Higher vs Lower Lumber Epidural Catheter Insertion During Labour: A Randomised Trial to Compare Efficacy.

NCT ID: NCT06850636

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-25

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will randomise pregnant women to labour epidural at a higher versus a lower lumbar level. Outcomes relating to success or failure of the epidural catheter at this level will be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Epidural analgesia is widely used in different types of surgeries and procedures. Pregnant women in labour compromise the single largest group benefiting from epidural analgesia. During first stage of labour (dilatation of the cervix), an epidural should cover the sensory dermatomes from T10 to L1 to achieve a good pain relief. In the second stage of labour (descent of the baby through the cervical canal), pain is mediated via S2-S4 nerve roots. Accordingly, labour epidurals are commonly placed at the lower lumbar (L3-L4) interspace.1 A study was conducted by Moore et al., comparing high vs low lumbar epidural, showed that lower epidurals provide superior perineal analgesia, when used with a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) infusion with continuous epidural infusion (CEI), but provided less pain relief early in labour. Another study, a metanalysis showed that another mode of delivery of the local anaesthetics is more effective; which is the Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) with PCEA. The incidence of breakthrough pain, the rates of local anaesthetic usage were significantly reduced, the labour duration was statistically shorter, and the maternal satisfaction score was significantly improved in the PIEB + PCEA group compared with that in the CEI + PCEA group.

This is a prospective randomised study where women will be randomised to a high or low epidural catheter to determine which is superior for maternal analgesia efficacy and satisfaction.

Randomised to intervention 'high epidural' or 'low epidural' groups. Within these groups there are two subgroups based on the specific lumbar vertebral level; high epidural (L 1,2 or L 2,3 levels) and low epidural (L 3,4 or L 4,5 levels).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labour Analgesia, Epidural Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective randomised study where women will be randomised to a high or low epidural catheter to determine which is superior for maternal analgesia efficacy and satisfaction.

Randomised to intervention 'high epidural' or 'low epidural' groups. Within these groups there are two subgroups based on the specific lumbar vertebral level; high epidural (L 1,2 or L 2,3 levels) and low epidural (L 3,4 or L 4,5 levels).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epidural analgesia performed at a higher lumbar epidural level

Epidural analgesia performed using Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses using an epidural catheter at a higher lumbar epidural level sited at L1,L2 or L2,L3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Labour epidural analgesia

Epidural analgesia performed at a lower lumbar epidural level

Epidural analgesia performed using Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses using an epidural catheter sited at lower epidural level (L3,L4 or L4,L5)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epidural Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Labour epidural analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epidural Analgesia

Labour epidural analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Women electing to have epidural analgesia in labour

Exclusion Criteria

Known contraindication to epidural analgesia. Neurological illness Multiple gestation Fetal abnormalities In distress or requiring immediate epidural catheter placement
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Rotunda Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tom Drew

Principal Investigator and Consultant Anaesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin

Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thomas Drew, FCAI

Role: CONTACT

018171753

Mohamed Mostafa

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Thomas Drew Consultant Anaesthetist, MbBChBAO

Role: primary

01 8171753

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC-2024-027

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.