Real-time Diagnosis and Visualization of Tumor Margins in Excised Breast Specimens Using Zenith FLIM Diagnostics

NCT ID: NCT04683120

Last Updated: 2021-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-15

Study Completion Date

2022-11-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our investigational team has developed a technology to visualize the operative margins in 'real time,' in other words during the operation while the patient is still on the table. While different surgeons use different operative techniques, our technique involves removing the main lumpectomy specimen, marking two of its borders with suture to orient the specimen for correct pathologic evaluation.

The FLIM (Fluorescent Lifetime Imaging Microscopy) technique can differentiate between cancerous and noncancerous specimens using a complex algorithm that essentially utilizes a definitive delta between the metabolic activities of diseased and non-diseased tissue. The research coordinator along with the surgeon will be able to insert the lumpectomy specimen followed by the 6 shaved margins (one by one) in a matter of minutes once the specimens have been resected. To be clear, the FLIM analysis will be taking place in- vitro. The device is invitro test and would be tested against the gold standard the pathologist biopsy.

FLIM analysis by the surgeon will not take more than several minutes, therefore not adding any significant time for patient to be under anesthesia. All specimens will be removed from the patient's body prior to their evaluation by the FLIM technique. Our team will not be making decisions based on FLIM analysis during this early phase of study. In other words, even if FLIM suggests a positive margin still exists in the body, our team will not act on these results by resecting additional tissue at this stage. FLIM margin results will be compared directly with pathology results for accuracy of the findings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the investigational Zenith FLIM Diagnostics imaging device that's modality is a direct support during lumpectomy cancer surgery to achieve the common goal of improving patient quality of life by decreasing rates of re-operation. The team is fully dedicated to bringing the Gold Standard in the operating room, enabling margin assessment, in real time, at the histological detail.

Our operative technique involves removing the main lumpectomy specimen, marking two of its borders with suture to orient the specimen for correct pathologic evaluation. Next, we take 6 shave margins in all directions around the lumpectomy cavity (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, posterior, anterior) and anchor an orientation stitch at the far side of the margin, again, for pathologist to understand which side was farthest away from the lumpectomy specimen.

The research coordinator along with the surgeon will be able to insert the lumpectomy specimen into the Zenith FLIM device followed by the 6 shaved margins (one by one) in a matter of minutes once the specimens have been resected. To be clear, the Zenith FLIM analysis will be taking place in-vitro. The machine will be placed a good distance from the patient, in an ante-room, and does not require sterility. Of course, if the surgeon breaks sterility while handing off the specimens for FLIM analysis, he or she will have to re-sterilize as would be standard if sterile conditions are broken for any other reasons (having to re-scrub because sterility is broken is a common procedure). Once the specimens are placed in the Zenith FLIM, the specimens will no longer be sterile, but there is no need to maintain sterility of the specimens once they are in-vitro. In fact, even in the absence of Zenith FLIM analysis, once the specimens are placed in cups for pathologic evaluation, they are no longer sterile. In other words, loss of sterility of the specimen is a necessity of the operation regardless of Zenith FLIM analysis.

The device is an in-vitro test and would be tested against the gold standard: the pathologic evaluation of resected tissue. The test results would not be used for any diagnosis. Neither the test nor the unit comes in contact with patients under any circumstance. The Zenith FLIM margin results will be compared directly with pathology. The effectiveness of the Zenith FLIM Diagnostics margin results will be compared directly with pathology and evaluated in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oncology Breast Cancer Cancer Diagnosis Margins of Excision Margins, Tumor-Free

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Arm Study

This is a single arm study, which will involve all patients qualifying for Breast Conservation Therapy as a part of their breast cancer management excluding patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for inoperable disease.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Zenith FLIM Diagnostics

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In-vitro

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Zenith FLIM Diagnostics

In-vitro

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A) Age18 and over
* B) EnglishSpeaking
* C) Able to read and understand consent
* D) All patient's candidate for lumpectomy
* E) Recurrent cancer patients requiring lumpectomy
* F) All stages and grades of cancer as long as patient is lumpectomy candidate
* G) Margin1(S)
* H) Margin 2(I)
* I) Margin 3 (M)
* J) Margin 4 (L)
* K) Margin5(P)
* L) Margin 6 (A)

Exclusion Criteria

* A) Extensively damaged tissue
* B) Abnormal tissue(auto immune disease)
* C) Neoadjuvant treated breast
* D) Mastectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laser LabCorp

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brad Schoengood

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Laser LabCorp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laser LabCorp

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Laser LabCorp #001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Testing a New Imaging Agent to Identify Cancer
NCT04692831 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1