Pain Relief Effects on Length of Labor

NCT ID: NCT01750099

Last Updated: 2014-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study divides patients into two groups when they ask for medicine to help relieve the pain of contractions. One group will be selected to receive an epidural and another group will be selected to receive both a spinal dose and an epidural. The investigators will then measure how long it takes to deliver the baby. The investigators think that the group that has the combination spinal and epidural will have a faster labor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators will evaluate conventional continuous lumbar epidural analgesia compared to the combined spinal-epidural analgesia. The primary outcome of interest will be duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor. Secondary outcomes include the cesarean delivery rate, operative vaginal delivery rate, analgesia requirements, maternal and neonatal safety profiles (incidence of maternal hypotension, post puncture dural headache, fetal acidemia and NICU admissions, respectively), Adequacy of maternal pain relief will also be measured using visual analog scores (VAS). The investigators hypothesize that the instantaneous pain relief that is achieved with combined spinal-epidural analgesia reduces catecholamines quickly and to a greater degree than the conventional epidural, leading to a more effective uterine contraction pattern thus decreasing the duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combined spinal-epidural

After verification of being in the intrathecal space with free-flow of cerebral spinal fluid, 1 mL of 0.25% bupivicaine along with 20 mcg of fentanyl will be injected into the intrathecal space. Subsequently, a B/Braun Perifix FX closed tip multiorifice flexible epidural catheter will be threaded 4 cm into the epidural space. After obtaining a T6 dermatomal level of sensory blockade, a standard solution consisting of 0.125% bupivicaine with 2 mcg of fentanyl/mL of solution will be started at 10 mL/hour with a patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) option of 8 mL every 45 minutes. If a patient requires redosing, 5-10 mL of 0.25% bupivicaine will be injected slowly through epidural catheter with a goal dermatome level of T6. No systemic opioids will be given.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Combined Spinal-epidural

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See arm description

Continuous lumbar epidural

After identifying the epidural space with the loss of resistance technique, a standard flexible epidural catheter will be threaded 4 cm into the epidural space. A standard test dose of 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 will be given through the catheter. If positive for vascular or intrathecal placement, procedure to be repeated at different interspace. If negative, catheter will be secured and slowly dosed with 5-10 mL of 0.25% bupivicaine through epidural catheter with a goal dermatome level of T6. After obtaining the dermatome level of sensory blockade, a standard solution consisting of 0.125% bupivicaine with 2 mcg of fentanyl/mL of solution will be started at 10 mL/hour with a PCEA option of 8 mL every 45 minutes. If a patient requires redosing, 5-10 mL of 0.25% bupivicaine will be injected slowly through epidural catheter with a goal dermatome level of T6. No systemic opioids will be given.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Continuous Lumbar epidural

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See arm description

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Combined Spinal-epidural

See arm description

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous Lumbar epidural

See arm description

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Spinal dose: 1 ml of 0.25 % bupivicaine 20 mcg of fentanyl Epidural dose: 0.25 % bupivicaine (various amounts according to protocol) fentanyl 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200000 0.25 % bupivicaine fentanyl

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparous women
* Term gestation, defined as equal to or greater than 37 weeks
* Ages 16-44 years
* Singleton gestation
* Cephalic presentation
* Induction of labor on Monday 0700 through Friday 0700 at Parkland Hospital
* Intact membranes on admission

Exclusion Criteria

* Chorioamnionitis at randomization
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Coagulopathy
* Allergies to amide local anesthetics
* Localized back infection
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

44 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erica Grant

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erica N Grant, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UTSW

Kenneth Leveno, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UTSW

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Parkland Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU 042012-035

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.