Embryos With Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) Inconclusive Result: Clinical Implications

NCT ID: NCT04734769

Last Updated: 2021-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-20

Study Completion Date

2022-11-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One of the most remarkable improvements in trophoectoderm cells biopsy is the robustness of diagnosis as result of analyzing multiple cells. However, there is a proportion of embryos that lack of diagnosis due to amplification failure or inconclusive results ranging between 0,4% and 6%. Information about embryo repeated biopsy after an inconclusive result in a first biopsy is very scarce. No specific conclusions can be drawn, due to the limited information currently available concerning reproductive outcomes for patients who had embryo transfer after a second biopsy, due to a first one having an inconclusive result. Investigators purpose a multicenter retrospective observational study with the aim to evaluate the reproductive potential of re-biopsied blastocyst with inconclusive results on preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using the implantation rate (IR) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) as principal variables.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main objective of assisted reproduction technologies (ART) is to achieve a healthy live newborn. The selection of an euploid embryo using PGT-A, offers theoretical advantages including increased implantation rate, reduced abortion rate, and reduces the time to achieve an ongoing pregnancy.

Certain advances in ART such as vitrification or improvement in culture media makes safer the PGT-A procedure. As a result of these improvements, embryo biopsy has been driven from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage for preimplantional genetic testing for aneuploidy analysis (PGT-A 2.0) and it is now the method of choice for PGT-A in many centers. Trophectoderm biopsy presents advantages over the use of blastomere biopsy: 1. It allows obtaining around 6-10 cells without reducing the potential for pre-embryo development or its ability to implant. 2. Greater strength in the results, since it reduces false diagnoses associated with factors such as mosaicism. 3. It allows a combined study for monogenic mutations, aneuploidy screening and / or structural alterations.

The frequency of inconclusive results in PGT-A varies depending on the embryonic stage used, with values of 9-10% of the total embryos analyzed for single blastomere biopsy and between 2-6% when trophectoderm cells are biopsied.

These inconclusive results, mainly in couples without euploid embryos available to transfer, cause them uncertainty and disappointment. In these situations, it is advisable to guide patients in making decisions about what to do with these pre-embryos through genetic counselling. Patients must decide if they wish to reject them, to transfer them without the certainty of a reliable diagnosis or to re-analyze them. Scientific literature reporting these types of inconclusive results and that give advice about its possible etiology are scarce. There is no clear evidence about the impact of double biopsy, double vitrification-warming or if transferring embryos with inconclusive results, is safe for achieving a healthy newborn. The objective of this review is to learn from the published studies about the safety of embryo re-analysis and its potential reproductive outcome when there are embryos with inconclusive results after PGT, in order to offer adequate counselling for patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Embryo Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cycles of embryo transfer from patients with at least one euploid embryo (no rebiopsy group)

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Intervention Type OTHER

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Rebiopsy group:

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Intervention Type OTHER

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Collect retrospectively clinical data on reproductive outcomes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cycles of embryo transfer from patients with at least one euploid embryo (no rebiopsy group):
* Women age 18-45 years.
* PGT-A Indication.
* All embryos with informative results.
* Women age 18-45 years.
* PGT-A Indication.
* At least one embryo result with lack of diagnosis.
* At least one rebiopsied embryo.
* At least one euploid result from rebiopsied embryo.
* Single embryo transfer.

Exclusion Criteria

Double embryo transfer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Juno Therapeutics, Inc., a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

IVI Vigo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elkin Muñoz

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

IVI Vigo

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elkin Muñoz

Role: CONTACT

986021860

Agustina Ramos Gutierrez

Role: CONTACT

986021860

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cobo A, Castello D, Vallejo B, Albert C, de los Santos JM, Remohi J. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates. Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.106. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23415972 (View on PubMed)

Chen HH, Huang CC, Cheng EH, Lee TH, Chien LF, Lee MS. Optimal timing of blastocyst vitrification after trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185747. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28982142 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-VGO-095-EM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.