Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT04234178
Last Updated: 2022-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-01
2021-02-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the first stage of labor, pain is caused by uterine contractions and pressure on the cervix. Pain is transmitted through the T10-L2 spinal nerves and is felt in the abdominal wall, waist, hips, or thighs. In the second stage, pain from the vagina and perineum is added to uterine pain. This pain is transmitted by the pudendal nerves through the S2-4 nerve roots.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of dural puncture epidural analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia with epidural volume extension on labor variables.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Epidural vs. Dural Puncture Epidural in Labor Analgesia
NCT06849726
Comparison of Epidural, Combined and Dural Puncture Labor Epidural on Pain, and Course of Vaginal Delivery
NCT04290702
Dural Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural Analgesia in Labor
NCT07278895
Impact of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Lumbar Epidural on Onset of Labor Analgesia
NCT02412969
Sacral Spread of Sensory Block After Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Compared With Epidural for Labour Analgesia
NCT05217134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dural puncture epidural
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Epidural
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Combined spinal-epidural with epidural volume extension
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Intrathecal+Epidural
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidural
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Intrathecal+Epidural
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pregnant patients in active labor
* active labor with cervical dilation \< 5cm
* 37-42 weeks of gestational age
* Pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women outside the age range of 18 - 45
* Pregnants other than Nullipar
* Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
* Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac)
* Gestational comorbidity (preeclampsia, eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
* Substance abuse history
* Chronic pain history
* Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
* BMI\> 35 kg / m2
* Failure in neuraxial interventions
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammed E Aydin
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammed En Aydin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ataturk University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Erzurum Regional Training Research Hospital
Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Contreras F, Morales J, Bravo D, Layera S, Jara A, Riano C, Pizarro R, De La Fuente N, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: a randomized comparison between 25-gauge and 27-gauge pencil point spinal needles. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May 22:rapm-2019-100608. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100608. Online ahead of print.
Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.
Doymus O, Aydin ME, Bedir Z, Tor IH, Ejder Tekgunduz S, Doymus G, Celik EC, Ahiskalioglu A. Epidural volume extension versus dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: A prospective randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 7;104(10):e41691. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041691.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ATATURKLABOR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.