Shear Wave Elastography Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05068999
Last Updated: 2021-12-29
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Total Enrollment
35 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-12-31
Study Completion Date
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to investigate the role of shear wave elastography (SWE) for early assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive breast cancer.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is often used to treat patients with locally advanced breast cancer, large tumor but operable breast cancer, or proven lymph node metastasis. The advantage of NACT is that it can downstage tumor size and increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery as well as providing information on the drug response through assessment of the changes of tumor size . The pathological complete response has consistently been associated with good long-term outcomes, but is achieved in only 10%-20% of cases. Patients who achieve a pathological complete response have a better prognosis than those who do not . Higher rates of pathological complete response can be achieved when selecting for certain breast cancer subtypes and treatment regimens .
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that can be divided into different subtypes by immunohistochemical marker expression or gene expression array data. A new surrogate intrinsic subtype was proposed at the St Gallen meeting to separate luminal A, luminal B (HER2-/HER2+), HER2-enriched, and triple-negative disease . Similarly, tumors may have different prognosis based on their molecular subtypes. The luminal A subtype has a better prognosis than the other subtypes, and the triple-negative subgroup has the worst prognosis . On the other hand, the triple-negative subtype is more sensitive to chemotherapy than luminal A and B breast cancer .
Current techniques available for monitoring response to NACT are positron emission tomography (PET) , sonography, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) , and shear wave elastography (SWE) . Conventional sonography and mammography have poor reliability in evaluating the size of residual tumor after chemotherapy . SWE is a recently developed low-cost imaging technique for measuring tissue stiffness in a noninvasive and quantitative manner with high reproducibility . Tissue stiffness has been demonstrated to be significantly correlated with tumor growth as cancer development and progression require extensive reorganization of the extracellular matrix (ECM) . Increased deposition of collagen and other ECM molecules enhances the stiffness of tumoral stroma . Changes in tumor stiffness were significantly greater in patients who had a good response to NACT compared to those resistant to NACT. Breast cancer pre- and post-treatment stiffness obtained from SWE was significantly correlated with the presence of residual cancer . A study in showed that the SWE stiffness measured after 3 cycles of NACT and changes in stiffness from baseline were strongly associated with pCR after 6 cycles. The combination of the post-treatment SWE and grey scale ultrasound has also been shown to be promising for end-of-treatment identification of residual disease and thus response to NACT, with similar accuracies found in assessment by MRI .
Several histopathological classifications are available to categorize the tumor response to NACT. The Miller-Payne grading (MPG) and Residual Disease in Breast and Nodes (RDBN) are systems to assess the pathological response of NACT. MPG provides a five-step scale based on tumor cellularity in the excision/mastectomy specimen compared with the pretreatment core biopsy as follows: grade 1, no reduction in overall cellularity; grade 2, minor (\<30%) loss of cellularity; grade 3, estimated 30%-90% reduction in tumor cells; grade 4, \>90% loss of tumor cells; and grade 5, no invasive carcinoma (IC); ductal carcinoma in situ may be present.\[30\] RDBN uses the following formula: level 1, pathological complete response in breast and nodes, without or with carcinoma in situ, and levels 2-4, residual disease in three different amounts, calculated as 0.2 (residual breast tumor size in cm) + the index for the involved nodes (0 for no positive nodes, 1 for 1-4 nodes, 2 for 5-7 nodes, 3 for ≥8 nodes) + the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade (1, 2, or 3), which takes into account tumor size, lymph node stage, and histological grade to determine response.
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that can be divided into different subtypes by immunohistochemical marker expression or gene expression array data. A new surrogate intrinsic subtype was proposed at the St Gallen meeting to separate luminal A, luminal B (HER2-/HER2+), HER2-enriched, and triple-negative disease . Similarly, tumors may have different prognosis based on their molecular subtypes. The luminal A subtype has a better prognosis than the other subtypes, and the triple-negative subgroup has the worst prognosis . On the other hand, the triple-negative subtype is more sensitive to chemotherapy than luminal A and B breast cancer .
Current techniques available for monitoring response to NACT are positron emission tomography (PET) , sonography, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) , and shear wave elastography (SWE) . Conventional sonography and mammography have poor reliability in evaluating the size of residual tumor after chemotherapy . SWE is a recently developed low-cost imaging technique for measuring tissue stiffness in a noninvasive and quantitative manner with high reproducibility . Tissue stiffness has been demonstrated to be significantly correlated with tumor growth as cancer development and progression require extensive reorganization of the extracellular matrix (ECM) . Increased deposition of collagen and other ECM molecules enhances the stiffness of tumoral stroma . Changes in tumor stiffness were significantly greater in patients who had a good response to NACT compared to those resistant to NACT. Breast cancer pre- and post-treatment stiffness obtained from SWE was significantly correlated with the presence of residual cancer . A study in showed that the SWE stiffness measured after 3 cycles of NACT and changes in stiffness from baseline were strongly associated with pCR after 6 cycles. The combination of the post-treatment SWE and grey scale ultrasound has also been shown to be promising for end-of-treatment identification of residual disease and thus response to NACT, with similar accuracies found in assessment by MRI .
Several histopathological classifications are available to categorize the tumor response to NACT. The Miller-Payne grading (MPG) and Residual Disease in Breast and Nodes (RDBN) are systems to assess the pathological response of NACT. MPG provides a five-step scale based on tumor cellularity in the excision/mastectomy specimen compared with the pretreatment core biopsy as follows: grade 1, no reduction in overall cellularity; grade 2, minor (\<30%) loss of cellularity; grade 3, estimated 30%-90% reduction in tumor cells; grade 4, \>90% loss of tumor cells; and grade 5, no invasive carcinoma (IC); ductal carcinoma in situ may be present.\[30\] RDBN uses the following formula: level 1, pathological complete response in breast and nodes, without or with carcinoma in situ, and levels 2-4, residual disease in three different amounts, calculated as 0.2 (residual breast tumor size in cm) + the index for the involved nodes (0 for no positive nodes, 1 for 1-4 nodes, 2 for 5-7 nodes, 3 for ≥8 nodes) + the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade (1, 2, or 3), which takes into account tumor size, lymph node stage, and histological grade to determine response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Breast Neoplasms
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
shear wave elastography
Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an emerging technology that provides information about the inherent elasticity of tissues by producing an acoustic radiofrequency force impulse, sometimes called an "acoustic wind," which generates transversely-oriented shear waves that propagate through the surrounding tissue and provide biomechanical information about tissue quality. Although SWE has the potential to revolutionize bone and joint imaging, its clinical application has been hindered by technical and artifactual challenges. Many of the stumbling blocks encountered during musculoskeletal SWE imaging are readily recognizable and can be overcome, but progressive advances in technology and a better understanding of image acquisition are required before SWE can reliably be used in musculoskeletal imaging.
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* • Histologically confirmed infiltrating breast cancer
* Stage II or stage III disease. Nodal status must be examined by ultrasound, fine needle aspiration, sentinel node biopsy, or FDG-PET scan.
* Age ≥18
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1
* Adequate bone marrow function (ANC \>1.5 x 109/l, platelets \>100 x 109/l)
* Adequate hepatic function (ALAT, ASAT and bilirubin \<2.5 times upper limit of normal)
* Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance \>50 ml/min)
* LVEF ≥50% measured by echocardiography or MUGA
* Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Absence of any medical condition that would place the patient at unusual risk.
* Signed written informed consent
* Stage II or stage III disease. Nodal status must be examined by ultrasound, fine needle aspiration, sentinel node biopsy, or FDG-PET scan.
* Age ≥18
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1
* Adequate bone marrow function (ANC \>1.5 x 109/l, platelets \>100 x 109/l)
* Adequate hepatic function (ALAT, ASAT and bilirubin \<2.5 times upper limit of normal)
* Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance \>50 ml/min)
* LVEF ≥50% measured by echocardiography or MUGA
* Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Absence of any medical condition that would place the patient at unusual risk.
* Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* • previous radiation therapy or chemotherapy
* Other malignancy except carcinoma in situ, unless the other malignancy was treated ≥5 years ago with curative intent without the use of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
* Current pregnancy or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must use adequate contraceptive protection.
* Evidence of distant metastases. Evaluation of the presence of distant metastases may include chest X-ray, liver ultrasound, isotope bone-scan, CT-scan of chest and abdomen and/or FDG-PET scan, according to local procedures.
* Evidence of bilateral infiltrating breast cancer. Evaluation of the presence of bilateral infiltrating breast cancer may include mammography, breast ultrasound and/or MRI breast.
* Concurrent anti-cancer treatment or another investigational drug.
* Other malignancy except carcinoma in situ, unless the other malignancy was treated ≥5 years ago with curative intent without the use of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
* Current pregnancy or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential must use adequate contraceptive protection.
* Evidence of distant metastases. Evaluation of the presence of distant metastases may include chest X-ray, liver ultrasound, isotope bone-scan, CT-scan of chest and abdomen and/or FDG-PET scan, according to local procedures.
* Evidence of bilateral infiltrating breast cancer. Evaluation of the presence of bilateral infiltrating breast cancer may include mammography, breast ultrasound and/or MRI breast.
* Concurrent anti-cancer treatment or another investigational drug.
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rehab Awad Mohamed Ahmed
principle investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1189-200. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5894.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, Hoehn JL, Vogel VG, Dakhil SR, Tamkus D, King KM, Pajon ER, Wright MJ, Robert J, Paik S, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0235.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel members. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1736-47. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52. doi: 10.1038/35021093.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS, Marron JS, He X, Qaqish BF, Livasy C, Carey LA, Reynolds E, Dressler L, Nobel A, Parker J, Ewend MG, Sawyer LR, Wu J, Liu Y, Nanda R, Tretiakova M, Ruiz Orrico A, Dreher D, Palazzo JP, Perreard L, Nelson E, Mone M, Hansen H, Mullins M, Quackenbush JF, Ellis MJ, Olopade OI, Bernard PS, Perou CM. The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics. 2006 Apr 27;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-96.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, Ollila DW, Sartor CI, Graham ML, Perou CM. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2329-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1109.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Goldstein NS, Decker D, Severson D, Schell S, Vicini F, Margolis J, Dekhne NS. Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2007 Oct 15;110(8):1687-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22981.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Straver ME, Glas AM, Hannemann J, Wesseling J, van de Vijver MJ, Rutgers EJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ, van Tinteren H, Van't Veer LJ, Rodenhuis S. The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;119(3):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0333-1. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kim C, Han SA, Won KY, Hong IK, Kim DY. Early Prediction of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer Using a Novel FDG-PET Parameter for Cancer Stem Cell Metabolism. J Pers Med. 2020 Sep 17;10(3):132. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030132.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tudorica A, Oh KY, Chui SY, Roy N, Troxell ML, Naik A, Kemmer KA, Chen Y, Holtorf ML, Afzal A, Springer CS Jr, Li X, Huang W. Early Prediction and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative DCE-MRI. Transl Oncol. 2016 Feb;9(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cho N, Im SA, Park IA, Lee KH, Li M, Han W, Noh DY, Moon WK. Breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imaging. Radiology. 2014 Aug;272(2):385-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131332. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Li Q, Xiao Q, Li J, Wang Z, Wang H, Gu Y. Value of Machine Learning with Multiphases CE-MRI Radiomics for Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jun 28;13:5053-5062. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S304547. eCollection 2021.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evans A, Armstrong S, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Rauchhaus P, Purdie C, Jordan L, Jones L, Thompson A, Vinnicombe S. Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? Br J Cancer. 2013 Nov 26;109(11):2798-802. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.660. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lee SH, Chang JM, Han W, Moon HG, Koo HR, Gweon HM, Kim WH, Noh DY, Moon WK. Shear-Wave Elastography for the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S376-84. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4828-1. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chagpar AB, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Dempsey P, Buzdar AU, Mirza AN, Ames FC, Babiera GV, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, Singletary SE. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):257-64. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197714.14318.6f.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Yi A, Koo HR, Han W, Noh DY, Moon HG, Kim SJ. Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1627-7. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bai M, Du L, Gu J, Li F, Jia X. Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Feb;31(2):289-94. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.289.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Denis M, Bayat M, Mehrmohammadi M, Gregory A, Song P, Whaley DH, Pruthi S, Chen S, Fatemi M, Alizad A. Update on Breast Cancer Detection Using Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Sep;62(9):1644-50. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2015.007043.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, Jordan L, Baker L, Thompson A. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcos A, Schott S, Gomez C, Stieber A, Rauch G, Domschke C, Rom J, Schutz F, Sohn C, Heil J. Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:960262. doi: 10.1155/2014/960262. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zhu J, Xiong G, Trinkle C, Xu R. Integrated extracellular matrix signaling in mammary gland development and breast cancer progression. Histol Histopathol. 2014 Sep;29(9):1083-92. doi: 10.14670/HH-29.1083. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cox TR, Erler JT. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis Model Mech. 2011 Mar;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.1242/dmm.004077. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pickup MW, Mouw JK, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix modulates the hallmarks of cancer. EMBO Rep. 2014 Dec;15(12):1243-53. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439246. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gilkes DM, Bajpai S, Wong CC, Chaturvedi P, Hubbi ME, Wirtz D, Semenza GL. Procollagen lysyl hydroxylase 2 is essential for hypoxia-induced breast cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2013 May;11(5):456-66. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0629. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jing H, Cheng W, Li ZY, Ying L, Wang QC, Wu T, Tian JW. Early Evaluation of Relative Changes in Tumor Stiffness by Shear Wave Elastography Predicts the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Aug;35(8):1619-27. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.08052. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thompson A, Purdie C, Jordan L, Macaskill J, Waugh S, Fuller-Pace F, Brauer K, Vinnicombe S. Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer Comparing Interim Ultrasound, Shear Wave Elastography and MRI. Ultraschall Med. 2018 Aug;39(4):422-431. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111589. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thompson A, Purdie C, Jordan L, Macaskill J, Henderson S, Vinnicombe S. Identification of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: comparison of greyscale ultrasound, shear wave elastography, and MRI. Clin Radiol. 2018 Oct;73(10):910.e1-910.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, Hutcheon AW, Sarkar TK, Smith I, Schofield A, Heys SD. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003 Oct;12(5):320-7. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chollet P, Amat S, Belembaogo E, Cure H, de Latour M, Dauplat J, Le Bouedec G, Mouret-Reynier MA, Ferriere JP, Penault-Llorca F. Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer? Br J Cancer. 2003 Oct 6;89(7):1185-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601258.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chollet P, Abrial C, Durando X, Thivat E, Tacca O, Mouret-Reynier MA, Leheurteur M, Kwiatkowski F, Dauplat J, Penault-Llorca F. A new prognostic classification after primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: residual disease in breast and nodes (RDBN). Cancer J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-32. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31816bdea2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Abrial SC, Penault-Llorca F, Delva R, Bougnoux P, Leduc B, Mouret-Reynier MA, Mery-Mignard D, Bleuse JP, Dauplat J, Cure H, Chollet P. High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Dec;94(3):255-63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9008-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
elastography in breast cancer
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id