Does Tourniquet Use Have an Effect on Pain and Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT04733716
Last Updated: 2021-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-15
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Two Different Analgesic Methods on QoR-40 Score in Primary Unilateral Knee Arthroplasties
NCT07236073
Total Knee Arthroplasty and Clinical Findings
NCT04481711
Using Mobilization Exercises on Total Knee Arthroplasty Rehabilitation
NCT03215160
Effect of Preoperative Cold Therapy on Early Postoperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07134283
Comparison Between Kinesiotaping and Cold Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02747901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preoperative Procedure: All patients had anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of the bilateral knees, taken with a standard full-length weight-bearing the patients in bipedal stance, the knees in maximal extension for anterior-posterior and 30-degree flexion for lateral radiographs pre and postoperatively. In all patients, range of motion and contractures of both knee joints were recorded. All patient's educational level was also assessed. The pain threshold (PT) was evaluated using an analog algometer (Figure 1). The pain sensitivity was measured on the forearm using two mechanical pain stressors, which indicate which of an ascending sensory stimulus is first perceived as painful. This device is a force gauge that is used to apply an increasing amount of force to the skin through a 1 cm2 surface area until the pain threshold is achieved. This algometer stimulates pain, described as dull pressure at the pain threshold; the reliability and validity of this device have been reported. The pain sensitivity of all measurement patients was taken on the day before the surgery by the same author, and these values were blinded from another author who recorded the repetitive postoperative VAS and knee scores.
Operation Procedure: All patients were operated on in a single-center and experiences in arthroplasty practice. All the patients were operated on standard spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent cruciate-retaining Genesis II knee arthroplasty (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) with a midline incision and medial parapatellar approach with a fixed bearing design. Patella resurfacing was not performed, while patellar denervation was performed in all patients. Bone-cement (40 g) was used with a fourth-generation cementing device.
A pneumatic tourniquet was used before surgery at the proximal thigh and inflated before the skin incision until skin closure in group 1 and no used in group 2. The tourniquet was inflated to either 275 or 325 mmHg, depending on the patient's systolic blood pressure. Peri-operative tranexamic (TXA) acid was administrated intravenously with 20 mg/kg 30 min before surgery. Periarticular injection was not used for pain control in either group. An adductor canal block or epidural analgesia was not applied. Intra-articular drainage was used in every patient, which was removed after 24 h postoperatively.
Postoperative Management and Analgesic Procedure: On the day of surgery, intravenous paracetamol 1 g was given at 8-h intervals, and intramuscular diclofenac sodium 75 mg and intravenous tramadol 100 mg in 100 mL normal saline were given at 12-h intervals. This analgesic procedure was continued at the time of discharge, and all patients were discharged on the third day of surgery. Physical therapy was started on postoperative day 1 in all patients. The functional assessments and range-of-motion were measured during routine physical therapy sessions.
Postoperative Assessment of Pain and Function: VAS score assessment was done at 24 h (rest), 36 h (post-physical therapy), and 48 h (rest) postoperatively. The Knee Society Clinical Scoring System (KSS) was also used for evaluation of functional outcomes, which is a condition-specific validated questionnaire widely used to evaluate the functional capabilities of the knee joint before and after total knee arthroplasty. The KSS was done in the first year postoperatively. The KSS consists of two parts. One part is the knee score (KSS1), which includes pain (maximum 50 points), stability, total range of flexion, and other items (varus, valgus, extension delay, and flexion contracture). The other part (KSS2) is the function score, which has two components, walking capacity and stair-climbing ability and deductions done if the patient using any assistive devices.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Total Knee Arthroplasty with using Tourniquet
A pneumatic tourniquet was used before surgery at the proximal thigh and inflated before the skin incision until skin closure in this group. The tourniquet was inflated to either 275 or 325 mmHg, depending on the patient's systolic blood pressure.
Using Tourniquet
The purpose of this prospective randomized double blinded study was to compare the effect of using a tourniquet on early-stage pain and 1-year postoperative functional outcomes when patients were divided into two groups according to the pain threshold.
Total Knee Arthroplasty without using Tourniquet
A pneumatic tourniquet was not used in this group during the total knee arthroplasty.
Using Tourniquet
The purpose of this prospective randomized double blinded study was to compare the effect of using a tourniquet on early-stage pain and 1-year postoperative functional outcomes when patients were divided into two groups according to the pain threshold.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Using Tourniquet
The purpose of this prospective randomized double blinded study was to compare the effect of using a tourniquet on early-stage pain and 1-year postoperative functional outcomes when patients were divided into two groups according to the pain threshold.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* older than 18 years
* primary knee arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria
* diagnosed with fibromyalgia,
* history of knee operation,
* valgus knee,
* greater than 30° flexion contracture
* undergone bilateral knee arthroplasty or revision knee arthroplasty,
* chronic analgesic users, a
* patient with psychiatric disease
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Savaş Çamur
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Umraniye Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Umraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.