Mini-invasive Detection of Residual Disease in Breast Cancer Patients in Remission After Primary Chemotherapy
NCT ID: NCT05951699
Last Updated: 2023-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
105 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-28
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aims of this study are:
1. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in identifying residual breast in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease \<1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment.
2. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided needle biopsy in identifying residual axillary disease in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease \<1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment.
After neoadjuvant treatment, and evaluation with ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance, VAB will be performed on the breast, and needle biopsy will be performed on the axillary lymph node of pre-treatment cN1 cases, previously marked with a magnetic clip.
The biopsy findings will be compared with the surgical findings, consisting in quadrantectomy or mastectomy plus sentinel node biopsy (or separate removal of tagged lymph nodes if they do not coincide with the sentinel node(s)) to assess the ability of biopsy to identify residual disease.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis of Pathological Complete Response by Minimal Invasive Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
NCT02575612
Use of INnovative and Micro-INvasive TEchniques for the Early Identification of Breast Cancer Patients Benefitting From Neo-adjuvant Therapy
NCT05846997
Assessing the Accuracy of Tumor Biopsies After Chemotherapy to Determine if Patients Can Avoid Breast Surgery
NCT03188393
Screening for Breast Cancer With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
NCT02698202
Sentinel Node Biopsy Before and/or After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
NCT02031042
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Studies (3-6) demonstrated that pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast and/or axilla after neoadjuvant treatment predicted better overall survival (OS), better distant relapse-free survival (DRS), and lower mortality.
More recently, targeted neoadjuvant therapies achieve pCR in over 60% of patients (7,8) and in up to 70% of patients with HER2-positive or triple negative subtypes that are generally associated with poorer outcomes (9).
Ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging are still imprecise in identifying surgically confirmed residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (10,11) and the sensitivity and specificity of these imaging techniques vary markedly, (12) so surgery remains the most reliable method of detecting any residual disease.
The aims of this study are
1. to evaluate the ability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) to identify residual breast disease in breast cancer patients with either complete clinical/radiological complete response or with residual disease \<1 cm after systemic neoadjuvant treatment; and
2. to evaluate the ability of biopsy to identify residual axillary lymph node disease in patients who are cN1 pre-treatment and whose suspicious nodes are marked with a metal clip before treatment.
The VAB/needle biopsy results will be compared to pathological findings after quadrantectomy/mastectomy or surgical removal of the sentinel axillary lymph node(s) and tagged axillary lymph node(s) (if distinct from the sentinel node(s)).
This study is being conducted with a view to performing a future clinical trial on the omission of surgery in cases with clinical/radiological complete response and negative preoperative VAB.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy
cT1-cT2-cT3 cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with clinical/radiological complete response, or with \<1 cm residual breast disease after systemic primary treatment, undergo preoperative image-guided breast VAB with 9-gauge needle.
Patients who are cN1 before systemic primary treatment undergo removal of the tagged axillary nodes.
In both cases the aim is to identify any residual disease. Conservative breast surgery or mastectomy will be performed in all patients after multidisciplinary clinical evaluation.
Surgically confirmed residual tumor will be compared to VAB result.
minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy
minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast and needle biopsy of axillary lymph node
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy
minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast and needle biopsy of axillary lymph node
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed HER2-positive, triple negative or luminal B HER2-positive invasive breast cancer
* Clinical/radiological complete response or residual breast disease \<1 cm after primary chemotherapy
* Absence of locoregional relapse or distant metastasis
* Signed informed consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Multifocal disease or presence of microcalcifications at imaging.
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gabriele Martelli, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bonadonna G, Veronesi U, Brambilla C, Ferrari L, Luini A, Greco M, Bartoli C, Coopmans de Yoldi G, Zucali R, Rilke F, et al. Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of three centimeters or more. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1539-45. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.19.1539.
Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, Cruz AB Jr, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N, DeCillis A, Hoehn JL, Lees AW, Dimitrov NV. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2483-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2483.
Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Carey L, Davis SE, Buxton M, Hudis C, Gray JW, Perou C, Yau C, Livasy C, Krontiras H, Montgomery L, Tripathy D, Lehman C, Liu MC, Olopade OI, Rugo HS, Carpenter JT, Dressler L, Chhieng D, Singh B, Mies C, Rabban J, Chen YY, Giri D, van 't Veer L, Hylton N. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3242-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2779. Epub 2012 May 29.
Shin HC, Han W, Moon HG, Im SA, Moon WK, Park IA, Park SJ, Noh DY. Breast-conserving surgery after tumor downstaging by neoadjuvant chemotherapy is oncologically safe for stage III breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2582-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2909-6. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Martelli G, Miceli R, Folli S, Guzzetti E, Chifu C, Maugeri I, Ferranti C, Bianchi G, Capri G, Carcangiu ML, Paolini B, Agresti R, Ferraris C, Piromalli D, Greco M. Sentinel node biopsy after primary chemotherapy in cT2 N0/1 breast cancer patients: Long-term results of a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2012-2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, Suzanne Klimberg V, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4801-3. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
Goorts B, van Nijnatten TJ, de Munck L, Moossdorff M, Heuts EM, de Boer M, Lobbes MB, Smidt ML. Clinical tumor stage is the most important predictor of pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 May;163(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4155-2. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Santonja A, Sanchez-Munoz A, Lluch A, Chica-Parrado MR, Albanell J, Chacon JI, Antolin S, Jerez JM, de la Haba J, de Luque V, Fernandez-De Sousa CE, Vicioso L, Plata Y, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Alvarez M, Llacer C, Zarcos-Pedrinaci I, Carrasco E, Caballero R, Martin M, Alba E. Triple negative breast cancer subtypes and pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2018 May 29;9(41):26406-26416. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25413. eCollection 2018 May 29.
Chagpar AB, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Dempsey P, Buzdar AU, Mirza AN, Ames FC, Babiera GV, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, Singletary SE. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):257-64. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197714.14318.6f.
Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, Erb K, Julian T. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3160-3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1919-5. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
Fowler AM, Mankoff DA, Joe BN. Imaging Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Breast Cancer. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):358-375. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170180.
Heil J, Pfob A, Sinn HP, Rauch G, Bach P, Thomas B, Schaefgen B, Kuemmel S, Reimer T, Hahn M, Thill M, Blohmer JU, Hackmann J, Malter W, Bekes I, Friedrichs K, Wojcinski S, Joos S, Paepke S, Ditsch N, Rody A, Grosse R, van Mackelenbergh M, Reinisch M, Karsten M, Golatta M; RESPONDER Investigators. Diagnosing Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients by Minimal Invasive Biopsy: Oral Presentation at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium on Friday, December 13, 2019, Program Number GS5-03. Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):576-581. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004246.
Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(9):895-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03538.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INT 198/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.