Single Embryo TrAnsfeR of Euploid Embryo

NCT ID: NCT02268786

Last Updated: 2020-05-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

661 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) by next generation sequencing (NGS) compared to standard morphological assessment of embryos on pregnancy rates through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). All embryos will be vitrified and a single embryo transfer (SET) will be performed with either screened or unscreened embryos depending on randomization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility Aneuploidy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Intent to transfer single euploid embryo based on NGS testing (VeriSeqâ„¢ PGS) of biopsied blastocysts

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preimplantation Genetic Screening by NGS

Intervention Type OTHER

The VeriSeq PGS takes advantage of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to provide comprehensive, accurate screening of all 24 chromosomes for selection of euploid embryos.

Group B

Intent to transfer single embryo based on morphological assessment according to the Gardner scoring system (no PGS)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preimplantation Genetic Screening by NGS

The VeriSeq PGS takes advantage of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to provide comprehensive, accurate screening of all 24 chromosomes for selection of euploid embryos.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Veriseq PGS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient undergoing IVF
* At least 2 blastocysts suitable for biopsy on day 5 or 6 of embryo development

Exclusion Criteria

* History of more than two prior implantation failure following IVF
* History of more than one miscarriage of viable pregnancy
* One or both partners known to be carrier(s) of a chromosomal abnormality
* Known genetic carrier couple and/or one or both partners carrier of a known autosomal dominant disorder
* Any other non-study related preimplantation genetic testing
* Use of donor oocytes
* Use of gestational carrier (surrogate or donor egg recipient).
* Severe oligospermia (\<1,000,000 sperm/ml); Surgical Sperm Retrieval for reasons other than post-vasectomy and CAVD
* Low ovarian reserve with (FSH) \>10 IU/L on day 2-4 of a prior menstrual cycle and/or (AMH) \<7 pmol/L (or \<1 ng/ml)
* Gender selection cycles
* Concurrent participation in another clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Reprogenetics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Genesis Genetics

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Illumina, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fertility Treatment Center

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

HRC Fertility

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Acacio Fertility Clinic

Laguna Niguel, California, United States

Site Status

HRC Fertility Pasadena

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Fertility Specialists Medical Group

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Science Center of San Francisco Bay Area

San Ramon, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (CCRM)

Lonetree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Associates of Delaware

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

CRM Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Georgia Reproductive Specialists

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Fertility Institute of Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Fertility Center of Illinois, Highland Park

Highland Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Advanced IVF Institute

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

IVF New England

Lexington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

IVF Michigan

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Genesis Genetics (USA) - Genetics Laboratory

Plymouth, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Science Center of New Jersey

Eatontown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Reprogenetics (USA) - Genetics Laboratory

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

IRMS at St. Barnabas

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Main Line Fertility

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Fertility Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas Fertility Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas IVF

Frisco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Fertility Institute

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

CORM Houston

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

Utah Fertility Center

Pleasant Grove, Utah, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Care Center

Sandy City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Seattle Reproductive Medicine

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Melbourne IVF

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Olive Fertility Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Reproductive Care Center

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

TRIO Fertility Treatment Practice

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Boston Place Clinic

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Care Fertility Group London

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Care Fertility Group Manchester

Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford Fertility Unit

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Genesis Genetics (UK) - Genetics Laboratory

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reprogenetics (UK) - Genetics Laboratory

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handyside AH. 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1965.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23993662 (View on PubMed)

Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):615-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1972.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23993664 (View on PubMed)

Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, Peck AC, Sills ES, Salem RD. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012 May 2;5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22551456 (View on PubMed)

Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, Kokocinski F, Michel CE. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24613537 (View on PubMed)

Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, Madankumar R, Saffer C, Das AF, Craig JA, Chudova DI, Devers PL, Jones KW, Oliver K, Rava RP, Sehnert AJ; CARE Study Group. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 27;370(9):799-808. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311037.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24571752 (View on PubMed)

Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S; STAR Study Group. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):1071-1079.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346. Epub 2019 Sep 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31551155 (View on PubMed)

Cornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32898291 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RGH-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cell Free Preimplantation Genetic Testing
NCT04628507 NOT_YET_RECRUITING