Contextual Coaching Versus Training Workshop for Assistants in Special Education.

NCT ID: NCT04747210

Last Updated: 2021-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Special Need Assistants/paraprofessionals serve an essential role in special education to support children with multiple disabilities, but they often lack adequate training and supervision. The study aims to examine the effects of the coaching program for assistants compared to a workshop outside working hours and evaluate the outcomes in students and assistants. The second aim is to measure fidelity implementation of coaching practices and if the intervention was participation-based.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study addresses the training needs of assistants to minimize participation barriers of the students. The schools will be assigned to one of two groups: both groups will receive a 10 hours training workshop; only the intervention group will receive coaching one-to-one. The duration and number of coaching sessions will depend on the caregivers' time available, daily routines, and goals. Coaching sessions will be recorded for the assessment of treatment fidelity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Disabled Persons Caregiver

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. Repeated measures on participants in both arms (as in an RCT) enable assessment of both within-person changes over time and between-arm differences.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Two external assessors will measure the fidelity of the implementation of the intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trainig workshop and Coaching one-on-one

Ten-hour training workshop that was divided into three sessions outside working hours. Coaching one-on-one in the daily routines and natural environment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

contextual one-on-one coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Training workshop and coaching one-on-one

Trainig workshop

Assistants receive ten-hour training workshop that was divided into three sessions outside working hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trainig workshop

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Ten-hour training workshop.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

contextual one-on-one coaching

Training workshop and coaching one-on-one

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Trainig workshop

Ten-hour training workshop.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Special Need Assistant of students between 4-21 years of age.
* Speak, read and comprehend Spanish.
* Be available for workshop and one-on-one coaching.
* Able to verbalize changes in their own performance or their students' participation.
* Written consent.


* Present difficulties in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).
* Have an assistant involved in the study.
* Informed consent signature (parents or legal tutors).

Exclusion Criteria

* Have no students involved in the program.


* Independence in activities of daily living.
* 70 or more points in the Care Dependency Scale for Pediatrics (CDS-P).
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de Zaragoza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maria Jose López-de-la-Fuente

Occupational Therapist. Departamento de Fisiatría y Enfermería

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maria J López-de-la-Fuente

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Departamento de Fisiatría y Enfermería. Universidad de Zaragoza

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lopez-de-la-Fuente MJ, Herrero P, Garcia-Foncillas R, Gomez-Trullen EM. Contextual, Client-Centred Coaching Following a Workshop: Assistants Capacity Building in Special Education. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;18(12):6332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126332.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34208053 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COACHvsW

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Problem-Solving Training
NCT05688319 COMPLETED NA