Study of the Efficacy of 24 Chromosome Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)

NCT ID: NCT01219283

Last Updated: 2015-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

334 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if 24 chromosome preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) increases implantation and delivery rates in couples attempting to conceive through in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

FISH based PGD techniques have provided little improvement in implantation and delivery rates. We believe that the use of 24 chromosome PGD, as compared to control (no PGD) will show a benefit to patients. This study is a randomized clinical trial that seeks to validate 24 chromosome PGD.

Patients that meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized prior to embryo transfer. In order to be randomized, the patient must have blastulated embryos suitable for biopsy on day 5. Half of the patients will received 24 chromosome PGD and will have 2 PGD normal embryos transferred. Half the the patients will receive no PGD and the 2 morphologically best embryos will be transferred. Follow up on pregnant patients will be a blood draw at approximately 9 weeks gestation and buccal swabs collected from the infant(s).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effect of PGD on Implantation Rates in IVF Cycles

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control (no PGD)

Receive their planned IVF treatment without PGD. 2 morphologically best embryos are transferred.

No interventions assigned to this group

Case (PGD)

Receive PGD in addition to their planned IVF Cycle. 2 morphologically best PGD normal embryos are transferred.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age of female partner of \< 43 years
2. Normal day-three FSH level (\< 15 mIU/mL)
3. Normal uterine cavity
4. Sufficient ejaculated spermatozoa in male partner for ART
5. Maximum of one prior failed IVF cycle

Exclusion Criteria

1. FSH level ≥ 15 mIU/mL
2. BMI greater than 32 kg/m2
3. Contraindication to gonadotropin stimulation
4. Unevaluated Ovarian mass
5. Need for surgical sperm removal
6. Any contraindication to undergoing in vitro fertilization
7. Age greater than 43 years
8. Presence of hydrosalpinges which communicate with the endometrial cavity
9. Clinical indication for PGD (undergoing IVF with PGD to rule out a known genetic defect)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

43 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard T Scott, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Medicine Associates

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Medicine Associates of PA at Lehigh Valley

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23731996 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RCT-2009-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Retrospective Database Studies
NCT01219296 COMPLETED