Preterm (\< 37 weeks gestation)
* Presentation other than vertex (breech, transverse)
* Active drug/alcohol dependence
* Previous spinal surgeries
* Known spinal deformities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

48 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Migdalia Saloum, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mount Sinai Roosevelt Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount-Sinai Roosevelt hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB #12-172

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Obstetric Placement Study Using EST
NCT04109365 RECRUITING NA
Amniotic Fluid Analysis
NCT06131684 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1