Embryos With Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) Inconclusive Result: Clinical Implications
NCT ID: NCT04734769
Last Updated: 2021-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-20
2022-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implantation Failure and PGD
NCT00547781
Study of Abnormally Fertilized Embryos
NCT06940973
Preimplantation Genetic Screening in IVF Treatment
NCT05009745
Pre-implantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disease: Single Center Experience
NCT05936749
Predictive Value of Embryonic Testing
NCT03604107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Certain advances in ART such as vitrification or improvement in culture media makes safer the PGT-A procedure. As a result of these improvements, embryo biopsy has been driven from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage for preimplantional genetic testing for aneuploidy analysis (PGT-A 2.0) and it is now the method of choice for PGT-A in many centers. Trophectoderm biopsy presents advantages over the use of blastomere biopsy: 1. It allows obtaining around 6-10 cells without reducing the potential for pre-embryo development or its ability to implant. 2. Greater strength in the results, since it reduces false diagnoses associated with factors such as mosaicism. 3. It allows a combined study for monogenic mutations, aneuploidy screening and / or structural alterations.
The frequency of inconclusive results in PGT-A varies depending on the embryonic stage used, with values of 9-10% of the total embryos analyzed for single blastomere biopsy and between 2-6% when trophectoderm cells are biopsied.
These inconclusive results, mainly in couples without euploid embryos available to transfer, cause them uncertainty and disappointment. In these situations, it is advisable to guide patients in making decisions about what to do with these pre-embryos through genetic counselling. Patients must decide if they wish to reject them, to transfer them without the certainty of a reliable diagnosis or to re-analyze them. Scientific literature reporting these types of inconclusive results and that give advice about its possible etiology are scarce. There is no clear evidence about the impact of double biopsy, double vitrification-warming or if transferring embryos with inconclusive results, is safe for achieving a healthy newborn. The objective of this review is to learn from the published studies about the safety of embryo re-analysis and its potential reproductive outcome when there are embryos with inconclusive results after PGT, in order to offer adequate counselling for patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cycles of embryo transfer from patients with at least one euploid embryo (no rebiopsy group)
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Rebiopsy group:
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women age 18-45 years.
* PGT-A Indication.
* All embryos with informative results.
* Women age 18-45 years.
* PGT-A Indication.
* At least one embryo result with lack of diagnosis.
* At least one rebiopsied embryo.
* At least one euploid result from rebiopsied embryo.
* Single embryo transfer.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA
OTHER
Juno Therapeutics, Inc., a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
INDUSTRY
IVI Vigo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elkin Muñoz
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IVI Vigo
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cobo A, Castello D, Vallejo B, Albert C, de los Santos JM, Remohi J. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates. Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.106. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Chen HH, Huang CC, Cheng EH, Lee TH, Chien LF, Lee MS. Optimal timing of blastocyst vitrification after trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185747. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-VGO-095-EM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.