Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-24
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Embryo Selection by Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Test
NCT04339166
Effectiveness of PGT-A: IVF Versus ICSI
NCT03708991
Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
NCT04490889
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy of Polar Bodies
NCT04538560
Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies Using Cell-free DNA in Spent Culture Media
NCT04711239
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A. Another aim of this study is to check the concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A.
Methods The prospective cohort study will be performed at the reproductive medical center of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Participants who plan to receive an IVF cycle and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies will be enrolled in this study. The investigators will divide the participants into 3 groups: (1) combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A; (2) PGT-A; (3) non-invasive PGT-A. Basal characteristics, infertility history, ovarian reserve and embryo development of the three groups will be recorded. The samples will be detected ploidy by using next generation sequencing (NGS). Then, the investigators will choose embryo to transfer according to the embryo ploidy and follow the pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.
Outcome
1. Concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
2. The relationship between morphological grade and ploidy of non-invasive PGT-A
3. IVF outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
combined non-invasive PGT-A & PGT-A
Infertility women who underwent both non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
PGT-A
trophectoderm biopsy in blastocyst stage for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
non-invasive PGT-A
cell-free DNA collected from spent culture media for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
non-invasive PGT-A
Infertility women who underwent non-invasive PGT-A only
non-invasive PGT-A
cell-free DNA collected from spent culture media for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
PGT-A
Infertility women who underwent PGT-A only
PGT-A
trophectoderm biopsy in blastocyst stage for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PGT-A
trophectoderm biopsy in blastocyst stage for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
non-invasive PGT-A
cell-free DNA collected from spent culture media for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI:18\~30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Congenital uterine anomaly
* Severe male infertility (azoospermia)
* One of the couples with chromosome abnormality
* Malignancy
30 Years
44 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sofiva Genomics Co., Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Li-Te Lin
Attending doctor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Principal Investigator, Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kuan-Hao Tsui
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Hoseini SM. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction technology. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 May;49(5):101723. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101723. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
Sciorio R, Dattilo M. PGT-A preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and embryo selection in routine ART cycles: Time to step back? Clin Genet. 2020 Aug;98(2):107-115. doi: 10.1111/cge.13732. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Homer HA. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):317-324. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12960. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Fragouli E, Munne S, Wells D. The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies. Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):15-33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy036.
Sullivan-Pyke C, Dokras A. Preimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;45(1):113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.10.009.
Rubio C, Navarro-Sanchez L, Garcia-Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, Barroso G, Kopcow L, Bahceci M, Kulmann MIR, Lopez L, De la Fuente E, Navarro R, Valbuena D, Sakkas D, Rienzi L, Simon C. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):751.e1-751.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 May 26.
Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro-Sanchez L, Cimadomo D, Garcia-Pascual CM, Albricci L, Soscia D, Valbuena D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F, Simon C. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):510-519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
Leaver M, Wells D. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics? Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033.
Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Abramov R, Antes R, Ibarrientos Z, Motamedi G, Zaman A, Kuznyetsova I, Librach CL. Minimally Invasive Cell-Free Human Embryo Aneuploidy Testing (miPGT-A) Utilizing Combined Spent Embryo Culture Medium and Blastocoel Fluid -Towards Development of a Clinical Assay. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64335-3.
Liang B, Gao Y, Xu J, Song Y, Xuan L, Shi T, Wang N, Hou Z, Zhao YL, Huang WE, Chen ZJ. Raman profiling of embryo culture medium to identify aneuploid and euploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):753-762.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.036. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Jiao J, Shi B, Sagnelli M, Yang D, Yao Y, Li W, Shao L, Lu S, Li D, Wang X. Minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing using blastocyst culture medium. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1369-1379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez075.
Huang L, Bogale B, Tang Y, Lu S, Xie XS, Racowsky C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):14105-14112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Fang R, Yang W, Zhao X, Xiong F, Guo C, Xiao J, Chen L, Song X, Wang H, Chen J, Xiao X, Yao B, Cai LY. Chromosome screening using culture medium of embryos fertilised in vitro: a pilot clinical study. J Transl Med. 2019 Mar 8;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1827-1.
Vera-Rodriguez M, Diez-Juan A, Jimenez-Almazan J, Martinez S, Navarro R, Peinado V, Mercader A, Meseguer M, Blesa D, Moreno I, Valbuena D, Rubio C, Simon C. Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):745-756. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey028.
Belandres D, Shamonki M, Arrach N. Current status of spent embryo media research for preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 May;36(5):819-826. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01437-6. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Farra C, Choucair F, Awwad J. Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing of human embryos: an emerging concept. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2162-2167. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey314.
Xu J, Fang R, Chen L, Chen D, Xiao JP, Yang W, Wang H, Song X, Ma T, Bo S, Shi C, Ren J, Huang L, Cai LY, Yao B, Xie XS, Lu S. Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11907-11912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613294113. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
Shamonki MI, Jin H, Haimowitz Z, Liu L. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1312-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1112. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Youssef MM, Mantikou E, van Wely M, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Culture media for human pre-implantation embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 20;2015(11):CD007876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007876.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KSVGH20-CT12-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.